#2025: Too hard to build dependent packages in stable
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
Reporter: hadess | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Milestone: | Component: koji
Keywords: |
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
It's too complicated, human-dependent, and time-consuming to build
interdependent package updates in stable releases.
Two cases:
* gstreamer and gstreamer-plugins-base are released at the same time, and
so are pre-releases of those. They soft-depend on each other (gstreamer
can be updated on its own). It's currently not possible for me to offer
both pre-releases of gstreamer and gsteamer-plugins-base without either:
1. asking for a package to be tagged into the build roots
2. pushing gstreamer into stable (takes a few days at best), and push the
gstreamer-plugins-base package separately
* gnome-bluetooth and gnome-phone-manager, where I need to ask for gnome-
bluetooth to be pushed into the buildroot tree. Sometimes that just
doesn't work (as could have been seen in
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-7140 /
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/1945 and
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=112091 )
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/2025>
Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng>
Release Engineering for the Fedora Project
#4987: Not able to mark fedora-review as '+' in bugzilla
--------------------+-------------------------------------------------------
Reporter: mmorsi | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Type: task | Status: new
Milestone: | Component: other
Keywords: |
--------------------+-------------------------------------------------------
I have approved two packages for Fedora in bugzilla, rubygem-idn and
rubygem-addressable but am not able to select '+' as an option for the
fedora-review field. This has worked for me in the past and I was
wondering if anything was changed / broken and if anything had to be done
to resolve this.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728088https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588428
Thank you greatly.
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/4987>
Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng>
Release Engineering for the Fedora Project
#5008: problem setting cvs flag - new package request
------------------+------------------------
Reporter: jcm | Owner: rel-eng@…
Type: task | Status: new
Milestone: | Component: git
Keywords: | Blocked By:
Blocking: |
------------------+------------------------
NOTE: Trying to get this out in time for the holidays so folks can test :)
Hello everyone!
I have a new package request that has been reviewed, and I've added the
SCM boilerplate text:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=769832
I can't set the flag for you to review for some reason. Could you look
into fixing this for me? This package will replace module-init-tools in
a future Fedora release, and I am packaging it and preparing it now. It
is parallel installable at this time, and won't deprecate anything yet
without some co-ordination between everyone who is involved :)
Appreciate any help. I hope to get some initial rawhide packages built
over the holidays if you can resolve getting branches setup.
Jon.
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5008>
Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng>
Release Engineering for the Fedora Project
#5045: Remove junk branches
--------------------+------------------------
Reporter: ellert | Owner: rel-eng@…
Type: task | Status: new
Milestone: | Component: git
Keywords: | Blocked By:
Blocking: |
--------------------+------------------------
Hi.
I seem to have managed to create new remote branches for two of my
packages. I don't know how it happened - I probably misspelled something
and didn't notice at the time.
I have tried to figure out how to remove them, but have not been
successful.
Could I ask for someone to remove them, or tell me the right commands so
that I can do it myself?
The branches are called "15" and "16" (without the f) in the packages
globus-io and globus-gridftp-server-control.
Mattias
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5045>
Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng>
Release Engineering for the Fedora Project
#5350: Is it possible to delete a build that's been pushed to stable ?
----------------------+------------------------
Reporter: jpopelka | Owner: rel-eng@…
Type: task | Status: new
Milestone: | Component: koji
Keywords: | Blocked By:
Blocking: |
----------------------+------------------------
Hi,
dhcp-4.2.4-1.P2.fc16 has been mistakenly pushed to stable without any
karma.
Now we know the dhclient is not working at all !
Fix is on the way
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dhcp-4.2.4-3.P2.fc16
but I wonder if I (you) could somehow unpush the dhcp-4.2.4-1.P2.fc16
before the fix reaches stable.
'koji untag-pkg f16-updates dhcp-4.2.4-1.P2.fc16' requires admin
permission.
Thank you
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5350>
Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng>
Release Engineering for the Fedora Project