July 2009 - rel-eng - Fedora Mailing-Lists

#2017: gnonlin-0.10.11.2-0.2.fc11

by Fedora Release Engineering

#2017: gnonlin-0.10.11.2-0.2.fc11 ---------------------+------------------------------------------------------ Reporter: jcollie | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Type: task | Status: new Milestone: | Component: koji Keywords: | ---------------------+------------------------------------------------------ Please tag gnonlin-0.10.11.2-0.2.fc11 into the f11 buildroot override so that I can build a new version of PiTiVi -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/2017> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

14 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

#2014: Tag augeas-0.5.2 for inclusion in F11 and F10 buildroots

by Fedora Release Engineering

#2014: Tag augeas-0.5.2 for inclusion in F11 and F10 buildroots --------------------+------------------------------------------------------- Reporter: lutter | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Type: task | Status: new Milestone: | Component: koji Keywords: | --------------------+------------------------------------------------------- I want to build a new package (netcf) for F11 and F10; it requires augeas-0.5.2, which is in updates-testing, but not yet in updates for F11 and F10. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/2014> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

14 years, 10 months

1
3
0 / 0

#2015: new versions of corosync/openais/cluster required to build packages in F11

by Fedora Release Engineering

#2015: new versions of corosync/openais/cluster required to build packages in F11 ----------------------+----------------------------------------------------- Reporter: fabbione | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Type: task | Status: new Milestone: | Component: koji Keywords: | ----------------------+----------------------------------------------------- Hi all, as previously announced here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-June/msg00658.html all the packages are already in rawhide and we need to update F11 (and later on F10). The build sequence is as follow: corosync-1.0.0-1.fc11.src.rpm openais-1.0.0-1.fc11.src.rpm cluster-3.0.0-20.fc11.src.rpm (other packages don't need rel-eng help) corosync is already tag and built in koji please buildroot override request for corosync-1.0.0-1.fc11 openais needs to be done next. It is already tagged in CVS but cannot build without corosync. Once corosync is overriden I can either build openais or rel-eng can do it. please buildroot override request for openais-1.0.0-1.fc11 (after it's built) cluster needs to go next. It is already tagged in CVS but cannot build without corosync and openais. Once openais is overriden I can either build cluster or rel-eng can do it. once those 3 packages are overriden, I can take care to build the other components. Thanks a lot in advance. Fabio -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/2015> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

14 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

#2013: Please remove urlgfe from rawhide branch

by Fedora Release Engineering

#2013: Please remove urlgfe from rawhide branch -----------------------------+---------------------------------------------- Reporter: mtasaka | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Type: task | Status: new Milestone: Fedora 12 Final | Component: koji Keywords: | -----------------------------+---------------------------------------------- Well, I noticed that today Jesse was going to rebuild urlgfe as F-12 Mass rebuild.[[BR]] urlgfe was renamed to uget by the upstream, and uget is already available on Fedora since 2009-05-04 and maintained by me, I just forgot to take orphan package process...[[BR]] So please remove urlgfe from rawhide branch, thank you. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/2013> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

14 years, 10 months

1
1
0 / 0

Re: Updated Fedora 12 Schedule (take 2)

by John Poelstra

Mark McLoughlin said the following on 07/24/2009 05:55 AM Pacific Time: > Hi John, > > (Cc-ing fedora-devel-list, surprised to see the schedule hasn't been > posted there) It was approved by FESCo in May https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/143 and should have appeared on fedora-devel as part of the meeting recap. The schedules below are detailed schedules for a specific team. There were no changes to the major milestones originally approved: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/12/Schedule > On Mon, 2009-07-13 at 21:09 -0700, John Poelstra wrote: > >> http://poelstra.fedorapeople.org/schedules/f-12/f-12-releng-tasks.html >> http://poelstra.fedorapeople.org/schedules/f-12/f-12-releng.ics > > In the F-11 schedule, we had 85 days between Feature Freeze and GA. And > then GA slipped by two weeks. > In the F-12 schedule, we now have 99 days between Feature Freeze and GA. For Fedora 12 An extra week was added to accommodate Linux plumbers conference, etc...https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/1271 In addition there are four weeks in the Fedora 12 schedule for Alpha (previously known as Beta) versus the three weeks in Fedora 11--this was an oversight in the setting of the Fedora 11 schedule which did not allow for three weekly snapshots. > This seriously cuts into development time, and we already have a shorter > releases cycle. This is one of the reasons it was discussed almost a month or more before the GA of Fedora 11. > > Why is that? To get back on the regular "Halloween/May Day" release schedule. The original alpha (as we used to know it) was dropped by Releng in an effort to add more development time back... this was discussed on fedora-devel. John

