http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/epel/2015-01-09/epel.2015-01-09-17.00.log.…
17:00:44 <smooge> #startmeeting epel17:00:44 <zodbot> Meeting started
Fri Jan 9 17:00:44 2015 UTC. The chair is smooge. Information about
MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.17:00:44 <zodbot> Useful
Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic.17:00:52
<smooge> #meetingname epel17:00:52 <zodbot> The meeting name has been
set to 'epel'17:01:13 <smooge> #chairs smooge nirik dgilmore
bstinson17:01:28 <smooge> Nirik I believe is going to be
absent17:01:32 <smooge> Evolution is absent17:01:51 <smooge> and
dgilmore might be on snowed in absense17:01:59 * nirik is actually
here right now...17:02:04 <nirik> but I might have to leave
early17:02:05 <smooge> #topic Roll Call17:02:12 <smooge> nirik, I
expect this will be a short meeting17:02:17 <nirik> cool.17:02:32
<bstinson> hi all17:02:39 <smooge> hi bstinson17:03:04 <smooge> #topic
Old Business17:03:30 <smooge> OK we don't have much old business from
the last meeting because it was a couple of weeks ago17:03:45 <smooge>
We had the orphaning and tyll found some bugs in his script that
didn't show all the orphans17:03:52 <smooge> so we have another
batch.17:04:23 * bstinson hasn't had a chance to look through the
email yet, how bad is it looking?17:04:36 <smooge> nirik, bstinson do
we want to have another orphan day or just have tyll do them when he
has a chance?17:04:48 <smooge> bstinson, it isn't any better than it
was before the last one :)17:04:54 * Jeff_S here a bit late17:05:16
<nirik> did we say 6 weeks or something? or has the timeout already
expired.17:05:33 <smooge> nirik, most of these packages are over 6
weeks (some are 22)17:05:48 <nirik> perhaps one last warn email and do
them next week?17:05:57 <bstinson> +117:06:06 <smooge> ok will send
out an email and ask tyll to do them next week around
Thursday?17:06:35 <smooge> alright anyone else have any other old
business?17:07:06 <bstinson> none here17:07:17 <nirik> nada17:07:30
<smooge> ok next up17:07:35 <smooge> #topic New Business17:07:55
<smooge> we have a non-responsive maintainer issue with
kanarip17:08:21 <Evolution> ack. sorry I'm late17:09:02 <nirik> well,
last time I talked to him he was busy, but wanted to keep being
co-maintainer.17:09:05 <smooge> ಠ_ಠ17:10:40 <smooge> nirik, did
someone make Marriane the maintainer of the package?17:11:06 <nirik>
hum? I'm not sure even what package we are talking about...17:11:09
<smooge> .whoowns perl-XML-TreePP17:11:10 <zodbot> smooge:
kanarip17:11:39 * nirik looks17:11:46 <nirik> .branches
perl-XML-TreePP17:11:48 <zodbot> nirik: el5 el6 epel7 f20 f21
master17:12:02 <smooge> the email was about the above which he is sole
maintainer of. I don't mind keeping him but since he is busy making
someone a comaintainer makes sense17:12:23 <nirik> they seem to own
the epel7 branch17:12:32 <nirik> so, I think they went ahead as they
should have.17:12:51 <nirik> You are supposed to ask the fedora
maintainer, wait a week, if no answer:: drive on17:13:09 <smooge>
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2014-December/205902.html17…
<nirik> so, I think it all got sorted17:13:50 <smooge> nirik, ah ok..
I did a whoowns which used to say something like epel7 (mmm)17:14:03
<smooge> and it just said kanarip so I thought it was still
waiting17:14:05 <nirik> that might be cached.17:14:06 <smooge> my
apologies17:14:13 <Jeff_S> So what was the problem? Did the bug just
not have the right flag set to get attention?17:15:00 <nirik> I think
they just were waiting forever, when the policy says wait a week and
then just request it.17:15:10 <Jeff_S> ok17:15:21 <nirik> not sure how
to make that any better. ;(17:15:31 <smooge> will put that in a blog
list of how to do things in EPEL17:16:00 <smooge> ok any other new
business?17:16:09 <Jeff_S> Yeah, I don't think that's a big deal
unless it's happening to a lot of requests17:16:59 <nirik> more
docs/blog posts on it should possibly help17:18:48 <smooge> I am
working on a couple.. I hope to get some time this weekend to get them
out17:19:05 <smooge> ok any other business we need to deal
with?17:19:19 <smooge> #topic Next Meeting Agenda Items17:19:46
<smooge> Ok please put in anything we want to have in the next meeting
or thought about in coming meetings17:19:47 <nirik> there was another
person asking about the epel-release permlink again17:19:58 <smooge>
yeah.. another roundtuit I need to get on17:20:13 <Jeff_S> ++
:)17:20:34 <smooge> I hope to look at it next week17:20:47 <Jeff_S>
Thanks17:21:05 <bstinson> should we brainstorm some topic ideas for
the CentOS-EPEL meetup at fosdem?17:21:15 <Jeff_S> bstinson: sure, rub
it in...17:22:31 * nirik notes he will not be there, but will be
around on irc if needed.17:22:38 <Jeff_S> I've gotta run, thanks
all17:22:47 <bstinson> was hoping we could live stream it :) but i'm
not sure if that's possible17:23:23 <Evolution> yeah, sadly some of
the key players won't be there17:23:28 <Evolution> nirik, smooge,
etc.17:24:25 <smooge> yeah.. I think we are going to do better just
having a public google hangout or something than try to do something
at an event most can't get to17:24:51 <smooge> not that I have been
any better with some of the EPEL meetings at Flock/FUDcon when CentOS
people couldn't attend17:26:14 <smooge> so lets just say we need to
come up with things for those who can make it to talk about and move
on17:27:22 <smooge> bstinson, most of the topics I would want to talk
about sort of need the rest of EPEL do'ers on to better converse.
