[releng] Updated tag rawhide-stable
by Dennis Gilmore
The lightweight tag 'rawhide-stable' was updated to point to:
be7d01d... not send kfsflatten output to /dev/null wrap the urls for a
It previously pointed to:
30e39eb... Merge buildbranched and buildrawhide
NOTE: People pulling from the repository will not get the new tag.
For more information, please see:
http://live.gnome.org/Git/Help/TagUpdates
9 years, 7 months
#6034: URGENT: Need Atomic compose run
by Fedora Release Engineering
#6034: URGENT: Need Atomic compose run
----------------------------+------------------------
Reporter: jzb | Owner: rel-eng@…
Type: task | Status: new
Milestone: Fedora 21 Beta | Component: koji
Keywords: | Blocked By:
Blocking: |
----------------------------+------------------------
There was no beta Atomic image, and we urgently need an image to run a
test days and prepare for final.
We need to update the JSON [1] with the final branch (where update trees
will live) and ensure we're using the right JSON files for the final
compose (e.g. including cockpit & kubernetes) as those have been missing
from test composes.
Colin is CC'ed on this ticket, and may have additional information to add.
[1] https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/fedora-atomic.git/tree/fedora-
atomic-docker-host.json?h=f21#n4
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6034>
Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng>
Release Engineering for the Fedora Project
9 years, 7 months
[PATCH] build-cloud-images: Use --version of ksflatten, and do show stderr
by Colin Walters
Untested, but I think this will fix the Atomic compose.
CC'ing fedora-cloud as my patch also touches the invocations
for mainline cloud as well as the docker base image.
We need to specify --version to ensure the build host is
allowed to use kickstart syntax from the target version.
Remove the >& /dev/null as we'd like to be able to debug if it's
failing.
---
scripts/build-cloud-images | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
9 years, 7 months
#6043: Need some openshift packages blocked in F21 and F22
by Fedora Release Engineering
#6043: Need some openshift packages blocked in F21 and F22
-----------------------------+------------------------
Reporter: tdawson | Owner: rel-eng@…
Type: task | Status: new
Milestone: Fedora 21 Final | Component: koji
Keywords: | Blocked By:
Blocking: |
-----------------------------+------------------------
Hello,
Almost all of the openshift packages need to be blocked from F21 and F22.
Right now some are blocked and some are not, causing dependency issues.
Need to be blocked in F22
{{{
openshift-origin-msg-node-mcollective
openshift-origin-port-proxy
rubygem-openshift-origin-controller
}}}
Need to be blocked in F21
{{{
openshift-origin-broker
openshift-origin-broker-util
openshift-origin-cartridge-cron
openshift-origin-cartridge-diy
openshift-origin-cartridge-mongodb
openshift-origin-cartridge-mysql
openshift-origin-msg-common
openshift-origin-msg-node-mcollective
openshift-origin-node-proxy
openshift-origin-node-util
openshift-origin-port-proxy
openshift-origin-util
pam_openshift
rubygem-openshift-origin-auth-remote-user
rubygem-openshift-origin-controller
rubygem-openshift-origin-dns-nsupdate
}}}
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6043>
Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng>
Release Engineering for the Fedora Project
9 years, 7 months
[releng] autosigner: Add missing check for None
by Till Maas
commit 15384d725b1508c18301adac3be722c4a68a7fe2
Author: Till Maas <opensource(a)till.name>
Date: Mon Nov 10 20:40:38 2014 +0100
autosigner: Add missing check for None
scripts/autosigner.py | 4 +++-
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/scripts/autosigner.py b/scripts/autosigner.py
index 4b07008..5ca2a42 100755
