rel-eng August 2010

rel-eng@lists.fedoraproject.org

4 participants
217 discussions

Re: #3860: Create Alpha Release Candidate (RC): INstall CD/DVD
by Fedora Release Engineering 09 Aug '10

09 Aug '10

#3860: Create Alpha Release Candidate (RC): INstall CD/DVD ------------------------------+--------------------------------------------- Reporter: jkeating | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Type: task | Status: reopened Milestone: Fedora 14 Alpha | Component: other Resolution: | Keywords: release-task ------------------------------+--------------------------------------------- Comment (by poelstra): In order to finish the Alpha we need to complete the following: 1. These updates for Alpha-critical bugs that need to be pushed to make the repos sync with RC2 (and make sure we don't forget anything for RC3): * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/man-pages-de-0.5-4.fc14 * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/selinux-policy-3.8.8-10.fc14 * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/systemd-6-2.fc14 (nb: also needs http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=188125) * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/eclipse-pydev-1.5.9-2.fc14 * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/anaconda-14.15-1.fc14 (needs proventester feedback though) * http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-bugzilla-0.6.1-3.fc14 * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/initscripts-9.16-2.fc14 * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/udev-160-9.fc14 2. We are waiting on a fix https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=622058 and then we would like RC3 to be created as soon as possible. We are working against having all of our testing completed by the time of the "Go/No-Go" meeting on 2010-08-11. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/3860#comment:17> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

1 0

#3946: Please update F13 buildroot with latest lvm2 packages so new udisks can be built
by Fedora Release Engineering 09 Aug '10

09 Aug '10

#3946: Please update F13 buildroot with latest lvm2 packages so new udisks can be built ----------------------+----------------------------------------------------- Reporter: dwysocha | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Type: task | Status: new Milestone: | Component: koji Keywords: | ----------------------+----------------------------------------------------- Udisks has a dependency on an lvm2 library. lvm2 was recently updated as a result of this security update: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614248 The update failed in fedora-updates-testing and is noted in this bz: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=622385 As noted in the last update of the bz, davidz has added the proper patch to udisks but the udisks build fails because the new lvm2 build is not in the buildroot: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=622385#c4 Thanks. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/3946> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

1 2

#3877: Block mfsutils from rawhide (and any future branching)
by Fedora Release Engineering 09 Aug '10

09 Aug '10

#3877: Block mfsutils from rawhide (and any future branching) ------------------+--------------------------------------------------------- Reporter: spot | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Type: task | Status: new Milestone: | Component: koji Keywords: | ------------------+--------------------------------------------------------- mfsutils has no upstream that I can find, the code doesn't build cleanly on 64bit arches and it doesn't work properly on 32bit arches. Please block this in rawhide (and from any future branching), as I have retired it. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/3877> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

1 1

#3885: block wkf and mfiler2 from rawhide tree
by Fedora Release Engineering 09 Aug '10

09 Aug '10

#3885: block wkf and mfiler2 from rawhide tree ---------------------+------------------------------------------------------ Reporter: mtasaka | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Type: task | Status: new Milestone: | Component: koji Keywords: | ---------------------+------------------------------------------------------ Hello.[[BR]] [[BR]] After discussion with mfiler2/mfiler3 upstream, he said that mfiler2 was no longer maintained so I decided to remove mfiler2 from rawhide tree.[[BR]] Also, wkf is used only by mfiler2, so wkf is no longer needed and I am not going to maintain any longer.[[BR]] [[BR]] Please remove mfiler2 and wkf from rawhide tree. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/3885> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

1 1

#3799: man-pages-de is unmainted upstream for years
by Fedora Release Engineering 09 Aug '10

09 Aug '10

#3799: man-pages-de is unmainted upstream for years -------------------+-------------------------------------------------------- Reporter: romal | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Type: task | Status: new Milestone: | Component: koji Keywords: | -------------------+-------------------------------------------------------- Hi, how do I remove the package completly from Fedora ? The upstream is dead for years and I think a recent english manpage is better than a massive outdated localised manpage. Regards, Robert -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/3799> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

