qulogic reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following:
``
The [PkgDB migration page](https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/WhatHappenedToPkgdb#How… still points here, so...
I recently had the [python-fiona package approved](https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1468877#c2), but the New Repo request was [denied due to an existing PDC branch](https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/95#comment-458618). Contrarily, the branch request was [denied because the repo _didn't_ exist](https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/101#comment-458629).
Instead, there exists a [retired python-Fiona repo](https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-Fiona). So it seems that the PDC check is case-insensitive but the repo branch check is case-sensitive. These are the same package (except Python packages seem to be shifting to lower-case names everywhere), so I would like to either adopt the existing one with a rename or get some sort of manual intervention to add the lower case name. (Please also enable the f26 and f27 branches if that can be done at the same time.)
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/6976
andresmihkelson reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following:
``
I would like to adopt the following orphaned packages and continue working on them:
estonianidcard
qdigidoc
esteidcerts
firefox-esteidpkcs11loader
firefox-esteid-plugin
qesteidutil
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/6991
suve reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following:
``
As stated in the title - the package has been in orphan state for a few weeks and I'd like to adopt it. The "Infrastructure/WhatHappenedToPkgdb" wiki page suggests I should open a ticket here, so here it goes.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/6955
kellin opened a new pull-request against the project: `releng` that you are following:
``
Update sigulsign_unsigned.py for Python3
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/releng/pull-request/6996
sharkcz opened a new pull-request against the project: `pungi-fedora` that you are following:
``
add s390x beta config
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/253
dcallagh reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following:
``
Recently I noticed a bunch of TurboGears dependencies disappeared from EPEL7 with no explanation. Koschei [noticed it too](https://apps.fedoraproject.org/koschei/package/TurboGears?collection=e…:
```
Package resolution failed No package found for: python-turbojson >= 1.3
No package found for: python-paste-script
No package found for: python-cherrypy2
No package found for: python-turbokid >= 1.0.5
No package found for: python-peak-rules
No package found for: python-turbocheetah
```
According to `koji list-tag-history` these were untagged on 5 August, for example:
```
Sat Aug 5 15:24:19 2017: python-cherrypy2-2.3.0-18.el7 untagged from epel7 by releng
```
The common theme is that these packages were previously retired in 2014 when TurboGears was abandoned by Toshio, and then later they were *un-retired* after I picked it up. The `dead.package` file was created when they were retired, but then it was left behind in git when they were un-retired (these packages don't really ever get updates as you can see).
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-cherrypy2/c/f0c006f5de16796a9d31f…https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-cherrypy2/tree/epel7
You can see in the Pkgdb read-only view that the package was indeed *not* retired as of last week:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python-cherrypy2/
I guess this was a mistake in the Pkgdb-to-Pagure transition, which wrongly assumed the presence of a `dead.package` file in git meant the package was actually retired.
Other packages affected were python-astroid (#6941) and possible many others?
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/6945
mohanboddu opened a new pull-request against the project: `releng` that you are following:
``
Converting all print statements from py2 to py3
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/releng/pull-request/6988
mohanboddu opened a new pull-request against the project: `pungi-fedora` that you are following:
``
Use just F28 key since everything in rawhide is signed with F28 key now.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/334
mohanboddu opened a new pull-request against the project: `pungi-fedora` that you are following:
``
Fixing critpath for branched(f27)
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/336
rishi reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following:
``
I am trying to retire xchat [1] using "fedpkg retire". It is failing after pushing the changes to Git, and asking me for my FAS password.
[rishi@kolache xchat]$ fedpkg --verbose retire "XChat is dead. The recommended replacement is HexChat."
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/fedora/client/bodhi.py:48: DeprecationWarning: fedora.client.bodhi has been deprecated. Please use bodhi.client.bindings instead.
DeprecationWarning)
Creating repo object from /home/rishi/devel/xchat/fedora/xchat
dead.package found, package probably already retired - will not remove files from git or overwrite existing dead.package file
Running: git push
Everything up-to-date
FAS password for user rishi:
Could not execute retire: Un-expected openid provider asked: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/fedpkg", line 16, in <module>
main()
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/fedpkg/__main__.py", line 77, in main
sys.exit(client.args.command())
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/fedpkg/cli.py", line 81, in retire
pkgdb.retire_packages(module_name, branch, namespace=namespace)
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pkgdb2client/__init__.py", line 756, in retire_packages
return self.handle_api_call('/package/retire/', data=args)
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pkgdb2client/__init__.py", line 220, in handle_api_call
output = self.call_api(path, params, data)
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pkgdb2client/__init__.py", line 191, in call_api
self.login(username=username, password=password)
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pkgdb2client/__init__.py", line 146, in login
super(PkgDB, self).login(username, password, otp=None)
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/fedora/client/openidbaseclient.py", line 293, in login
openid_insecure=self.openid_insecure)
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/fedora/client/openidproxyclient.py", line 118, in openid_login
'Un-expected openid provider asked: %s' % response.url)
fedora.client.FedoraServiceError: Un-expected openid provider asked: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/
[1] https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1721
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7002