--- a/scripts/autosigner.py
+++ b/scripts/autosigner.py
@@ -272,7 +272,9 @@ class AutoSigner(object):
self.signers[signer_id] = signer
signing_task = signer.sign(signing_task=signing_task)
- if signing_task.unsigned:
+ if signing_task is not None:
+ return False
+ elif signing_task.unsigned:
signing_task.error_count += 1
signing_task.last_attempt = time.time()
self.incomplete.append(signing_task)
9 years, 7 months
[releng] Send check_sigul mails to releng cron list
by Till Maas
commit 0112657d45a38e4a34e233d8a3969b134d0a1831
Author: Till Maas <opensource(a)till.name>
Date: Mon Nov 10 20:04:00 2014 +0100
Send check_sigul mails to releng cron list
scripts/check_sigul.py | 4 +++-
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/scripts/check_sigul.py b/scripts/check_sigul.py
index 47568dd..58efbe8 100755
--- a/scripts/check_sigul.py
+++ b/scripts/check_sigul.py
@@ -27,8 +27,10 @@ if __name__ == "__main__":
# FIXME: Make this a config option
fedora_user = getpass.getuser()
+ mail_from = "nobody(a)fedoraproject.org"
+ mail_to = [fedora_user, "releng-cron(a)lists.fedoraproject.org"]
mail_logger = SubjectSMTPHandler(
- "127.0.0.1", fedora_user, [fedora_user], "Sigul check log event")
+ "127.0.0.1", mail_from, mail_to, "Sigul check log event")
mail_logger.subject_prefix = "Sigul check: "
mail_logger.setLevel(logging.WARNING)
mail_logger.setFormatter(formatter)
9 years, 7 months
[releng] autosigner: Send mails to releng-cron list
by Till Maas
commit 52a54239a9bec9bfb466b176cc94dfaf95a6d686
Author: Till Maas <opensource(a)till.name>
Date: Mon Nov 10 20:01:55 2014 +0100
autosigner: Send mails to releng-cron list
scripts/autosigner.py | 4 +++-
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/scripts/autosigner.py b/scripts/autosigner.py
index bc2a371..4b07008 100755
--- a/scripts/autosigner.py
+++ b/scripts/autosigner.py
@@ -373,8 +373,10 @@ def setup_logging():
# FIXME: Make this a config option
fedora_user = getpass.getuser()
+ mail_from = "nobody(a)fedoraproject.org"
+ mail_to = [fedora_user, "releng-cron(a)lists.fedoraproject.org"]
mail_logger = SubjectSMTPHandler(
- "127.0.0.1", fedora_user, [fedora_user], "Autosigner log event")
+ "127.0.0.1", mail_from, mail_to, "Autosigner log event")
mail_logger.subject_prefix = "Autosigner: "
mail_logger.setLevel(logging.ERROR)
mail_logger.setFormatter(formatter)
9 years, 7 months
Summary/Minutes from today's Release Engineering Meeting (2014-11-10)
by Kevin Fenzi
======================================
#fedora-meeting-1: RELENG (2014-11-10)
======================================
Meeting started by nirik at 14:30:01 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2014-11-10/releng.2014-...
.
Meeting summary
---------------
* init process (nirik, 14:30:02)
* Secondary Architectures update - s390 (nirik, 14:35:15)
* Tickets (nirik, 14:38:26)
* Secondary Architectures update - ppc (nirik, 14:38:47)
* Tickets (nirik, 14:42:14)
* LINK:
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/report/10?sort=created&asc=1&page=1
(nirik, 14:42:23)
* LINK: http://infrastructure.fedoraproject.org/infra/db-dumps/ (btw)
(nirik, 14:56:40)
* Open Floor (nirik, 15:03:26)
* LINK: http://paste.fedoraproject.org/149368/56331421 (tyll,
15:25:49)
Meeting ended at 15:34:14 UTC.
Action Items
------------
Action Items, by person
-----------------------
* **UNASSIGNED**
* (none)
People Present (lines said)
---------------------------
* nirik (85)
* tyll (36)
* sharkcz (16)
* bochecha (6)
* zodbot (4)
* pbabinca (2)
* masta (1)
* pbrobinson (0)
* dgilmore (0)
--
14:30:01 <nirik> #startmeeting RELENG (2014-11-10)
14:30:02 <zodbot> Meeting started Mon Nov 10 14:30:01 2014 UTC. The chair is nirik. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
14:30:02 <zodbot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic.
