8:52 p.m.
==================================
#fedora-meeting: Fedora QA meeting
==================================
Meeting started by adamw at 16:02:45 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2014-01-27/fedora-qa.2014...
.
Meeting summary
---------------
* Roll call (adamw, 16:02:55)
* Previous meeting follow-up (adamw, 16:05:55)
* "adamw to post a summary of our position on EOL to the FESCo ticket"
- I did that, see
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1198#comment:42 (adamw,
16:06:44)
* "adamw to post a mail to test@ highlighting things we can be working
on during the 'quiet time'" - did that too, see
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2014-January/120167.html
, thanks to viking for adding another suggestion (adamw, 16:07:57)
* Viking-Ice and roshi have started working on the QA community role
which merges bugtriaging and testing process QA community member
(adamw, 16:09:41)
* SELinux update discussion (adamw, 16:13:30)
* brunowolff notes 'make selinux updates spend longer in testing' is a
commonly suggested short term approach (adamw, 16:22:34)
* cmurf suggests per-package defaults for update release criteria
(adamw, 16:22:44)
* kparal suggests re-evaluating autopush and a minimum updates-testing
time for certain updates (adamw, 16:23:13)
* pingou suggests disallowing push to stable until update has made it
to -testing (adamw, 16:25:18)
* AGREED: while there are various little tweaks that could be
considered to the update policy and process as a 'response' to this,
we don't think any of them obviously solves the problem without
causing other problems, and we trust the selinux maintainers to
configure their updates more conservatively in future (adamw,
16:40:31)
* Unmaintained package discussion (adamw, 16:40:40)
* ACTION: viking-ice to look at a possible process for flagging
bitrotten packages as part of the larger triage process proposal
(adamw, 16:59:59)
* open floor (adamw, 17:01:08)
Meeting ended at 17:02:48 UTC.
Action Items
------------
* viking-ice to look at a possible process for flagging bitrotten
packages as part of the larger triage process proposal
Action Items, by person
-----------------------
* **UNASSIGNED**
* viking-ice to look at a possible process for flagging bitrotten
packages as part of the larger triage process proposal
People Present (lines said)
---------------------------
* adamw (79)
* Viking-Ice (50)
* cmurf (48)
* nirik (25)
* kparal (16)
* brunowolff (14)
* pingou (7)
* misc (5)
* roshi (5)
* zodbot (4)
* garretraziel (2)
* tflink (2)
* pschindl (2)
* mkrizek (1)
* haraldh (1)
* pwhalen (1)
Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4
.. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net