14 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

Re: Updated Fedora 12 Schedule (take 2)

by Bill Nottingham

Mark McLoughlin (markmc(a)redhat.com) said: > > http://poelstra.fedorapeople.org/schedules/f-12/f-12-releng-tasks.html > > http://poelstra.fedorapeople.org/schedules/f-12/f-12-releng.ics > > In the F-11 schedule, we had 85 days between Feature Freeze and GA. And > then GA slipped by two weeks. > > In the F-12 schedule, we now have 99 days between Feature Freeze and GA. > > This seriously cuts into development time, and we already have a shorter > releases cycle. > > Why is that? At least one week of this (that I recall) is to have the feature freeze be a week before the 'code freeze' for the milestone; the idea is that to avoid the 'all features land at once, and we have to spend a week cleaning them up' problem. Bill

14 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

#2010: koji build "stuck", and needs killing

by Fedora Release Engineering

#2010: koji build "stuck", and needs killing ---------------------+------------------------------------------------------ Reporter: jgarzik | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Type: task | Status: new Milestone: | Component: koji Keywords: | ---------------------+------------------------------------------------------ It is highly likely that my koji chain-build is stuck on ppc and ppc64, and needs to be killed. But also -- before killing, can someone take a quick glance at what is actually going on? i.e. what processes are running -- and are they sleeping or running at 100% CPU? http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1493248 -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/2010> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

14 years, 10 months

1
2
0 / 0

#2008: epiphany-2.26.3-2.fc11 not pushed??

by Fedora Release Engineering

#2008: epiphany-2.26.3-2.fc11 not pushed?? ---------------------+------------------------------------------------------ Reporter: mtasaka | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Type: task | Status: new Milestone: | Component: koji Keywords: | ---------------------+------------------------------------------------------ There is a information that epiphany-2.26.3-2.fc11 (rebuilt with xulrunner 1.9.1.1) is pushed into F-11 updates stable [1][2], however as far as I checked 2 mirrors [3][4] this epiphany does not appear (although other packages rebuilt against xulrunner 1.9.1.1 already appear) and it seems that people are complaining about this [5][[BR]] [[BR]] [1] [https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-7898] [2] [https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package- announce/2009-July/msg00904.html] [3] [http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/updates/11/i386/] [4] [http://mirrors.tummy.com/pub/fedora.redhat.com/fedora/linux/updates/11/i386/] [5] [https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2009-July/msg02514.html] -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/2008> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

14 years, 10 months

1
2
0 / 0

#1963: claws-mail 3.7.2 tag request for override

by Fedora Release Engineering

#1963: claws-mail 3.7.2 tag request for override ------------------+--------------------------------------------------------- Reporter: awjb | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Type: task | Status: new Milestone: | Component: koji Keywords: | ------------------+--------------------------------------------------------- Could someone please tag claws-mail-3.7.2-1.fc10 and claws-mail-3.7.2-1.fc11 for override. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/1963> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

14 years, 10 months

1
6
0 / 0

#2005: Please block clutter-cairo from rawhide/F-12 as its obsolete

by Fedora Release Engineering

#2005: Please block clutter-cairo from rawhide/F-12 as its obsolete -----------------------------+---------------------------------------------- Reporter: pbrobinson | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Type: task | Status: new Milestone: Fedora 12 Alpha | Component: koji Keywords: | -----------------------------+---------------------------------------------- As per the dead.package guidelines please block clutter-cairo as its obsolete and its functionality has been merged into the main clutter library during the 0.9 release cycle. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/2005> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

14 years, 10 months

1
2
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

rel-eng July 2009