rel-eng April 2016

rel-eng@lists.fedoraproject.org

11 participants
95 discussions

#6210: new build of fedora:{21, 22} docker images needed for CVE-2015-1793
by Fedora Release Engineering 14 Nov '16

14 Nov '16

#6210: new build of fedora:{21,22} docker images needed for CVE-2015-1793 ------------------+------------------------ Reporter: lsm5 | Owner: rel-eng@… Type: task | Status: new Milestone: | Component: koji Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | ------------------+------------------------ The fedora docker images are affected by CVE-2015-1793. Please see: https://github.com/docker-library/official-images/issues/878 and https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2015-1793 for details. Need new builds of these images to take care of it. (Looks like the rawhide image is affected too) -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6210> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

1 2

#6219: Need updated cloud images for Fedora 22
by Fedora Release Engineering 14 Nov '16

14 Nov '16

#6219: Need updated cloud images for Fedora 22 -----------------------------+------------------------ Reporter: kushal | Owner: rel-eng@… Type: task | Status: new Milestone: Fedora 22 Final | Component: other Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | -----------------------------+------------------------ Hi, I have tested the following tree with the formal tests. Please do a release of the updated cloud images from this tree. http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/22-20150720/Cloud- Images/x86_64/Images/ -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6219> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

1 3

#6252: please create a rawhide and f23 side tag for llvm updates
by Fedora Release Engineering 14 Nov '16

14 Nov '16

#6252: please create a rawhide and f23 side tag for llvm updates -----------------------------+------------------------ Reporter: airlied | Owner: rel-eng@… Type: task | Status: new Milestone: Fedora 23 Final | Component: git Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | -----------------------------+------------------------ Hi guys, I want to update llvm to 3.7 in rawhide and f23, but I'd like to build all the deps in a side tag first to make sure. Can you create two tags? Dave. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6252> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

1 8

#6361: usage of localPkg along with xml:base
by Fedora Release Engineering 14 Nov '16

14 Nov '16

#6361: usage of localPkg along with xml:base -----------------------------+------------------------ Reporter: jsilhan | Owner: rel-eng@… Type: task | Status: new Milestone: Fedora 24 Alpha | Component: koji Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | -----------------------------+------------------------ Recently we've noticed that many users report DNF problems when package is downloaded but then cannot be found in downloaded location [1]. We've investigated that the root of the issue is inside `localPkg()`. From the doc string of the function: ``` Package's location in the filesystem. For packages in remote repo returns where the package will be/has been downloaded. ``` patch [2] of localPkg() broke package installation from repositories that contain xml:base tag. As this function was not intended to return a remote url of package and also is not part of our API we plan to revert your patch. DNF uses this function internally and should really represent DOWNLOADED location on the filesystem. Does koji use this DNF function directly? Of course we would like to keep the koji running properly but we would like to fix the DNF installing issue [1] too. Let's find the solution for both DNF and koji. Can you elaborate how do you use DNF along with `xml:base` tag. please? [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1257965 [2] http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/dnf.git/commit/?id=85b88dbcae497129… -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6361> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

1 4

#6399: Add workstation ostree repository
by Fedora Release Engineering 14 Nov '16

14 Nov '16

#6399: Add workstation ostree repository -----------------------------+------------------------ Reporter: mclasen | Owner: rel-eng@… Type: task | Status: new Milestone: Fedora 24 Alpha | Component: koji Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | -----------------------------+------------------------ The Workstation WG is adopting rpm-ostree as an alternative delivery mechanism for the Fedora Workstation product. For more details, see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/WorkstationOstree We have a working rpm-ostree-toolbox configuration here: https://pagure.io /atomic-workstation-config A temporary repository built from this configuration is here: http://209.132.179.147/repo We would like to have this repository built and hosted by Fedora rel-eng, ideally with daily updates from rawhide repositories (and eventually, the f25 branch). We also want to ship an installer iso for this, but we haven't produced a working installer with rpm-ostree-toolbox yet. The iso is only needed for major milestones (beta, GA), we don't need frequent releases like Atomic does. The only architecture we are interested in atm is x86_64. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6399> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

1 11

#6375: Old kickstart being used for f24 games spin
by Fedora Release Engineering 14 Nov '16

14 Nov '16

#6375: Old kickstart being used for f24 games spin -----------------------------+------------------------ Reporter: bruno | Owner: rel-eng@… Type: task | Status: new Milestone: Fedora 24 Alpha | Component: koji Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | -----------------------------+------------------------ Something changed and put the games spin oversize. I suspect it was adding firefox to XFCE because midori has been broken for quite a while now. For the alpha I'd rather cut firefox then one of the games. So a bit over a week ago I committed a change to the f24 branch to not use firefox for the games spin (not XFCE). The compose is not using this change yet. So I am guessing there is a process change in getting updates to kickstart files into the composes. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6375> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