Otherwise it could end up like my EPIC proposal.. lots of good ideas
but no buy-in17:29:08 <bstinson> that makes sense, it would be nice to
do a hangout sometime17:29:35 <smooge> ok lets see if we can get that
arranged.17:29:57 <smooge> anything else? I think we will lose nirik
soon17:31:26 <smooge> #topic Open Flood17:31:36 <smooge> Ok last call
on topics and things to talk about.17:31:38 <smooge> Last call17:31:51
<bstinson> nothing here17:31:57 * smooge wonders if Evolution will
wake up to those words17:32:09 <Evolution> I'm here17:32:15
<Evolution> I have nothing to contribute, but I'm here.17:32:19
<dgilmore> sorry guys I slept in17:32:46 <smooge> oh man.. I had a
whole bar closing thing typed in too17:32:51 <dgilmore> I should be at
fosdem17:33:14 <smooge> dgilmore, can you make the EPEL-CentOS
meetup?17:33:23 <dgilmore> smooge: should be able to yes17:34:38
<smooge> cool. that should help answer some of the questions about
build systems that will come up17:34:59 <smooge> Evolution, do you
know whats on kbsingh's mind for the meeting?17:35:17 <Evolution> I
believe interoperability.17:35:47 <Evolution> packages that should be
in epel coming from sigs, etc.17:36:09 <dgilmore> for me its
interoperability and working on finding ways to enable people to
contribute to epel via either CentOS or Fedora17:37:10 <smooge> ok I
think then that if everything gets recorded we can get some stuff done
then17:38:32 <smooge> dgilmore, anything you want in the next
meeting?17:39:56 <dgilmore> smooge: we should look at the policy for
branching packages from Fedora17:40:37 <smooge> dgilmore, yes I agree.
It comes up a lot17:40:49 <dgilmore> It seems many people are not
aware of it and quite a lot of people just go and request branches for
packages. I had it happen to one of mine recently17:41:32 * nirik
wonders if we can somehow automate it.17:41:56 <dgilmore> when
emailing the person that branched my package they thought anyone was
free to branch any package17:42:12 <dgilmore> nirik: we should find a
way to do it17:42:40 <dgilmore> nirik: moving branching into pkgdb
should give us a way to do so17:42:43 <nirik> yeah...17:44:02 <smooge>
ok so something for me to put on next weeks agenda? Can pkdb fix all
our problems?17:44:22 <dgilmore> smooge: its work that is
underway17:45:08 <dgilmore> we probably should make sure we get all
the policy right then palk to pingu and make sure we automate the
checks17:45:33 <smooge> ok so I am not clear on how policy should be
worded.. any examples and I can make a pass at something for
EPEL?17:46:01 <dgilmore> i think the existing polic is fine17:46:26
<dgilmore> we need to reaffirm it and make sure its visable and people
are aware of it17:47:04 <dgilmore> automated enforcement would help
with making people aware17:47:31 <smooge> And the exisitng policy is
the one you listed in the email yesterday?17:47:51 <dgilmore>
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Getting_a_Fedora_package_in_EPEL17:47:53
<dgilmore> correct17:48:13 <dgilmore> packagers can opt out of
epel17:48:37 <dgilmore> in which case people can freely request a
branch17:49:18 <smooge> and from what nirik said earlier.. if the
packager doesn't respond in a week they can branch anyway?17:49:49
<dgilmore> yep17:50:25 <dgilmore> the one thing i think we could add
is that sometimes a package really doesnt make sense in epel17:50:35
<dgilmore> and there should be a way to say so17:50:48 <smooge>
yeah17:51:20 <smooge> ok I will ponder how to do that and come back
next meeting on it17:51:29 <dgilmore> cool17:51:34 <dgilmore> i have
nothing else17:51:41 <smooge> ok me either..17:51:47 <smooge> my dog
says I need to walk her17:51:51 <smooge> so ..17:51:54 <smooge>
#endmeeting
--
Stephen J Smoogen.
Hi all,
The IRC meeting minutes today are available at the links below.
Thanks everyone for attending the meeting. In the meeting we mainly
talked about Offline Activities, FZUG local repo and
so on. Please review the proposed ideas and actions.
The next IRC meeting will be held on next Friday (2015-01-16).
Please come and join the discussion if you can!
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-zh/2015-01-09/fedora-zh.2015-01-09-…
Minutes (text):
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-zh/2015-01-09/fedora-zh.2015-01-09-…
Log:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-zh/2015-01-09/fedora-zh.2015-01-09-…
==================
#fedora-zh Meeting
==================
Meeting started by zsun at 13:18:15 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-zh/2015-01-09/fedora-zh.2015-01-09-…
.
Meeting summary
---------------
* roll call (zsun, 13:19:33)
* topic: Offline events (zsun, 13:21:26)
* topic: FZUG Websites and fedora-cn package repo (zsun, 13:21:41)
* topic FZUG wiki page (zsun, 13:22:14)
* Offline events (zsun, 13:22:49)
* IDEA: Hold HFD with Release Party (zsun, 13:23:30)
* Fedora 21 Release party Beijing will be on Jan 24th (zsun,
13:24:29)
* LINK: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-apac/ticket/176 (zsun,
13:26:37)
* ACTION: alick distribute polo shirts to registered ambassadors
(zsun, 13:28:31)
* Fedora 21 DVD already arrived at Red Hat Beijing Office (zsun,
13:29:48)
* ACTION: alick zsun tonghui discuess holding HFD together with
Release Party (zsun, 13:32:09)
* FZUG Websites and fedora-cn package repo (zsun, 13:34:04)
* 两台主机都开好,就等Robin的搭建成功了。另外还请大家讨论下打什么包/
定位的问题。(by tvvocold) (zsun,
13:34:49)
* all discuess wha package can be package in fedora-cn repo (zsun,
13:38:28)
* FZUG wiki page (zsun, 13:41:56)
* LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Zh/Menu/zh-cn (story,
13:43:02)
Meeting ended at 13:59:03 UTC.
Action Items
------------
* alick distribute polo shirts to registered ambassadors
* alick zsun tonghui discuess holding HFD together with Release Party
Action Items, by person
-----------------------
* alick
* alick distribute polo shirts to registered ambassadors
* alick zsun tonghui discuess holding HFD together with Release Party
* zsun
* alick zsun tonghui discuess holding HFD together with Release Party
* **UNASSIGNED**
* (none)
People Present (lines said)
---------------------------
* zsun (54)
* story (7)
* zodbot (5)
* endle (3)
* BadGirl (2)
* isyangxin (1)
* alick (0)
* tonghuix (0)
Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4
.. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot
======================
#fedora-meeting-1: fpc
======================
Meeting started by geppetto at 17:01:24 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2015-01-08/fpc.2015-01-08…
.
