March 2012 - rel-eng - Fedora Mailing-Lists

by Fedora Release Engineering

#4992: Retire mediawiki114 --------------------+------------------------------------------------------- Reporter: smooge | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Type: task | Status: new Milestone: | Component: koji Keywords: | --------------------+------------------------------------------------------- Package is End of Life and no longer supportable. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/4992> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

12 years

1
2
0 / 0

#5019: Help needed recovering from a messed up nss-softokn-3.13.1-15.fc15 update in bodhi

by Fedora Release Engineering

#5019: Help needed recovering from a messed up nss-softokn-3.13.1-15.fc15 update in bodhi ------------------------+------------------------ Reporter: emaldonado | Owner: rel-eng@… Type: task | Status: new Milestone: | Component: koji Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | ------------------------+------------------------ Clicking on https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nss- softokn-3.13.1-15.fc15 will report an internal server error. I get failures using the bodhi command line tools aslo and I think know the cause. While editing this update I accidentally removed all builds from the list. Not realizing that, I saved the edit which messed up things up in Bodhi. Please help me recover from this. If the last resort solution is deleting it, I'm okay with this. Thanks in advance. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5019> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

12 years

1
1
0 / 0

#5010: Tag nspr-4.8.9-2.fc15 into buildroot override for f15

by Fedora Release Engineering

#5010: Tag nspr-4.8.9-2.fc15 into buildroot override for f15 ------------------------+------------------------ Reporter: emaldonado | Owner: rel-eng@… Type: task | Status: new Milestone: | Component: koji Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | ------------------------+------------------------ Needed to build nss-softokn Attempts to to do it via bodhi fails with bodhi --buildroot-override=nss-softokn-nspr-4.8.9-2.fc15 --notes="Needed to build nss-softokn" -u emaldonado Failed: Error: buildroot override for u'nspr-4.8.9-2.fc15' already exists To my surprise, attempt to manually expire it failed also bodhi -u emaldonado --expire-override=nspr-4.8.9-2.fc15 Override nspr-4.8.9-2.fc15 already expired! -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5010> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

12 years

1
2
0 / 0

#5006: nss-util broken F16

by Fedora Release Engineering

#5006: nss-util broken F16 --------------------------+--------------------------------------------- Reporter: shakthimaan | Owner: rel-eng@… Type: task | Status: new Milestone: | Component: koji Keywords: | Blocking: Blocked By: | --------------------------+--------------------------------------------- One of my packages (flterm) doesn't build on F16 due to broken nss-utils. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=3600394&name=mock_outpu... It builds fine on F15 and F17. Can you please resolve the nss-utils package? Thanks. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5006> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

12 years

1
1
0 / 0

#5004: Tag request

by Fedora Release Engineering

#5004: Tag request ---------------------+--------------------------------------------- Reporter: xhorak | Owner: rel-eng@… Type: task | Status: new Milestone: | Component: koji Keywords: | Blocking: Blocked By: | ---------------------+--------------------------------------------- We need to tag: nss-3.13.1-9.fc16 as override due to firefox and thunderbird rebuild. Other nss packages are already overridden. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5004> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

12 years

1
2
0 / 0

#4966: Please could you add geany-0.21-1.el6 to the buildroot for EL6

by Fedora Release Engineering

#4966: Please could you add geany-0.21-1.el6 to the buildroot for EL6 ------------------+--------------------------------------------------------- Reporter: jgu | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Type: task | Status: new Milestone: | Component: koji Keywords: | ------------------+--------------------------------------------------------- Hi, I've tried adding a buildroot override via bodhi, but it doesn't seem to work for EPEL? Anyway, please could you add geany-0.21-1.el6 to the buildroot so I can build geany-plugins. Thansk -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/4966> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

