December 2018 - rel-eng - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[releng] Issue #7848: fedpkg retire on modules doesn't remove them from anywhere

by Igor Gnatenko

ignatenkobrain reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following: `` ## Describe the issue I've ran `fedpkg retire` on `stratis/master`, but module didn't disappear neither from f29 nor from rawhide. It would be nice if it would be removed since it is unsupported ;) ## When do you need this? (YYYY/MM/DD) Ideally before F29 final freeze because then it would be shipped to users. ## When is this no longer needed or useful? (YYYY/MM/DD) I think it will be useful always. ## If we cannot complete your request, what is the impact? Unsupported RPMs will be shipped to users. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7848

4 years, 11 months

3
2
0 / 0

[releng] Issue #7807: please create f29-kde koji side target

by Rex Dieter

rdieter reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following: `` * Name of the side tag? f2-kde * Number of builds that are expected in the side tag? 50-100 * How long do you need the side tag? at least until f29 final freeze * Any extra information? `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7807

4 years, 11 months

4
6
0 / 0

[releng] Issue #7641: Create a Fedora Container release in bodhi stg

by Clement Verna

cverna reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following: `` * Describe the issue In order to test container updates in bodhi stg. We need to have a bodhi release available for f28 containers. This will also requires koji tags to be created. * When do you need this? (YYYY/MM/DD) when possible * When is this no longer needed or useful? (YYYY/MM/DD) * If we cannot complete your request, what is the impact? `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7641

4 years, 12 months

4
13
0 / 0

[releng] Issue #7524: Koji builder changes its time suddenly

by Pavel Valena

pvalena reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following: `` In build log, there occurs: ``` make: Warning: File 'abrt_prelude.rb' has modification time 69 s in the future ``` Then executing part of the test suite (in %check) results in (re)compiling a part of code we did not intend to (or at all), and failure occurs: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/8343/27188343/build.log https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/8339/27188339/build.log https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/8030/27168030/build.log https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/8026/27168026/build.log `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7524

4 years, 12 months

6
17
0 / 0

[releng] Issue #7827: Split modules-for-flatpaks into separate compose/repos

by Colin Walters

walters reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following: `` This should probably block Fedora 29 releases (at least classic systems), otherwise it's going to bite people: ``` # podman run --rm -ti registry.fedoraproject.org/fedora:29 bash [root@2fc48260492d /]# yum module enable eog:master ... Enabling module streams: eog master ... [root@2fc48260492d /]# yum -y install bubblewrap ... Installed: bubblewrap-0.3.0-2.module_2123+73a9ef6f.x86_64 .... [root@2fc48260492d /]# rpm -ql bubblewrap |grep /app /app/bin/bwrap ... ``` This is just totally broken - this RPM should only be used to generate flatpaks *server side*. Anyone who ends up installing flatpak-targeted app RPMs on the client side is highly likely to end up with a broken system. https://github.com/projectatomic/rpm-ostree/issues/1542 `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7827

5 years

8
14
0 / 0

[releng] Issue #7922: Build Fedora 29 Python Classroom Lab

by Miro Hrončok

churchyard reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following: `` * Describe the issue The Fedora 29 Python Classroom Lab was not built (it FTBFS and I failed to notice that). The FTBFS fix was pushed to rawhide and F29, rawhide builds, so should F29. Please rebuild it, so we can "release" it. The list should be: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/PythonClassroomLab#Scope * When do you need this? (YYYY/MM/DD) No real deadline, sooner the better. * When is this no longer needed or useful? (YYYY/MM/DD) Fedora 29 EOL. * If we cannot complete your request, what is the impact? No Fedora 29 Python Classroom Lab :( `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7922

5 years

5
21
0 / 0

[releng] PR #7646: FTBFS fixes

by Mohan Boddu

mohanboddu opened a new pull-request against the project: `releng` that you are following: `` FTBFS fixes `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/pull-request/7646

5 years

3
6
0 / 0

[releng] PR #7652: Fixing need rebuild

by Mohan Boddu

mohanboddu opened a new pull-request against the project: `releng` that you are following: `` Fixing need rebuild `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/pull-request/7652

5 years

3
4
0 / 0

[releng] PR #7366: add script for pruning atomic ostree repos

by Dusty Mabe

dustymabe opened a new pull-request against the project: `releng` that you are following: `` add script for pruning atomic ostree repos `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/pull-request/7366

5 years

7
46
0 / 0

[releng] PR #7929: Add script to populate fpdc releases

by Clement Verna

cverna opened a new pull-request against the project: `releng` that you are following: `` Add script to populate fpdc releases `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/pull-request/7929

5 years

2
1
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

rel-eng December 2018