Fedora Sugar Packaging Queue

[Sebastian Dziallas]

Hi all,

I'd like to take the chance to hint once more at our tracking bug [1], 
as well as the activity wiki page [2]. Recently, TamTam has been posted 
for review, too. I'm a little disappointed with the speed we're 
progressing with.

Here's a list of the currently most important things we need to get in.

Settings Manager - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563598
NoDM - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559559

TamTam Suite - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=564425
Typing Turtle - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559213

Other reviews still require action, either by the packager or the 
reviewer. I'm going to ping the owners directly.

In other news, we're being blocked by licensing issues for some 
activities and the boot screen, as I've posted before.

If you get a second, please go ahead and help to unblock us here - for 
example by reviewing a package (these aren't really that complicated, so 
it shouldn't take too long) or by packaging an activity from the list.

Thanks,
--Sebastian

[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=558617
[2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Sugar_Activities

[James Cameron]

On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 09:11:02PM +0100, Sebastian Dziallas wrote:
>  In other news, we're being blocked by licensing issues for some 
>  activities and the boot screen, as I've posted before. 
I've recently submitted patches to bugs.sugarlabs.org for two activities
because we had identified them in dev.laptop.org bugs as having
inadequately described licenses in code and packaging, but are there
other activities that need this review?

-- 
James Cameron
http://quozl.linux.org.au/

[Sugar-devel] Fedora Sugar Packaging Queue

[Peter Robinson]

On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 6:50 AM, James Cameron <quozl(a)laptop.org&gt; wrote:

>  On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 09:11:02PM +0100, Sebastian Dziallas wrote:
>  > In other news, we're being blocked by licensing issues for some
>  > activities and the boot screen, as I've posted before.
>
>  I've recently submitted patches to bugs.sugarlabs.org for two activities
>  because we had identified them in dev.laptop.org bugs as having
>  inadequately described licenses in code and packaging, but are there
>  other activities that need this review?
>
>  
Bug numbers?

Peter

[Sugar-devel] Fedora Sugar Packaging Queue

[James Cameron]

On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 09:42:43AM +0800, Peter Robinson wrote:
>  Bug numbers? 
SL#1571 for Pippy, just a tiny fix.
SL#1695 for Physics, with a detailed review.

-- 
James Cameron
http://quozl.linux.org.au/

[Sugar-devel] Fedora Sugar Packaging Queue

[Sebastian Dziallas]

James Cameron wrote:
>  On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 09:11:02PM +0100, Sebastian Dziallas wrote:
> > In other news, we're being blocked by licensing issues for some
> > activities and the boot screen, as I've posted before.
>
>  I've recently submitted patches to bugs.sugarlabs.org for two activities
>  because we had identified them in dev.laptop.org bugs as having
>  inadequately described licenses in code and packaging, but are there
>  other activities that need this review? 
First, I wanted to thank you for doing this!

Well, I'd love to see the Physics one being finally pushed. There was 
another one but the maintainer fixed it directly. I'll holler if there's 
more (which I presume we'll come across, yes).

--Sebastian

[Sugar-devel] Fedora Sugar Packaging Queue

[Bert Freudenberg]

On 12.02.2010, at 12:11, Sebastian Dziallas wrote:
>  
>  Hi all,
>  
>  I'd like to take the chance to hint once more at our tracking bug [1],  
>  [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=558617 
This should also depend on #520294.

- Bert -

[Sugar-devel] Fedora Sugar Packaging Queue

[Sebastian Dziallas]

Bert Freudenberg wrote:
>  On 12.02.2010, at 12:11, Sebastian Dziallas wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'd like to take the chance to hint once more at our tracking bug [1],
>
> > [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=558617
>
>  This should also depend on #520294.
>
>  - Bert - 
Cool! Wasn't aware of that - thanks & added. ;)

--Sebastian