[pungi-fedora] Issue #426: Convert file sync from one-liner to durable shell
script
by Kellin
kellin reported a new issue against the project: `pungi-fedora` that you are following:
``
The way we rsync composes today is a one-liner bash script that is not very durable and requires that a release engineer babysit it through the entire four hour rsync process.
I am going to make this more durable, however, it will also slightly change our process behind the scenes.
Today if a process works or is DOOMED after a full run it is assigned an RC release number. (EG: 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, etc). If the compose fails quickly from something such as a failure to have signed packages then it will not be assigned a release candidate.
Per @mohanboddu there is not a durable way to identify the all of the different ways the special case DOOMed composes occur so they will be assigned an RC number after the automation is deployed.
The only visible change will be extra gaps in the RC composes in /pub/alt/stage that represent these extra numbers being inserted to the sequence.
@mohanboddu is fine with this change; does anyone else have objections?
@ausil , @kevin , @puiterwijk please let me know. The initial script PR will be coming within the next two business days.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/issue/426
8 months, 1 week
[pungi-fedora] Issue #740: composeinfo file in Fedora Rawhid
by Mike Boswell
mboswell reported a new issue against the project: `pungi-fedora` that you are following:
``
We started having Beaker import issues around July 17th. There seems to be a mismatch in the .composeinfo file and the compose. I was able to successfully import secondary Rawhide w/ the following edit:
[variant-Everything]
-arches = ppc64le,s390x
+arches = ppc64le,i386,s390x
id = Everything
name = Everything
type = variant
Below was the error prior to manual edit of composeinfo.
[root@fedmsg fedmsg]# beaker-import --dry-run --lab-controller=http://lab-02.rhts.eng.bos.redhat.com:8000 http://download.eng.bos.redhat.com/fedmsg/dumpdata/secondary/Fedora-Rawhi... ftp://download.
eng.bos.redhat.com/fedmsg/dumpdata/secondary/Fedora-Rawhide-20190725.n.0 nfs://aoe-cluster.lab.bos.redhat.com:/ibm/exports/fedmsg/dumpdata/secondary/Fedora-Rawhide-20190725.n.0
2019-07-26 15:29:27,072 root INFO Dry Run only, no data will be sent to beaker
2019-07-26 15:29:27,205 root INFO Attempting to import: http://download.eng.bos.redhat.com/fedmsg/dumpdata/secondary/Fedora-Rawhi...
2019-07-26 15:29:27,226 root INFO Attempting to import: http://download.eng.bos.redhat.com/fedmsg/dumpdata/secondary/Fedora-Rawhi...
2019-07-26 15:29:27,273 root INFO Fedora-Rawhide-20190725.n.0 Everything ppc64le added to beaker.
2019-07-26 15:29:27,293 root INFO Attempting to import: http://download.eng.bos.redhat.com/fedmsg/dumpdata/secondary/Fedora-Rawhi...
2019-07-26 15:29:27,367 root CRITICAL No section: 'images-i386'
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/issue/740
1 year, 1 month
[releng] Issue #8569: Side tag for llvm rebase in Rawhide
by Tom Stellard
tstellar reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following:
``
* Describe the issue
We need a side tag (f31-llvm) for the upcoming llvm rebase in Fedora
* When do you need this? (YYYY/MM/DD)
07/29/2019
* When is this no longer needed or useful? (YYYY/MM/DD)
08/29/2019
* If we cannot complete your request, what is the impact?
Temporary breakage in rawhide when the LLVM rebase occurs.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8569
1 year, 4 months
[releng] Issue #8664: Module mass-rebuild for F32 Rawhide needed
by Stephen Gallagher
sgallagh reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following:
``
* Describe the issue
At the Branch point, we need to perform a mass-rebuild of modular content so that they can be rebuilt against the new base module (in this case `platform:f32`). This does not seem to have happened during the F31 Branch from Rawhide, as https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/rawhide/Fedora-Rawhide-2019082... shows only those modules whose maintainers have done a manual rebuild since the Branch.
* When do you need this? (YYYY/MM/DD)
Immediately (2019-08-21)
* When is this no longer needed or useful? (YYYY/MM/DD)
When F32 goes EOL
* If we cannot complete your request, what is the impact?
Upgrade path on Rawhide will be broken for anyone with modules enabled. (That means pretty much everyone at this point).
CC @kevin
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8664
1 year, 4 months
[releng] Issue #8702: F31 stable push requests
by Adam Williamson
adamwill reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following:
``
This ticket will be used for requesting pushes of tested blocker / freeze exception fixes during F31 release freezes. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_blocker_bug_process and https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_freeze_exception_bug_process . Similar to candidate compose request tickets, this ticket can be closed by releng after each push and re-opened by QA each time a new push is needed.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8702
1 year, 4 months
[releng] Issue #8684: Create F32FTBFS and F32FailsToInstall Bugzilla trackers
by Miro Hrončok
churchyard reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following:
``
* Describe the issue
According to the Fails to build and Fails to install policy, we need new Buzgilla trackers for Fedora 32.
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fai...
* When do you need this?
After Fedora 31 was branched (already happened).
* When is this no longer needed or useful?
When Fedora 32 goes EOL.
* If we cannot complete your request, what is the impact?
We cannot properly track F32 install and build failures.
----
I know I can create the bugizllas myself, but last time i did, it created confusion during teh mass rebuild. So I'd prefer if releng creates them. It also looks better if the trackers are created by the releng account.
Thanks
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8684
1 year, 4 months