Meeting summary
---------------
* Roll Call (geppetto, 17:01:25)
* #484 Minor PHP Guidelines update (for PSR-4) (geppetto, 17:05:52)
* LINK: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/484 (geppetto, 17:05:52)
* ACTION: Minor PHP Guidelines update, for PSR-4 (+1:6, 0:1, -1:0)
(geppetto, 17:12:35)
* #486 help2man (geppetto, 17:13:08)
* LINK: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/486 (geppetto, 17:13:08)
* LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Manpages
(tibbs|w, 17:25:55)
* ACTION: Including help2man reference (+1:6, 0:1, -1:1) (geppetto,
17:30:14)
* #488 [RFC] Please update Python_Eggs packaging guidelines (geppetto,
17:30:28)
* LINK: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/488 (geppetto, 17:30:29)
* ACTION: Please update Python_Eggs packaging guidelines (+1:8, 0:0,
-1:0) (geppetto, 17:34:36)
* #489 Ruby guidelines: Updates for Minitest 5 (geppetto, 17:34:46)
* LINK: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/489 (geppetto, 17:34:46)
* ACTION: Would be nice if one of the main ruby packagers for Fedora
could make a macro for this. (geppetto, 17:40:48)
* ACTION: Ruby guidelines: Update guidelines due to lack of testrb
(+1:7, 0:0, -1:1) (geppetto, 17:45:30)
* #443 Requesting Bundling exception for Love (liblove sub package)
(geppetto, 17:45:54)
* LINK: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/443 (geppetto, 17:45:55)
* ACTION: Need more information on all 3 bundle requests, how much
custom code is there, how much work would it take to unbundle etc.
(geppetto, 17:59:57)
* #209 Please define policy regarding instantiated application
(geppetto, 18:00:10)
* LINK: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/209 (geppetto, 18:00:10)
* #208 Please add policy regarding socket activated services
(geppetto, 18:02:10)
* LINK: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/208 (geppetto, 18:02:10)
* ACTION: Someone needs to write the policy, feel free to try to work
with someone experienced with writing policy to help you (geppetto,
18:03:23)
* #478 Proposal: Package Guidelines: DevAssistant Assistant packages
(DAP) (geppetto, 18:04:03)
* LINK: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/478 (geppetto, 18:04:03)
* #481 static uids systemd-network, systemd-timesync, systemd-resolve
(geppetto, 18:06:43)
* LINK: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/481 (geppetto, 18:06:43)
* ACTION: zbyszek Can you answer: Why can't you chown in the
initramfs? What kind of state/data is in the initramsfs, or is it
just the uid security? Why do they need to be started before the
system has booted? (geppetto, 18:16:33)
* #412 Please change the packaging guidelines to include packaging
(geppetto, 18:19:10)
* LINK: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/412 (geppetto, 18:19:10)
* ACTION: follow vote from 9 months ago, writeup policy in description
(geppetto, 18:26:35)
* Open Floor (geppetto, 18:27:05)
* LINK: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/490 (tibbs|w, 18:29:04)
* LINK:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#BuildRequires_2
(tibbs|w, 18:36:49)
Meeting ended at 18:59:46 UTC.
Action Items
------------
* Minor PHP Guidelines update, for PSR-4 (+1:6, 0:1, -1:0)
* Including help2man reference (+1:6, 0:1, -1:1)
* Please update Python_Eggs packaging guidelines (+1:8, 0:0, -1:0)
* Would be nice if one of the main ruby packagers for Fedora could make
a macro for this.
* Ruby guidelines: Update guidelines due to lack of testrb (+1:7, 0:0,
-1:1)
* Need more information on all 3 bundle requests, how much custom code
is there, how much work would it take to unbundle etc.
* Someone needs to write the policy, feel free to try to work with
someone experienced with writing policy to help you
* zbyszek Can you answer: Why can't you chown in the initramfs? What
kind of state/data is in the initramsfs, or is it just the uid
security? Why do they need to be started before the system has booted?
* follow vote from 9 months ago, writeup policy in description
Action Items, by person
-----------------------
* **UNASSIGNED**
* Minor PHP Guidelines update, for PSR-4 (+1:6, 0:1, -1:0)
* Including help2man reference (+1:6, 0:1, -1:1)
* Please update Python_Eggs packaging guidelines (+1:8, 0:0, -1:0)
* Would be nice if one of the main ruby packagers for Fedora could
make a macro for this.
* Ruby guidelines: Update guidelines due to lack of testrb (+1:7, 0:0,
-1:1)
* Need more information on all 3 bundle requests, how much custom code
is there, how much work would it take to unbundle etc.
* Someone needs to write the policy, feel free to try to work with
someone experienced with writing policy to help you
* zbyszek Can you answer: Why can't you chown in the initramfs? What
kind of state/data is in the initramsfs, or is it just the uid
security? Why do they need to be started before the system has
booted?
* follow vote from 9 months ago, writeup policy in description
People Present (lines said)
---------------------------
* geppetto (182)
* tibbs|w (122)
* limburgher (34)
* tomspur (17)
* racor (16)
* Rathann (13)
* SmootherFrOgZ (11)
* orionp (11)
* zodbot (10)
* RemiFedora (7)
Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4
.. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot
============================================
#fedora-meeting: Infrastructure (2015-01-08)
============================================
Meeting started by nirik at 18:00:33 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2015-01-08/infrastructure.2…
.
Meeting summary
---------------
* aloha (nirik, 18:00:33)
* New folks introductions and Apprentice tasks (nirik, 18:03:18)
* Applications status / discussion (nirik, 18:09:55)
* lots of work on mirrormanager 2 unit tests. (nirik, 18:12:19)
* bodhi1 update out in production to fix db issue with newlines
(nirik, 18:12:31)
* work on FMN to get it ready for prod (nirik, 18:12:44)
* LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/22/Schedule
(threebean, 18:16:41)
* Sysadmin status / discussion (nirik, 18:18:40)
* LINK: https://admin.stg.fedoraproject.org/haproxy/proxy01 (nirik,
18:22:00)
* proxy01.stg needs a bit more work, but overall is looking great in
ansible (nirik, 18:22:31)
* LINK: https://github.com/fedora-infra/rube (threebean, 18:22:49)
* LINK:
https://github.com/fedora-infra/rube/tree/develop/rube.fedora#running
(threebean, 18:24:11)
* storage moves likely later this month. (nirik, 18:26:43)
* smooge and nirik will be in phx2 datacenter in feb (nirik,
18:26:54)
* LINK: http://nine.buildbot.net/ (tflink, 18:30:01)
* nagios/alerts recap (nirik, 18:32:24)
* Upcoming Tasks/Items (nirik, 18:33:20)
* LINK: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/list/infrastructure/
(nirik, 18:33:20)
* Open Floor (nirik, 18:36:04)
Meeting ended at 18:40:22 UTC.