1 1

#6368: Update notice FEDORA-EPEL-2016-76a5e741ab (from epel-testing) is broken, or a bad duplicate, skipping.
by Fedora Release Engineering 14 Nov '16

14 Nov '16

#6368: Update notice FEDORA-EPEL-2016-76a5e741ab (from epel-testing) is broken, or a bad duplicate, skipping. -----------------------------+------------------------ Reporter: orion | Owner: rel-eng@… Type: defect | Status: new Milestone: Fedora 24 Alpha | Component: epel Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | -----------------------------+------------------------ {{{ Update notice FEDORA-EPEL-2016-03296ba46a (from epel-testing) is broken, or a bad duplicate, skipping. You should report this problem to the owner of the epel-testing repository. Update notice FEDORA-EPEL-2016-3f3fffda5a (from epel-testing) is broken, or a bad duplicate, skipping. Update notice FEDORA-EPEL-2016-113e6f16ed (from epel-testing) is broken, or a bad duplicate, skipping. Update notice FEDORA-EPEL-2016-753f23fd38 (from epel-testing) is broken, or a bad duplicate, skipping. Update notice FEDORA-EPEL-2016-7f512b1888 (from epel-testing) is broken, or a bad duplicate, skipping. Update notice FEDORA-EPEL-2016-0ef5e7ce16 (from epel-testing) is broken, or a bad duplicate, skipping. Update notice FEDORA-EPEL-2016-04e0db37c1 (from epel-testing) is broken, or a bad duplicate, skipping. Update notice FEDORA-EPEL-2016-e98c5e3ab9 (from epel-testing) is broken, or a bad duplicate, skipping. Update notice FEDORA-EPEL-2016-76a5e741ab (from epel-testing) is broken, or a bad duplicate, skipping. }}} -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6368> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

1 5

#6355: Latest createImage task used old spin-kickstarts commit
by Fedora Release Engineering 14 Nov '16

14 Nov '16

#6355: Latest createImage task used old spin-kickstarts commit -----------------------------+------------------------ Reporter: jlebon | Owner: rel-eng@… Type: task | Status: new Milestone: Fedora 24 Alpha | Component: koji Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | -----------------------------+------------------------ The latest Fedora Cloud Atomic 23 image released yesterday was produced from an out of date kickstart file. The associated koji task is: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13102744 Judging by the name of the ks file ("fedora-cloud-atomic-2878aa0.ks"), it seems like it used commit 2878aa0 of the spin-kickstarts repo, which is *not* the current HEAD (current HEAD is 6641de0, committed 5 days ago). -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6355> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

1 1

#6344: Strange issue on php-JsonSchema-1.6.1-1.fc22
by Fedora Release Engineering 14 Nov '16

14 Nov '16

#6344: Strange issue on php-JsonSchema-1.6.1-1.fc22 -----------------------------+------------------------ Reporter: remi | Owner: rel-eng@… Type: task | Status: new Milestone: Fedora 24 Alpha | Component: koji Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | -----------------------------+------------------------ Yesterday, I received a bodhi notification: php-JsonSchema-1.6.1-1.fc22 ejected from the push because u"Cannot find relevant tag for php-JsonSchema-1.6.1-1.fc22. None of ['f22-updates- testing', 'f22-updates-testing-pending'] are in [u'epel7-testing- candidate', u'dist-6E-epel-testing-candidate', u'dist-5E-epel-testing- candidate', u'f22-updates-candidate', u'f23-updates-candidate', u'f21 -updates-candidate']." According to http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=713713 Pakage is tag f22-updates-testing According to https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-59f94c4aea Update is "locked" and pending. Can you please check ? -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6344> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

1 6

#6184: suitesparse can't be installed in ppc64 el6 buildroots
by Fedora Release Engineering 07 Nov '16

07 Nov '16

#6184: suitesparse can't be installed in ppc64 el6 buildroots -----------------------------+------------------------ Reporter: rmattes | Owner: rel-eng@… Type: defect | Status: new Milestone: Fedora 23 Final | Component: epel Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | -----------------------------+------------------------ I'm running into trouble building GeographicLib in epel6. GeographicLib requires octave, which in turn requires suitesparse. It looks like suitesparse was in epel for a while, but got absorbed into rhel at some point and blocked from the buildroots. Since centos doesn't provide ppc64 packages, the ppc64 octave package in epel now has missing dependencies on suitesparse libraries and can't be installed in koji. What's the best way forward for this issue? Is it to: - Unblock the epel6 suitesparse and make it exclusivearch ppc64? - Rebuild all of the dependencies of suitesparse to excludearch ppc64? - Make octave-GeographicLib excludearch ppc64 and ignore the issue entirely? Please advise. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6184> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

1 3

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

rel-eng April 2016