Chuck Ebbert schrieb:
Dave Jones wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 06:36:32PM +0200, dragoran wrote:
> > 126.96.36.199 is out ... so whats the plan now? Relase a FC6
> > update(updates-testing) or stick with 2.6.20.x until 2.6.22 is
> > out/2.6.21 get some more testing?
> We could do a rebase to .21 this week, and push that out to testing,
> and if anything critical turns up before that becomes deemed stable,
> we could push a branched build off of .20 directly to updates.
This doesn't make me very confident:
Well, didn't we have such bugs in the past, too? We just had no compiled
list of them afaik...
I'd like to see some kind of stability in FC6 while FC7
shaking out 2.6.21 bugs.
Well, getting a quite stable and working-on-lots-of-machines kernel on
the install media of F7 is also quite important imho.
/me votes for what davej suggested: "do a rebase to .21 this week, and
push that out to testing, and if anything critical turns up before that
becomes deemed stable, we could push a branched build off of .20
directly to updates."
Add a "send a announcement 'want do help getting the kernel of F7
tested? Then use "yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update kernel*" and
report any bugs'" to it. Well, something like that, I don't know if
kernel* really works...