Action Items
------------
Action Items, by person
-----------------------
* **UNASSIGNED**
* (none)
People Present (lines said)
---------------------------
* nirik (73)
* threebean (26)
* pingou (22)
* lmacken (16)
* smooge (7)
* tflink (6)
* sborza (5)
* zodbot (4)
* webpigeon (4)
* kushalk124 (4)
* fale (4)
* mhurron (3)
* kushal (1)
* puiterwijk (1)
* mpduty (1)
* danielbruno (1)
* abadger1999 (0)
* mdomsch (0)
* relrod (0)
* dgilmore (0)
--
18:00:33 <nirik> #startmeeting Infrastructure (2015-01-08)
18:00:33 <zodbot> Meeting started Thu Jan 8 18:00:33 2015 UTC. The chair is nirik. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
18:00:33 <zodbot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic.
18:00:33 <nirik> #meetingname infrastructure
18:00:33 <nirik> #topic aloha
18:00:34 <nirik> #chair smooge relrod nirik abadger1999 lmacken dgilmore mdomsch threebean pingou puiterwijk
18:00:34 <zodbot> The meeting name has been set to 'infrastructure'
18:00:34 <zodbot> Current chairs: abadger1999 dgilmore lmacken mdomsch nirik pingou puiterwijk relrod smooge threebean
18:00:38 * pingou
18:00:42 * webpigeon waves
18:00:46 * danielbruno here
18:01:04 * puiterwijk is here
18:01:07 <smooge> here
18:01:13 * lmacken
18:01:16 <nirik> morning everyone.
18:01:22 * nirik will wait a few min for folks to wander in
18:01:30 <kushalk124> hello :)
18:01:32 * sborza is here
18:02:00 <webpigeon> it's morning o.O
18:02:01 * threebean threebean
18:02:14 <webpigeon> threebean: that makes sixbean
18:02:23 <mpduty> hi
18:02:38 <threebean> webpigeon: or worse, nine! :|
18:03:14 <nirik> heh.
18:03:18 <nirik> #topic New folks introductions and Apprentice tasks
18:03:25 <nirik> any new folks like to introduce themselves?
18:03:34 <nirik> or apprentices with questions, suggestions, comments?
18:03:46 <mhurron> ya hi, I'm Sean, new here
18:04:05 <fale> I'm Fabio A Locati, an Italian freelance sysop, dba and I'm new here :)
18:04:14 <threebean> fale: hi :)
18:04:23 <nirik> welcome fale and mhurron. :)
18:04:24 <mhurron> I'm a sysadmin, know a little python, looking to help out
18:04:24 * threebean waves to mhurron
18:04:47 <nirik> question for both of you: are you more interested in sysadmin work? or application development? or both?
18:05:33 <mhurron> I know more sysadmin, I don't know if I can be useful for development, So more admin I suppose
18:05:35 <fale> nirik: a little bit more on sysadmin because I already have competence in the area so it would be easier to start from there for me
18:06:00 <nirik> ok, cool.
18:06:18 <nirik> If you are interested I can add you to our apprentice group after the meeting... see me in #fedora-admin and I can get you setup.
18:06:26 <fale> nirik: thankyou
18:06:34 <kushalk124> Hey, I am Kushal currently located in Germany, I plan to help in application development in python !
18:07:06 <nirik> kushalk124: welcome. Do see the kind folks in #fedora-apps after the meeting...
18:07:23 <kushal> kushalk124, also please say your full name or else people will be confused.
18:07:31 <kushalk124> nirik, Thanks :) I would definitely do so,
18:07:46 <kushalk124> kushal, Oh yes, Kushal Khandelwal here
18:08:06 <sborza> nirik: not sure if I'm already a member of the apprentice group, but would like to be added
18:08:17 <nirik> kushal: yeah... :)
18:08:29 <sborza> I've been out for a few weeks (new baby), but am now back and ready to contribute
18:08:39 <nirik> sborza: can check. ;) see me after the meeting in #fedora-admin and I can see...
18:08:49 <sborza> nirik: will do, thanks!
18:09:07 <pingou> sborza: and congratulation
18:09:09 <pingou> s
18:09:15 <pingou> :)
18:09:25 <nirik> cool. Any other new folks or apprentices with questions?
18:09:31 <sborza> pingou: thank you!
18:09:55 <nirik> #topic Applications status / discussion
18:10:08 <nirik> any applications side news or discussion this week? ;)
18:10:17 * pingou has been working on unit-tests for mirrormanager2
18:10:30 <nirik> I'll note that I sent out a email asking for status on various stuff... please do read it and reply if you have info on those items.
18:10:37 * pingou should
18:10:40 <threebean> pingou: thanks for that :)
18:11:21 <lmacken> I pushed out a new bodhi release to prod this week that contains bochecha's patches to work around the weird \n behavior that started happening after our postgres upgrade
18:11:28 <threebean> I'm aiming to get an FMN release out in the next week with lots of little enhancements and bugfixes all over. -- https://apps.fedoraproject.org/notifications
18:11:32 <pingou> threebean: got a couple of (simple) bugs so far :)
18:11:42 <lmacken> hopefully just a weird SQLObject issue that will be resolved with bodhi2 + SQLAlchemy
18:12:07 <nirik> lmacken: yeah. Oh, have you had a chance to try and setup bodhi2 on bodhi02.stg ? ;)
18:12:19 <nirik> #info lots of work on mirrormanager 2 unit tests.
18:12:31 <nirik> #info bodhi1 update out in production to fix db issue with newlines
18:12:42 <lmacken> threebean: will it support anitya filters?