1 3

#3837: Read-only SSH access on releng builder
by Fedora Release Engineering 09 Aug '10

09 Aug '10

#3837: Read-only SSH access on releng builder ---------------------+------------------------------------------------------ Reporter: jdieter | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Type: task | Status: new Milestone: | Component: other Keywords: | ---------------------+------------------------------------------------------ I'm trying to track down https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598584, and have gone as far as I can using my local buildsystem. Is there any way I can get read- only/guest SSH access on whichever builders run mash? -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/3837> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

1 4

#3836: Bruno would like to dicuss spins and GA release at next releng meeting
by Fedora Release Engineering 09 Aug '10

09 Aug '10

#3836: Bruno would like to dicuss spins and GA release at next releng meeting -------------------+-------------------------------------------------------- Reporter: bruno | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Type: task | Status: new Milestone: | Component: koji Keywords: | -------------------+-------------------------------------------------------- Spins would like to see a positive affirmation from all spin owners as part of the GA release process. I'd like to discuss how that might work. Issues: Should spin owners work directly with release manager or go through the spins wrangler? When and where will spin owners be able to get iso's for testing? When do they have to acknowledge by? If there is a problem with a spin or an owner is late to reply, what options are practical? Can we only drop the spin? Can we release it after GA? Is there time for any respins if the GA release is not pushed back? What minimal amounts of testing do we want to require for F14? -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/3836> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

1 4

#3943: http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb pages cached forever
by Fedora Release Engineering 09 Aug '10

09 Aug '10

#3943: http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb pages cached forever --------------------+------------------------------------------------------- Reporter: ellert | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Type: task | Status: new Milestone: | Component: cvs Keywords: | --------------------+------------------------------------------------------- Once I have watch a page at http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb it never gets updated, even if new commits have been done since I last watched it. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/3943> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

1 1

#3908: draft of updated Perl packaging guideline
by Fedora Release Engineering 09 Aug '10

09 Aug '10

#3908: draft of updated Perl packaging guideline ----------------------+----------------------------------------------------- Reporter: mmaslano | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Type: task | Status: new Milestone: | Component: other Keywords: | ----------------------+----------------------------------------------------- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDraft:Perl Already discussed on perl-devel in this thread: http://www.mail-archive.com/perl- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org/msg04146.html -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/3908> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

1 1

#3239: deltarpm missing for eclipse update (F12) - 3.5.1-20 => -21
by Fedora Release Engineering 09 Aug '10

09 Aug '10

#3239: deltarpm missing for eclipse update (F12) - 3.5.1-20 => -21 --------------------+------------------------------------------------------- Reporter: bbaetz | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Type: defect | Status: new Milestone: | Component: other Keywords: | --------------------+------------------------------------------------------- An update to eclipse was pushed today, however the eclipse packages don't have the appropriate drpms available. A drpm is available from the 'base' eclipse-jdt-3.5.1-4.fc12, but not from the last update to -20 (https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2009-11860) For example, I had eclipse-jdt-3.5.1-20.fc12.x86_64.rpm installed. /fedora/linux/updates/12/x86_64/drpms/ on my local mirror has eclipse- jdt-3.5.1-4.fc12_3.5.1-21.fc12.x86_64.drpm but no other relevant file. I can generate a drpm locally using makedeltarpm, and apply it to the koji (unsigned) -20 package to get an identical package. This means that I have to download a 24M package rather than a 94k drpm. (Similarly for the 27M eclipse-platform package) Some packages (eg NetworkManager) do have a drpm from both the initial version and the previous updated version. I've seen this happen before (missing drpm) with other packages (internet caps in .au means I notice large package updates), but haven't previously looked into why. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/3239> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

1 2

← Newer
1
...
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
...
22
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

rel-eng August 2010