14:30:02 <nirik> #meetingname releng
14:30:02 <zodbot> The meeting name has been set to 'releng'
14:30:02 <nirik> #chair dgilmore nirik tyll sharkcz bochecha masta pbrobinson
14:30:02 <nirik> #topic init process
14:30:02 <zodbot> Current chairs: bochecha dgilmore masta nirik pbrobinson sharkcz tyll
14:30:10 <nirik> who all is around for a releng meeting?
14:30:15 <bochecha> I am
14:30:42 * pbabinca here
14:32:44 * sharkcz is here
14:33:06 * nirik will wait another minute or two for folks to wander in
14:35:13 <nirik> ok, I guess lets go ahead...
14:35:15 <nirik> #topic Secondary Architectures update - s390
14:35:23 <nirik> sharkcz: any news to report?
14:36:24 <sharkcz> not much, I created a compose a week ago, roughly like beta in primary, works fine, but there is a problem with writing to console in 3.17 kernel, bug is reported and IBM is looking on it
14:36:52 <nirik> ah, ok.
14:37:01 <nirik> so no official beta until thats squashed?
14:37:07 <sharkcz> bug #1158848 for the record, network login works
14:37:20 <sharkcz> yes
14:38:00 <nirik> ok, makes sense.
14:38:19 <nirik> no pbrobinson or masta, I guess we skip ppc and arm for now.
14:38:26 <nirik> #topic Tickets
14:38:36 <sharkcz> I can comment ppc a bit
14:38:41 <nirik> ok, coo.
14:38:47 <nirik> #topic Secondary Architectures update - ppc
14:39:32 <sharkcz> there is beta rc1, but is blocked by 2 issues - cryptsetup fails on arches with page size >=64k (ppc* and aarch64), fix exists upstream so I need to ask jwb to include it
14:40:18 <nirik> ok.
14:40:47 <sharkcz> another issue is multipath install, seems to work on x86 in minimal setup (kvm + 1 multipathed scsi disk), we are reproducing this setup on ppc and will see later today hopefully
14:41:35 <nirik> alright, sounds good.
14:41:42 <nirik> so hopefully soon for a beta
14:41:53 <sharkcz> yep
14:42:07 <nirik> excellent. thanks.
14:42:14 <nirik> #topic Tickets
14:42:23 <nirik> https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/report/10?sort=created&asc=1&page=1
14:42:30 <nirik> we have 14 tickets open with meeting...
14:42:39 <nirik> not sure which we can/should go over today
14:42:51 <nirik> (with many folks not here)
14:43:48 <nirik> sharkcz: did https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6014 get a final list? or do we even have a way to find out?
14:45:01 <sharkcz> I don't have the list at hand, but should be doable by a direct query to koji db
14:45:25 <sharkcz> question is whether it is worth the effort
14:45:39 <nirik> yeah, no idea on that part. perhaps it's just history now.
14:46:11 <sharkcz> yes, I'd close the ticket, very likely there are new builds for the affected packages
14:46:24 <nirik> ok.
14:46:46 <nirik> also https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6024 can probibly be closed, we discussed it last week and I think pingou already implemented what we talked about.
14:48:55 <nirik> ok, those closed. ;) then there were 12. ;)
14:50:06 <bochecha> 6039 seems like something we could solve quickly?
14:50:42 <nirik> bochecha: off hand I would say we could publish dumps, but I am not fully sure there's no sensitive info in there.
14:50:49 <nirik> I would want to check with dgilmore on that...
14:51:47 <nirik> we have a framework already in place for sharing db's... but not sure koji would be ok to share that way.