18:12:44 <nirik> #info work on FMN to get it ready for prod
18:13:06 <lmacken> nirik: not yet, that's the goal for the next couple of weeks
18:13:08 <threebean> lmacken: sure will
18:13:14 <lmacken> threebean: excellent :)
18:14:14 <lmacken> having irc notifications for all upstream releases for all of my packages will be great
18:14:38 * nirik nods
18:14:45 * pingou likes
18:15:18 <nirik> we do have the f22 schedule from fesco now, so we will have to figure out when we want to land new apps/etc in production...
18:15:26 <nirik> and avoid freezes, etc
18:16:38 <nirik> anything else application wise?
18:16:41 <threebean> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/22/Schedule
18:16:52 <lmacken> bodhi atomic composes have been going smoothly :)
18:16:52 <nirik> yep
18:17:01 <threebean> wow, alpha freeze starts at end of february?
18:17:13 <threebean> it's always seems like such a short window inbetween.
18:17:14 <nirik> lmacken: excellent. Wonder how many people are consuming them... I guess as always we never know. ;)
18:17:24 <nirik> threebean: yeah, it's a short ramp. ;(
18:17:47 <lmacken> nirik: heh, yep
18:18:40 <nirik> #topic Sysadmin status / discussion
18:18:48 <nirik> ok, lets see... on the sysadmin side...
18:19:10 <threebean> ooo
18:19:12 <nirik> we are down to 53 hosts in puppet.
18:19:20 <pingou> \ó/
18:19:22 <nirik> threebean: your proxy01.stg seems to be mostly working well. ;)
18:19:33 <threebean> the proxy layer redone in ansible has been put in place in stg now. :)
18:19:38 <nirik> I wanted to get puiterwijk to look at the varnish config. I just hacked it up so it would work
18:19:38 <threebean> cool, cool. :)
18:19:58 <nirik> it also needs selinux work... (the varnish setup, won't start in enforcing)
18:20:31 <threebean> eh, yeah. we'll definitely want that for the front door.
18:20:57 <nirik> yeah, once thats sorted, I think we could look at making a proxy10 or something somewhere and adding it to the mix...
18:21:01 <threebean> haproxy needed some selinux help too, but that's nailed down now.
18:21:07 <nirik> cool.
18:21:50 <nirik> I think haproxy in stg is all green (aside gallery01.stg, which doesn't matter)
18:22:00 <nirik> https://admin.stg.fedoraproject.org/haproxy/proxy01
18:22:27 <threebean> could do a rube run too -- if anyone has some free time to mess with it.
18:22:31 <nirik> #info proxy01.stg needs a bit more work, but overall is looking great in ansible
18:22:37 <nirik> yeah, great idea
18:22:39 <threebean> maybe an apprentice?
18:22:49 <threebean> https://github.com/fedora-infra/rube
18:22:57 <nirik> sure... ^
18:23:11 <threebean> there's always something new broken with it each time I go back to mess with it.. but it's useful to figure out where we have fires burning we didn't know about.
18:23:18 <lmacken> threebean: yep, always.
18:23:27 <nirik> what happened with running it in jenkins?
18:23:31 <nirik> just too broken from run to run?
18:23:59 <threebean> nirik: yeah, and jenkins itself kept blipping out and I haven't made time to follow up on it.
18:24:05 <lmacken> looks like a virtualenv issue or something
18:24:09 <threebean> (if anyone wants to try running it.. use these instructions..)
18:24:11 <threebean> https://github.com/fedora-infra/rube/tree/develop/rube.fedora#running
18:24:26 <nirik> ok, fair enough
18:24:57 * lmacken got a stack trace when logging in to jenkins :(
18:25:02 <nirik> Also, I have been fighting a curl issue on f21... trying to move our builders to f21 but they sometimes hang in builds. ;(
18:25:05 <lmacken> javax.servlet.ServletException: java.lang.RuntimeException: Failed to serialize hudson.model.User#properties for class hudson.model.User
18:25:06 <webpigeon> oooh dear
18:25:13 <nirik> lmacken: ;(
18:25:16 * pingou ducks
18:25:31 <threebean> rock solid :p
18:25:43 <pingou> gotta love jenkins...
18:25:53 <threebean> I hear about teams doing really incredible stuff with jenkins, but it seems like we just don't have the person-power to keep it afloat.
18:26:06 <nirik> also this month we will be having some storage moving fun... no details or exact time yet, but hopefully this month... we will need an outage to move nfs server mounts.
18:26:26 <nirik> threebean: yeah. Keep wondering if buildbot would do better...
18:26:43 <nirik> #info storage moves likely later this month.
18:26:43 <lmacken> threebean: I think we'd have the same type of issue with elasticsearch
18:26:51 <lmacken> but I really want to use it :P
18:26:54 <nirik> #info smooge and nirik will be in phx2 datacenter in feb
18:27:09 * tflink might be able to help with buildbot
18:27:14 <smooge> hopefully :)
18:27:24 * smooge will be booking tickets later today
18:27:55 <pingou> the best point of Jenkins is its UI
18:28:07 <pingou> stability wise, we're not managing apparently :(
18:28:22 <nirik> there's also that mozilla one... tinderbox? dunno.
18:28:44 <lmacken> let's just run tests in taskotron :)
18:28:49 <pingou> \ó/
18:28:51 <tflink> the new UI for buildbot nine will be much better
18:29:06 <pingou> tempting :)
18:29:38 <nirik> tflink: oh, while you are around: any thoughts about moving taskotron clients and other stuff thats f20 now to f21? or rhel7? or you want to keep it with 20 for now and move at f22?
18:30:01 <tflink> http://nine.buildbot.net/
18:30:41 <tflink> I'd rather keep stuff as is for now - the bits we're currently working on will require some major client changes
18:31:01 <nirik> ok, fair enough. just wanted to mention it. '
18:31:01 <tflink> sorry for being late, still have the pre-DST meeting time in my head
18:32:24 <nirik> #topic nagios/alerts recap
18:32:44 <nirik> I've been trying to fix up things that alert, but hard to say if it's having too much effect. ;)
18:33:18 <nirik> just need to keep plugging away. ;)
18:33:20 <nirik> #topic Upcoming Tasks/Items
18:33:20 <nirik> https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/list/infrastructure/
18:33:31 <nirik> anything anyone has upcoming that they would like to schedule or discuss?
