compcache-take2

[Yioryos Asprobounitis]

I'm trying to build compcache on an XO-1 running os850 and I get into troubles.
I know that there is something wrong with my setup since in my F11/2.6.30-running VM, the
compcache modules compile without a hitch.
I have rpmed in kernel-headers and kernel-devel from the os850 kernel and due to yum
limitations, I manually installed development tools. eg
gcc, make, automake, automake autoconf , bison, m4, elfutils, binutils, gettext,
ncurces-devel. flex, libtool, rpm-build, pkgconfig, strace, some_that_I_forget, and their
dependencies.   
Running make on the XO-1 gives me the attached huge error file that mostly suggests errors
in the assembler, missing asm files etc.
Any ideas what I'm missing/did wrong?
Thx.

[Jon Nettleton]

>  Any ideas what I'm missing/did wrong?
>  Thx. 
I posted patches to fix this on the xo 1.5 kernels a while ago.  My
guess is that they did not make it into the xo-1 rpm specfile yet.

what do you get if you run this command?

ls -ald /usr/src/kernels/`uname -r`-i586/include/asm*


-Jon

[Yioryos Asprobounitis]

--- On Mon, 8/9/10, Jon Nettleton <jon.nettleton(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote:

>  From: Jon Nettleton <jon.nettleton(a)gmail.com&gt;
>  Subject: Re: compcache-take2
>  To: "Yioryos Asprobounitis" <mavrothal(a)yahoo.com&gt;
>  Cc: fedora-olpc-list(a)redhat.com
>  Date: Monday, August 9, 2010, 8:40 PM
>  > Any ideas what I'm missing/did
>  wrong?
>  > Thx.
>  
>  I posted patches to fix this on the xo 1.5 kernels a while
>  ago.  My
>  guess is that they did not make it into the xo-1 rpm
>  specfile yet.
>  
>  what do you get if you run this command?
>  
>  ls -ald /usr/src/kernels/`uname -r`-i586/include/asm* 
...../asm-generic  Only.

>  
>  
>  -Jon
>

[Jon Nettleton]

> >
> > I posted patches to fix this on the xo 1.5 kernels a while
> > ago.  My
> > guess is that they did not make it into the xo-1 rpm
> > specfile yet.
> >
> > what do you get if you run this command?
> >
> > ls -ald /usr/src/kernels/`uname -r`-i586/include/asm*
>
>  ...../asm-generic  Only.
>  
Okay we need to get the appropriate changes applied to to the XO1
kernel.  I would suggest filing a bug on http://dev.laptop.org

Jon

[Yioryos Asprobounitis]

--- On Tue, 8/10/10, Jon Nettleton <jon.nettleton(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote:

>  From: Jon Nettleton <jon.nettleton(a)gmail.com&gt;
>  Subject: Re: compcache-take2
>  To: "Yioryos Asprobounitis" <mavrothal(a)yahoo.com&gt;
>  Cc: fedora-olpc-list(a)redhat.com
>  Date: Tuesday, August 10, 2010, 12:47 AM
>  >>
>  >> I posted patches to fix this on the xo 1.5 kernels
>  a while
>  >> ago.  My
>  >> guess is that they did not make it into the xo-1
>  rpm
>  >> specfile yet.
>  >>
>  >> what do you get if you run this command?
>  >>
>  >> ls -ald /usr/src/kernels/`uname
>  -r`-i586/include/asm*
>  >
>  > ...../asm-generic  Only.
>  >
>  
>  Okay we need to get the appropriate changes applied to to
>  the XO1
>  kernel.  I would suggest filing a bug on http://dev.laptop.org 
I will, but can you tell me the changes or point to the patch in the mean time? 
I'm on the road and my web access is very spotty.
Thx

>  
>  Jon
>

[Yioryos Asprobounitis]

--- On Tue, 8/10/10, Jon Nettleton <jon.nettleton(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote:

>  From: Jon Nettleton <jon.nettleton(a)gmail.com&gt;
>  Subject: Re: compcache-take2
>  To: "Yioryos Asprobounitis" <mavrothal(a)yahoo.com&gt;
>  Cc: fedora-olpc-list(a)redhat.com
>  Date: Tuesday, August 10, 2010, 12:47 AM
>  >>
>  >> I posted patches to fix this on the xo 1.5 kernels
>  a while
>  >> ago.  My
>  >> guess is that they did not make it into the xo-1
>  rpm
>  >> specfile yet.
>  >>
>  >> what do you get if you run this command?
>  >>
>  >> ls -ald /usr/src/kernels/`uname
>  -r`-i586/include/asm*
>  >
>  > ...../asm-generic  Only.
>  >
>  
>  Okay we need to get the appropriate changes applied to to
>  the XO1
>  kernel.  I would suggest filing a bug on http://dev.laptop.org 
I filed a bug some time now (#10297) and tried to find the patch you are referring but no
luck.
Would it be possible to post the patch link here or be a bit more specific about the
original post?
Thanks

>  
>  Jon
>