14:52:09 <sharkcz> but won't be the dumps too large? I have 7GB+ on s390, the dump, compressed
14:52:39 <sharkcz> and primary has much more info in it I guess
14:53:12 <nirik> huh... primary ones are only 1.3gbish
14:53:14 <bochecha> looking at the db for another koji, I can't think of anything that could be sensitive
14:53:25 <nirik> -rw-r--r--. 1 postgres postgres 1.3G Nov 10 04:55 koji-2014-11-10.dump.xz
14:53:48 <sharkcz> let me check it, I hope I read the scale correctly :-)
14:54:18 <sharkcz> ah, it's 700M ;-)
14:54:24 <nirik> cool.
14:55:13 <nirik> bochecha: I don't know if we setup initial admins when installing with passwords instead of certs? otherwise, yeah, not sure what could be sensitive.
14:55:30 <bochecha> nirik, ah, that maybe
14:56:11 <nirik> anyhow I can check with dgilmore and see what he thinks... it would be pretty trivial to add it to the db's we already make available.
14:56:40 <nirik> http://infrastructure.fedoraproject.org/infra/db-dumps/ (btw)
14:57:34 <nirik> any other tickets we think we can make progress on? or should we call it a short meeting?
14:58:13 <bochecha> about 6016, didn't we say we'd like some data about savings?
14:58:40 <sharkcz> #6023 - should we express our opinions the ticket?
14:59:19 <nirik> bochecha: yeah, you want to add a comment about that there?
14:59:39 <bochecha> pbabinca, did you have any time to look at savings from using fedpkg-minimal? :)
14:59:59 <pbabinca> bochecha, I haven't made any progress there.
15:00:00 <nirik> sharkcz: sure I guess. Again, I would want to check with dgilmore before adding any folks there... it's pretty sensitive...
15:00:12 <nirik> but we should/could add some more folks, especially in .eu
15:03:26 <nirik> #topic Open Floor
15:03:31 <nirik> anyone have items for open floor?
15:04:18 <tyll> can we decide something about https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6040 - e.g. can an existing systems be used for it?
15:05:09 <nirik> tyll: possibly releng04... but it's rhel6... does that present problems?
15:05:51 <tyll> nirik: uh, if I can login there, I can check - I only ran it on Fedora and RHEL7
15:06:23 <nirik> tyll: I can get you access to it if you don't have it already.
15:06:45 <nirik> thats the machine fedora updates pushes happen on, so it sends already bodhi emails and such.
15:06:52 <tyll> yes, I can access it
15:06:58 <nirik> or we could just make a new releng-backend or something.
15:07:26 <tyll> Can I add an ansible task for the cronjob for it or does it need to go into puppet?
15:08:33 <nirik> sadly, it's in puppet.
15:09:06 <nirik> let me think on it a bit more perhaps...
15:09:07 <tyll> the script does not work out-of-the box on it :-(
15:09:23 * nirik only saw the request this morning before coffee... and have had no time to ponder on it.
15:09:30 <tyll> ok
15:10:02 <nirik> ok, we can make a releng-backend01 perhaps. that makes more sense off hand anyhow.
15:12:09 <nirik> tyll: oh, where are we on rawhide autosigner?
15:13:51 <tyll> I just started looking into it again, it seems that secondary sigul is more stable than a few months ago (or it is because I am monitoring it now)
15:14:44 <nirik> I saw your report of an outage on it... no idea on that. I was asleep... nothing should have been changing on it.
15:14:59 <tyll> It seems to work quite good (still without rawhide gating), except that arm koji shows some issues sometimes
15:15:15 <tyll> ah, there is also something I need to investigate
15:15:37 <tyll> sometimes builds are not properly tagged on secondary kojis, even though a tagging fedmsg was sent earlier
15:15:42 <tyll> not sure if the packages are untagged again
15:16:15 <tyll> or if there is a race condition that makes koji send the fedmsg message before tagging was finished so a query for it fails
15:16:26 <nirik> ah...dunno.