12 years

1
2
0 / 0

#4955: update releases/15 repomd.xml timestamps to be newer than published development/15 timestamps

by Fedora Release Engineering

#4955: update releases/15 repomd.xml timestamps to be newer than published development/15 timestamps ---------------------+------------------------------------------------------ Reporter: mdomsch | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Type: task | Status: new Milestone: | Component: other Keywords: | ---------------------+------------------------------------------------------ https://fedorahosted.org/mirrormanager/ticket/35 <mdomsch> dgilmore: development/15 got a newer tree (with newer repomd.xml timestamps) after releases/15 was published <dgilmore> mdomsch: yeah i didsabled branched a day late <mdomsch> which is a problem for anyone who updated in that window <dgilmore> disabled <mdomsch> now yum sees the development/15 timestamp, and the "older" releases/15 timestamp, and throws out the releases/15 repomd.xml, keeping the now-incorrect one. <mdomsch> yum clean is needed to fix it <dgilmore> mdomsch: considering the development/15 was removed ages ago im not sure anyone should still see that <mdomsch> skvidal: unfortunately yes <skvidal> mdomsch: yum clean expire-cache should d oit <mdomsch> skvidal: yum clean --enablerepo=\* or somesuch to pick up debuginfo repos too... <mdomsch> dgilmore: it's not that they still see it, it's that they saw it once, with a newer timestamp than what they see now <mdomsch> so a manual expire-cache is needed <mdomsch> so between skvidal and dgilmore, how can we avoid that for f16+ ? <skvidal> how much newer is the timestamp? <dgilmore> mdomsch: we really cant, <skvidal> can we just touch the file(s) and move along? <mdomsch> skvidal: hours <mdomsch> it's not the file system timestamp, it's the repomd.xml timestamp <skvidal> okay can we modify the file manually <dgilmore> mdomsch: well when we say go, i need to make sure i disabled the branched repo then rsync the contents into place i guess <mdomsch> <revision>1305638986</revision> <mdomsch> is correct <skvidal> right - I'm saying <mdomsch> <revision>1305725445</revision> <skvidal> 1. touch the files for a future date <skvidal> 2. modify the repomd.xml to reflect that molestation <mdomsch> skvidal: I like it <skvidal> the mirrors should pick up the change in the repomd.xml and mirror it out <skvidal> the contents are all the same in the repodata - it just LOOKS newer <skvidal> this is not something I'd recommend doing often <skvidal> but as a one-time deal <skvidal> it seems easy enough <mdomsch> skvidal: I presume that's a rel-eng task, and I should assign there? <skvidal> mdomsch: I think so.... -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/4955> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

12 years

1
4
0 / 0

#4894: build override itstool-1.1.0-2.fc16

by Fedora Release Engineering

#4894: build override itstool-1.1.0-2.fc16 ----------------------+----------------------------------------------------- Reporter: sundaram | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Type: task | Status: new Milestone: | Component: koji Keywords: | ----------------------+----------------------------------------------------- needed for deja-dup. can't do it via bodhi because I am not the maintainer of itstool and bodhi won't let me -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/4894> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

12 years

1
2
0 / 0

#4889: EPEL6: build root override - perl-Devel-StackTrace-AsHTML

by Fedora Release Engineering

#4889: EPEL6: build root override - perl-Devel-StackTrace-AsHTML ------------------+--------------------------------------------------------- Reporter: jpo | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Type: task | Status: new Milestone: | Component: koji Keywords: | ------------------+--------------------------------------------------------- Hi, I would like to request an EPEL6 build root override for "perl-Devel- StackTrace-AsHTML" as I need it to build perl-Plack. perl-Devel- StackTrace-AsHTML-0.11-2.el6.1 has just been pushed for EPEL6 updates- testing. Warning: I don't have commit rights in rawhide; I only own the EPEL6 branch. tia, [[BR]] jpo PS - These are other packages in the long perl-Dancer requirements list (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729504) -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/4889> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

12 years

1
2
0 / 0

#4791: install of buildroot failed but install started

by Fedora Release Engineering

#4791: install of buildroot failed but install started ----------------------+----------------------------------------------------- Reporter: mmaslano | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Type: task | Status: new Milestone: | Component: koji Keywords: | ----------------------+----------------------------------------------------- The installation of buildroot failed, see: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=3149029&name=root.log But build phase started, see: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=3149029&name=build.log I'd like to point out that this bug is serious. Imagine, that you have package in C, which is checking by configure installed packages. In buildroot they are missing, but install could be successful because configure detect available packages and use available. Therefore you can have in specfile --with-selinux, but build could be done without SElinux support. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/4791> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

12 years

1
5
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

rel-eng March 2012