18:33:56 <pingou> dev-conf early february
18:33:59 <nirik> Do we want to look at a FAD for 2015? or is it too soon to talk about?
18:34:15 <nirik> pingou: you and puiterwijk are going?
18:34:16 <pingou> puiterwijk bochecha dgilmore and pbrobinson will be there
18:34:19 <pingou> and I
18:34:21 <nirik> ah, nice
18:34:29 <pingou> nirik: +1 for FAD
18:34:35 * pingou was thinking rel-eng tooling FAD
18:34:47 <threebean> also, PyCon US in April.
18:34:57 <threebean> pingou: and yeah, rel-eng tooling FAD would be sweet.
18:35:03 * nirik nods.
18:36:04 <nirik> #topic Open Floor
18:36:16 <nirik> anyone have anything for open floor? ideas, comments, suggestions?
18:36:47 * tflink is also going to be at devconf
18:36:53 <smooge> cool
18:36:55 <nirik> nice
18:37:27 * pingou adds tflink to the list :)
18:38:25 <nirik> alright, if nothing else will close things out in a minute...
18:38:32 <smooge> anyone going to be at FOSDEM?
18:38:55 <pingou> smooge: I will
18:39:28 <fale> smooge: I will if I'll be able to fit it with my exam schedule
18:39:47 <smooge> cool
18:40:00 <smooge> ok close it out
18:40:19 <nirik> alright. Thanks for coming everyone.
18:40:22 <nirik> #endmeeting
=============================================
#fedora-meeting: IRC Support SIG (2015-01-08)
=============================================
Meeting started by nirik at 17:00:34 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2015-01-08/irc-support-sig.…
.
Meeting summary
---------------
* init process (nirik, 17:00:35)
* Week(s) in review (nirik, 17:04:04)
* Open Floor (nirik, 17:08:01)
Meeting ended at 17:14:31 UTC.
Action Items
------------
Action Items, by person
-----------------------
* **UNASSIGNED**
* (none)
People Present (lines said)
---------------------------
* nirik (19)
* Khaytsus (4)
* zodbot (3)
* EvilBob (3)
* Southern_Gentlem (2)
* N3LRX (1)
--
17:00:34 <nirik> #startmeeting IRC Support SIG (2015-01-08)
17:00:34 <zodbot> Meeting started Thu Jan 8 17:00:34 2015 UTC. The chair is nirik. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
17:00:34 <zodbot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic.
17:00:35 <nirik> #meetingname irc-support-sig
17:00:35 <nirik> #topic init process
17:00:35 <zodbot> The meeting name has been set to 'irc-support-sig'
17:01:09 * N3LRX is here
17:01:11 * Khaytsus
17:01:32 * EvilBob
17:02:15 * nirik waves.
17:02:25 <nirik> will wait a min or two more for folks to wander in
17:03:55 <EvilBob> or wander out...
17:03:58 <EvilBob> ;)
17:04:04 <nirik> #topic Week(s) in review
17:04:06 <nirik> indeed. ;)
17:04:21 <nirik> so everything seemed pretty normal over the break... nothing too exciting to report.
17:04:36 <nirik> not really even all that much trouble with f21 installs/upgrades... IMHO.
17:04:47 <nirik> anyone have anything they would like to point out or trends, etc?
17:06:06 * Southern_Gentlem
17:06:56 * Khaytsus plays the taps for F19
17:07:11 <nirik> yeah, longest fedora release so far. ;)
17:07:25 <Southern_Gentlem> yep the Cat finial died
17:08:01 <nirik> #topic Open Floor
17:08:13 <nirik> anyone have any items for open floor? ideas, suggestions, comments?
17:08:34 <nirik> we haven't really been all that active lately... is that good, or is it bad because we aren't trying to improve? ;)
17:09:23 <Khaytsus> Seems like the latter, but
17:11:30 * nirik is fine with running smoothly/no drama, but I probibly jinxed it. ;)
17:12:07 <nirik> alright, if no one has anything, will close out in a minute or two
17:12:17 <Khaytsus> Well, quiet can be good. Maybe other things are compensating, like forums, ask, or even the overall product use has gotten better? Education of users?
17:13:21 <nirik> could be.
17:14:28 <nirik> ok, thanks for coming everyone. :)
17:14:31 <nirik> #endmeeting
==========================================
#fedora-blocker-review: F22-blocker-review
==========================================
Meeting started by roshi at 16:02:15 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2015-01-07/f22-block…
.
Meeting summary
---------------
* Roll Call (roshi, 16:02:16)
* Change blocker review time discussion (roshi, 16:05:41)
* AGREED: Hold next blocker review on Monday 2014-01-12 (roshi,
16:12:36)
* Introduction (roshi, 16:14:27)
* Our purpose in this meeting is to review proposed blocker and
nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept them, and to monitor
the progress of fixing existing accepted blocker and nice-to-have
bugs. (roshi, 16:14:28)
* We'll be following the process outlined at: (roshi, 16:14:31)
* LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting
(roshi, 16:14:34)
* The bugs up for review today are available at: (roshi, 16:14:36)
* LINK: http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current (roshi,
16:14:39)
* The criteria for release blocking bugs can be found at: (roshi,
16:14:41)
* LINK:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_22_Alpha_Release_Criteria
(roshi, 16:14:44)
* LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_22_Beta_Release_Criteria
(roshi, 16:14:47)
* LINK:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_22_Final_Release_Criteria
(roshi, 16:14:50)
* (1169019) UnicodeDecodeError: 'ascii' codec can't decode byte 0xe4 in
position 11: ordinal not in range(128) (roshi, 16:15:07)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169019 (roshi,
16:15:10)
* Proposed Blocker, anaconda, ASSIGNED (roshi, 16:15:13)
* AGREED: - 1169019 - AcceptedBlocker - This bug is a conditional
violation of the Alpha criterion: The installer must be able to
complete an installation to a single disk using automatic
partitioning. (roshi, 16:27:01)
* (1179362) boot.iso installs result in console login (roshi, 16:30:55)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179362 (roshi,
16:30:55)
* Proposed Blocker, anaconda, ASSIGNED (roshi, 16:30:56)
* AGREED: - 1179362 - AcceptedBlocker - This bug is a clear violation
of the Alpha Package Sets criterion: When doing a graphical install
using the dedicated installer images, the installer must be able to
install each of the release blocking desktops, as well as the
minimal package set. (roshi, 16:35:49)
* (1170803) calls e2fsck on all ext volumes, provides no status
indicator, and hangs indefinitely if e2fsck doesn't exit (roshi,
16:36:05)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170803 (roshi,
16:36:08)
* Proposed Blocker, e2fsprogs, NEW (roshi, 16:36:11)
* AGREED: - 1170803 - RejectedBlocker - This bug doesn't clearly
violate any criteria and looks to be getting worked on either way.
