September 2008 - olpc - Fedora Mailing-Lists

squid - minor (but annoying) bug #463129

by Martin Langhoff

Similar to the httpd bug I mentioned before -- trivial fix, and I've included a patch. If a fix percolates in F9, it saves me from having to shipping a custom squid for what amounts to... 10 characters :-) Squid init script test the wrong configfile https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463129 Similar bug with apache2 - updated with the correct conffile after an initial misfire https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=204067 nudge nudge, wink wink... m -- martin.langhoff(a)gmail.com martin(a)laptop.org -- School Server Architect - ask interesting questions - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff

15 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

Arabeyes font packages

by subhodip biswas

Arabayes-core-fonts contain fonts which are split into Thabit and Mothanna fonts as per suggestion . These fonts are packaged against this ticket http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/8221 the review requests are : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462711 Anybody willing to review them ? -- Regards Subhodip Biswas GPG key : FAEA34AB Server : pgp.mit.edu http://subhodipbiswas.wordpress.com http:/www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/SubhodipBiswas

15 years, 7 months

2
1
0 / 0

Meeting minutes from yesterday

by Greg DeKoenigsberg

In brief: * Localized spins. Making this a lesser priority because Fedora will be on its own dedicated SD card, and space is no longer as much of a concern. * SD Card recommendation: it will be the SanDisk Extreme III. * Resolving pyxcom / xulrunner issues in Fedora. Should be in rawhide shortly (caillon allegedly built on 9/16, we will be able to test soon.) * Activities. gregdek will get a count of (have / still need / etc.) Jeremy continues to build these at a rapid pace. * Python bloat. Tomeu will send me a note regarding best practices on cutting bloat out of python/pygtk apps, and gdk will send around to various Python gurus. * installation path -- priority 2, since we're focusing on sd card, not onboard install * bug tracker -- we have a great tracking bug for Fedora on XO: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=461806&hide_resolved=1 See you next week. --g

15 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

Meeting going on NOW

by Greg DeKoenigsberg

Sorry for no earlier reminder, folks. Discussing various Fedora / OLPC efforts. Agenda: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/OLPC/Tasks See you if you can make it. --g

15 years, 7 months

4
4
0 / 0

httpd - minor (but annoying) bug #204067

by Martin Langhoff

It's trivial, and I've posted a new config file for it that fixes the issue. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=204067 if an httpd with this tiny fix percolates into updates, I won't have to carry a custom httpd rpm... :-) nudge nudge, wink wink... m ps: I could add a sneaky rm in a %post but deleting other packages' conffiles is... ugh! -- martin.langhoff(a)gmail.com martin(a)laptop.org -- School Server Architect - ask interesting questions - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff

15 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

OLPC vs Fedora packages

by Peter Robinson

Hi All, Is there a list or bugzilla tracking bug somewhere that tracks the divergent OLPC packages. I know there have been various lists in the past posted to p.f.o and mailing lists but I'm trying to work out for my own sanity (and so as not to double up on effort) whether there's a central spot where this is tracked. In particular for bugs where packages pull in extra not wanted dependencies such as perl. I know there have been various bugs filed in the past but are they tracked through an umbrella bug? Peter

15 years, 7 months

3
6
0 / 0

Re: Couple things I'm looking for help with... (revisor, GPG migration...)

by Martin Langhoff

On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 7:46 PM, Jeroen van Meeuwen <kanarip(a)kanarip.com> wrote: > the --isolinux-cfg helps here, doesn't it? Using ks=hd:LABEL=foo:ks.cfg in > one of the menu items should work like Chris and Jeremy mentioned... Yes it definitely does, thanks! We need a tiny patch to add a 2nd ks file - you'll see in the ticket I'd like to have one with "interactive" in it, and one without. >> Helping me figure out how to make a spin post-GPG-keys-change-drama - see >> http://marc.info/?l=fedora-devel-list&m=122109127113298&w=2 > I think I answered this; > http://marc.info/?l=fedora-devel-list&m=122114550831324&w=2 Indeed - thanks! Hadn't seen it when I posted :-) > All you really really need to do is make sure you include the new > fedora-release package for the new GPG keys to be on the installed system > and avoid needing to go through the transition of keys. Cool. > As far as the > installation is occurred, you'll hit BZ #998 (the installer doesn't verify > keys). >From what I read there, that'll just log warnings in install.log right? Good on Jeremy to reopen a <1000 bug. A while ago I managed to fix bug #33 (or around there) in Moodle. cheers, m -- martin.langhoff(a)gmail.com martin(a)laptop.org -- School Server Architect - ask interesting questions - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff

15 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

Re: Fedora on XO: testing!

by Rodrigo Padula de Oliveira

Greg Dekoenigsberg escreveu: > > On Thu, 11 Sep 2008, Rodrigo Padula de Oliveira wrote: > >> Greg Dekoenigsberg escreveu: >>> >>> If you have an XO and want to get Fedora running on it, this is the time >>> to try it. :) >>> >>> Jeremy has an image working, and has laid down the gauntlet: >>> http://katzj.livejournal.com/438184.html >>> >>> We have a testable image here: >>> http://katzj.fedorapeople.org/olpc/olpc-gnome.iso >>> >>> And we have a tracking bug to file bugs against: >>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=FedoraOnXO >>> >>> We also need a more formalized test plan. Not super-formal, but a basic >>> set of tasks that should "just work". Actually, I wonder: how much of >>> the typical testing for Fedora could simply be replicated for the XO? I >>> will ask the Fedora test folks. >> >> Can i test on XO B4 machines ?? Works ? > > Doubtful. :( > I know I still owe you a proposal; I'm discussing it with Sugar folks. > Are you willing to lead a team of test folks in Brazil? > > --g > Yes, i would like to lead the tests and to organize a Brazilian Sugar Community! By now, i'm presenting many lectures in many Brazilian states spreading the OLPC and Sugar. Thanks -- Rodrigo Padula de Oliveira M.Sc. Student - COPPE/UFRJ Fedora Community Manager - Latin America http://www.proyectofedora.org

15 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

Couple things I'm looking for help with... (revisor, GPG migration...)

by Martin Langhoff

Making a well tuned install menu. Not too complex, some minor patching of revisor and a shell script involved. You'll want good connectivity as testing involves building the CD :-) http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/8360 Helping me figure out how to make a spin post-GPG-keys-change-drama - see http://marc.info/?l=fedora-devel-list&m=122109127113298&w=2 cheers, m -- martin.langhoff(a)gmail.com martin(a)laptop.org -- School Server Architect - ask interesting questions - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff

15 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

Fedora on XO: testing!

by Greg DeKoenigsberg

If you have an XO and want to get Fedora running on it, this is the time to try it. :) Jeremy has an image working, and has laid down the gauntlet: http://katzj.livejournal.com/438184.html We have a testable image here: http://katzj.fedorapeople.org/olpc/olpc-gnome.iso And we have a tracking bug to file bugs against: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=FedoraOnXO We also need a more formalized test plan. Not super-formal, but a basic set of tasks that should "just work". Actually, I wonder: how much of the typical testing for Fedora could simply be replicated for the XO? I will ask the Fedora test folks. --g

15 years, 7 months

2
1
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

olpc September 2008