15:16:47 <nirik> one side effect of the rawhide signing is we get the weird metadata problems with pungi making boot.img
15:17:01 <nirik> I think we should put a 'yum clean metadata' in there to work around it.
15:17:26 <tyll> does it fail if RPM checksums fail?
15:17:30 <tyll> checksums change?
15:17:38 <nirik> yeah...
15:18:04 <tyll> I see, this should not happen anymore when there is some gating in koji
15:18:21 <nirik> Error downloading packages:
15:18:21 <nirik> Delta RPM of 1:openssl-libs-1.0.1j-1.fc22.x86_64: Checksum of the delta-rebuilt RPM failed
15:18:35 <nirik> also, probibly it shouldn't be using deltas. ;)
15:18:42 <tyll> hehe
15:19:02 <nirik> anyhow, will see about adding a clean metadata in there.
15:19:32 <tyll> btw. would the releng cron mailing list be the right target to let autosigner report errors via e-mail?
15:20:21 <nirik> Oh, one other tidbit: I got all the builders re-isntalled/updated. they are all runinning 3.17.2-200.fc20 now (aside the ppc and bkernel ones)
15:20:30 <nirik> tyll: sounds good to me. +1
15:21:18 <nirik> ok, if nothing else will close out in a minute.
15:21:35 <tyll> btw. I also added scripts to releng-git a while ago to check whether packages are not signed when mashing them
15:21:50 <tyll> and one script to monitor sigul by checking whether login works every 10 minutes
15:22:01 <tyll> is the last one something that could be added to nagios?
15:22:05 <nirik> mash can check/reject them no?
15:22:10 <nirik> yes, definitely.
15:22:21 <nirik> if it was, then we could more quickly restart them if they got stuck.
15:22:24 <tyll> it looks into the mash logs, because there are only awrnings currently
15:22:53 <nirik> mash has a config option to treat that as a warn or a fail
15:22:58 <tyll> for the check script it would make sense to create a test key that is not used for anything to make it not that critical to use the credentials for it
15:23:12 <tyll> for Rawhide and secondary Branched it is a warning currently
15:23:39 <tyll> the scripts looks into the logs for the warning (I use it to see if autosigner signs all builds)
15:23:44 <nirik> yeah, for bodhi/updates it's strict fail
15:24:02 <nirik> we could make branched that way now too...
15:24:13 <nirik> yeah, test key sounds good.
15:24:17 <tyll> I believe it is for primary Branched
15:24:28 <tyll> ah, this reminds me of one more thing
15:24:56 <tyll> buildbranched and buildrawhide should be merged, but there is at least one diff where I am not sure whether it is intended that they differ
15:25:11 <nirik> yeah, we have wanted to merge them for a long time. ;)
15:25:28 <nirik> whats the diff?
15:25:30 <tyll> I synced most of them
15:25:49 <tyll> http://paste.fedoraproject.org/149368/56331421
15:26:01 <tyll> there is a call for wait
15:26:03 * masta wonders in late
15:28:24 <nirik> huh, no idea why thats there?
15:28:31 <nirik> oh, unless it needs all arches to finish?
15:28:39 <nirik> no, no idea
15:29:56 <tyll> so can it just be synced to buildrawhide?
15:30:34 <nirik> as far as I can tell.
15:30:45 <nirik> there's actually nothing being backgrounded there is there?
15:31:41 <tyll> pungify is
15:31:59 <tyll> and spam-o-matic
15:32:19 <nirik> ok, wonder why rawhide doesn't wait for those and branched does?
15:32:44 <nirik> I would think both should
15:33:23 <tyll> uh, actually both wait before pungify
15:33:47 <nirik> ok... lets continue this after meeting?
15:33:53 <tyll> but rawhide has an extra wait (So I confused both)
15:33:59 <tyll> ok
15:34:12 <nirik> thanks for coming everyone!
15:34:14 <nirik> #endmeeting
9 years, 7 months