Please repropose if it's found to violate another criterion.
(roshi, 16:54:50)
* LINK:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_22_Beta_Release_Criteria#Initializatio…
(roshi, 16:55:24)
* (1166598) going back to installation destination picker swaps
partitions on disks (roshi, 16:55:37)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166598 (roshi,
16:55:40)
* Proposed Blocker, anaconda, ASSIGNED (roshi, 16:55:42)
* LINK: http://plantpoweredkitchen.com/recipes/recipe-mac-oh-geez/
(danofsatx|w, 17:01:11)
* AGREED: - 1166598 - Punt - It's not clear where this bug or the fix
currently stands. Punting until we have more information. (roshi,
17:12:00)
* (1177988) ConfigError: Repository updates has no mirror or baseurl
set. (roshi, 17:12:08)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177988 (roshi,
17:12:11)
* Proposed Blocker, anaconda, ASSIGNED (roshi, 17:12:14)
* AGREED: - 1177988 - AcceptedBlocker - This bug violates the Beta
criterion: The installer must be able to complete a scripted
installation which duplicates the default interactive installation
as closely as possible. (roshi, 17:20:55)
* (1170800) Please stop overwriting anaconda's stylesheet (roshi,
17:20:59)
* Proposed Blocker, fedora-productimg-server, NEW (roshi, 17:21:00)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170800 (roshi,
17:21:02)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176411 (adamw,
17:23:33)
* AGREED: - 1170800 - AcceptedBlocker - This bug breaks keyboard usage
for installation, and thus is a conditional violation of the
following Final criterion: Installer must be able to complete an
installation. (roshi, 17:29:56)
* (1170788) [abrt] gnome-shell: check_fontmap_changed(): gnome-shell
killed by SIGSEGV (roshi, 17:30:01)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170788 (roshi,
17:30:04)
* Proposed Blocker, gnome-shell, NEW (roshi, 17:30:06)
* AGREED: - 1170788 - Punt - This bug might have gone stale in the
past month. Will revisit next week after we've attempted to
reproduce with more recent media. (roshi, 17:35:53)
* (1175847) Missing high contrast icon for Documents (roshi, 17:36:03)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1175847 (roshi,
17:36:03)
* Proposed Blocker, gnome-themes-standard, NEW (roshi, 17:36:03)
* LINK:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_22_Final_Release_Criteria#Default_app…
(adamw, 17:41:44)
* AGREED: - 1175847 -AcceptedBlocker - This bug is a clear violation
of the Default application functionality criterion: All applications
installed by default in Fedora Workstation must comply with each
MUST and MUST NOT guideline in the Applications and Launchers
policy. (roshi, 17:44:28)
* Open Floor (roshi, 17:44:43)
Meeting ended at 17:48:29 UTC.
Action Items
------------
Action Items, by person
-----------------------
* **UNASSIGNED**
* (none)
People Present (lines said)
---------------------------
* roshi (193)
* sgallagh (43)
* danofsatx|w (32)
* kparal (25)
* pschindl (23)
* adamw (20)
* brunowolff (20)
* apatel (8)
* satellit_e (7)
* zodbot (4)
* mccann2 (3)
* nirik (1)
Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4
.. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot
--
// Mike
--
Fedora QA
freenode: roshi
http://roshi.fedorapeople.org
===================================
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2015-01-07)
===================================
Meeting started by sgallagh at 18:01:22 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2015-01-07/fesco.2015-01-07…
.
Meeting summary
---------------
* init process (sgallagh, 18:01:22)
* #1372 "Workstation" Product defaults to wide-open firewall (sgallagh,
18:04:36)
* AGREED: FESCo trusts the Workstation WG to properly research and
develop a sensible firewall solution and will stay out of the way.
(+5, 3, -0) (sgallagh, 18:40:04)
* sgallagh volunteers to act as a security consultant to the
Workstation team if they are interested. (sgallagh, 18:41:07)
* #1349 Fedora 22 scheduling strategy (and beyond) (sgallagh, 18:41:13)
* LINK: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/22/Schedule (mattdm,
18:43:55)
* change submission deadline in _less than two weeks_ (mattdm,
18:44:51)
* AGREED: FESCo would like for F22 to strictly adhere to a schedule,
rather than adjusting the schedule based on submitted features. We
intend to enforce the contingency plan very strictly this cycle (+8,
0, -0) (sgallagh, 19:04:19)
* Tentative date for side-tag merge is 2015-01-28 (sgallagh,
19:09:55)
* Tentative date for mass rebuild (if needed) is 2015-01-30
(sgallagh, 19:10:05)
* ACTION: jreznik to send schedule reminder announcement (sgallagh,
19:12:05)
* AGREED: FESCo approves the current proposed schedule with a planned
final delivery on 2015-05-19 (+8, 0, -0) (sgallagh, 19:15:08)
* #1198 Possible changes to Fedora EOL bug procedure (sgallagh,
19:17:46)
* F19 EOL warning will be sent today. We will auto-close all remaining
bugs in one month. (sgallagh, 19:28:14)
* #1378 F22 System Wide Change: Elasticsearch -
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Elasticsearch (sgallagh,
19:28:23)
* AGREED: Change is approved. The approach is OK, please resubmit with
a real contingency plan. (+7, 0, -1) (sgallagh, 19:51:03)
* #1379 F22 System Wide Change: Change xorg input stack to use libinput
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LibinputForXorg (sgallagh,
19:51:28)
* AGREED: Approved with two caveats: 1) Both GNOME and KDE must be
updated by the contingency date or it goes into effect and 2) the
contingency plan should note that it will may require reverting
changes to the control panels as well. (+7, 0, -0) (sgallagh,
19:57:46)
* #1380 F22 System Wide Change: wxPython 3 -
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/wxPython3 (sgallagh, 19:58:16)
* AGREED: Change is approved. (+7, 0, -0) (sgallagh, 20:04:45)
* Next week's chair (sgallagh, 20:04:53)
* mattdm to chair next week's meeting (sgallagh, 20:06:14)
* Elections (sgallagh, 20:06:19)
* LINK: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Elections (jreznik_pp,
20:07:08)
* LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Elections (sgallagh,
20:07:12)
* Elections will open for nominations on January 13th. Voting will
open on January 27th. (sgallagh, 20:11:57)
* Open Floor (sgallagh, 20:12:03)
Meeting ended at 20:13:30 UTC.
