On Tue, 2008-04-01 at 12:26 -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
On Tuesday 01 April 2008 10:09:17 am Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-03-31 at 09:52 +0200, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 2008-03-29 at 15:19 -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> >
> > > We recently tweaked the main kernel package's spec file such that we
now
> > > include arch in uname -r output, and have standardized a bunch of path
names
> > > to match. Completely forgot about kernel-xen in the process, until
yesterday,
> > > when I started porting everything over the the kernel-xen-2.6/devel spec.
> > >
> > > The attached spec patch has been build-tested, with some manual inspection
of
> > > the resulting packages, but hasn't yet been run-time tested for
possible
> > > issues (none expected, but you never know...). I'll happily help out
with any
> > > possible issues if you guys could give this a spin.
> > >
> > > Definitely want this in ASAP so the kernel and kernel-xen bits stay mostly
in
> > > sync (speaking of which, there's also some rpmposttrans stuff -- dkms
> > > hooks -- which went into the main kernel spec a bit ago that I don't
see in
> > > the kernel-xen-2.6 spec
> >
> > Thanks for the heads-up and the patch. I'm planning on rebasing
> > kernel-xen-2.6/devel to the latest kernel/devel sometime this week, so
> > we'll pick up all this stuff.
>
> Okay, kernel-xen in rawhide is rebased to 2.6.25-0.182.rc7.git6 if you
> want to take a look.
Apologies if this is a dupe, X is being a tad crashy on me today...
Looks much better, but a few places where %{KVERREL}xen should be
changed to %{KVERREL}.xen to be consistent with the other flavoured
kernels.
Thanks, applied.
Cheers,
Mark.