Action Items
------------
* jreznik to send schedule reminder announcement
Action Items, by person
-----------------------
* jreznik
* jreznik to send schedule reminder announcement
* **UNASSIGNED**
* (none)
People Present (lines said)
---------------------------
* sgallagh (196)
* mattdm (87)
* nirik (86)
* mitr (73)
* jreznik (71)
* jwb (68)
* t8m (60)
* kalev (35)
* thozza (27)
* hadess (22)
* drago01 (20)
* zodbot (18)
* jreznik_pp (13)
* twoerner (12)
* mcatanzaro (5)
* mclasen (5)
* mmaslano (0)
* stickster (0)
* dgilmore (0)
Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4
.. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot
Hi All,
We had first meeting of 2015 today.
*Following are the meeting minutes:*
=====================
#fedora-meeting: i18n
=====================
Meeting started by pravins at 06:00:19 UTC. The full logs are available
athttp://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2015-01-07/i18n.2015-01-0…
.
Meeting summary
---------------
* agenda and roll call (pravins, 06:00:32)
* LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/I18N/Meetings/2015-01-07
(pravins, 06:00:38)
* Upcoming schedule (pravins, 06:02:46)
* 2014-12-09 Fedora 21 Final Release (pravins, 06:02:52)
* 2015-01-20 Change Checkpoint: Proposal submission deadline
(System Wide Changes) (pravins, 06:02:52)
* no earlier than 2015-02-10 Branch Fedora 22 from Rawhide
(pravins, 06:02:52)
* Outstanding topic (pravins, 06:04:16)
* #36: gnome redesign plans for control-center Region and Languages
(i18n(a)lists.fedoraproject.org) (pravins, 06:04:20)
* LINK: https://fedorahosted.org/i18n/ticket/36 (pravins, 06:04:20)
* LINK:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2015-January/206011.html
(paragan, 06:08:21)
* If we move the Indian layouts into
/usr/share/X11/xkb/rules/base.extras.xml (pravins, 06:11:16)
* LINK:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2015-January/206011.html
(pravins, 06:12:03)
* ACTION: anish_ will contact to whot for blacklisting xkb indian
layouts in gnome (pravins, 06:13:54)
* In long term we need to come up with definite list of
deprecated/obscure layouts. (pravins, 06:16:26)
* ACTION: paragan to create list of xkb layout available in Fedora.
(pravins, 06:21:18)
* Outstanding task (pravins, 06:23:13)
* #35: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/I18N cleanup
(i18n(a)lists.fedoraproject.org) (pravins, 06:23:13)
* LINK: https://fedorahosted.org/i18n/ticket/35 (pravins, 06:23:13)
* LINK: http://piratepad.net/i18nchanges (pravins, 06:23:50)
* will add Ibus page link to /i18n/InputMethod page. (pravins,
06:33:28)
* New topics (pravins, 06:39:35)
* #39: Bugs corner (pravins) (pravins, 06:39:35)
* LINK: https://fedorahosted.org/i18n/ticket/39 (pravins, 06:39:35)
* LINK:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/fonts-bugs/2015-January/027474.ht…
(pravins, 06:40:33)
* ACTION: search why fedora-packager was removed from epel5 (pravins,
06:45:18)
* #40: Fedora 22 planning (pravins) (pravins, 06:48:33)
* LINK: https://fedorahosted.org/i18n/ticket/40 (pravins, 06:48:33)
* anish_ changing to self contained change name from devanglish to
minglish (marathi). (pravins, 06:57:27)
* ACTION: pravins to talk with siddhesh regarding Glibc_Unicode_7_0
change proposal. (pravins, 07:01:50)
* LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ibus_devanglish
(pravins, 07:02:40)
* LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DnfLangpacksPlugin
(pravins, 07:02:46)
* LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Lohit2_Odia_Telugu
(pravins, 07:02:56)
* #41: Need to check whether any F22 proposed change affect i18n
(pravins) (pravins, 07:03:36)
* LINK: https://fedorahosted.org/i18n/ticket/41 (pravins, 07:03:36)
* LINK: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ReplaceYumWithDNF
(pravins, 07:04:06)
* LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LibinputForXorg
(pravins, 07:04:54)
* LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/wxPython3 (pravins,
07:05:53)
* LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GHC_7.8 (pravins,
07:06:12)
* not direct impact of LibinputForXorg change on i18n (pravins,
07:11:49)
* New task (pravins, 07:11:52)
* #42: Fedora 22 i18n test day (tagoh) (pravins, 07:11:52)
* Open Floor (pravins, 07:19:50)
Meeting ended at 07:23:33 UTC.
Action Items
------------
* anish_ will contact to whot for blacklisting xkb indian layouts in
gnome
* paragan to create list of xkb layout available in Fedora.
* search why fedora-packager was removed from epel5
* pravins to talk with siddhesh regarding Glibc_Unicode_7_0 change
proposal.
Action Items, by person
-----------------------
* anish_
* anish_ will contact to whot for blacklisting xkb indian layouts in
gnome
* paragan
* paragan to create list of xkb layout available in Fedora.
* pravins
* pravins to talk with siddhesh regarding Glibc_Unicode_7_0 change
proposal.
* **UNASSIGNED**
* search why fedora-packager was removed from epel5
People Present (lines said)
---------------------------
* pravins (131)
* juhp (60)
* anish_ (18)
* paragan (13)
* mfabian (9)
* tagoh__ (6)
* zodbot (3)
* shilpa (1)
* ueno (1)
* fujiwarat (1)
* epico (1)
Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4
.. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot