June 2018 - rel-eng - Fedora Mailing-Lists

by Jens Petersen

petersen reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following: `` Hi RelEng, can you please unretire `ghc-fgl`, which I would like to restore to Fedora for F28+. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1585448 (https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/6879) Please unblock `ghc-fgl` for the master and f28 branches. Thanks! `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7549

4 years, 10 months

4
8
0 / 0

[releng] Issue #7320: please create f28-kde koji side target

by Rex Dieter

rdieter reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following: `` Please create a f28-kde koji side target. It will be invaluable to work on batched builds (Qt5, in particular) to avoid and minimize breaking rawhide depenedencies in the meantime. Thanks. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7320

4 years, 10 months

5
18
0 / 0

[releng] Issue #7552: enable epel7-kde koji target

by Rex Dieter

rdieter reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following: `` Will begin work on a large batch of interdependant builds, please (re)enable epel7-kde koji target, koji add-target epel7-kde epel7-kde thanks. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7552

4 years, 10 months

4
10
0 / 0

[releng] Issue #7523: rubygem-connection_pool mess

by Vít Ondruch

vondruch reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following: `` There is package rubygem-connection_pool, where although the review was finished \[[1]\], the package was never imported neither built. Later, somebody wanted to use rubygem-connection_pool, so there was other review \[[2]\]. This was approved (while unnoticed, there is rubygem-connection_pool already in Fedora) and repository rubygem-connection-pool was requested (please note the dash instead of underscore in the repository name). From there, there are coming builds of rubygem-connection_pool here \[[3]\]. Somebody later noticed and retired the rubygem-connection-pool package \[[4]\], but really, I am not sure this was the best possible action. There are several concerns: 1. It is not obvious what happened and where the package is coming from. It is surprising, that the repo request was approved, although it did not match the review. 2. The package is escaping mass rebuilds. Actually I am surprised this kind of repositories is not detected/reported after rebuild. 3. It is not obvious who is maintaining the package. For (1) and (2), I hope you can check your tooling and avoid these situations in the future. For (3) neither one of the current maintainers is really active. I haven't hear about @anujmore for past 4 years. I've heard about @axilleas, but I believe he is busy with other stuff. @ilgrad might still be interested in this package. I can also take the package over, since it is dependency of Ruby on Rails. [1]: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967334 [2]: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1267328 [3]: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=16736 [4]: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rubygem-connection-pool/commits/master `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7523

4 years, 10 months

3
8
0 / 0

[releng] Issue #7215: older drpms not synced

by Kevin Fenzi

kevin reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following: `` As noted in this post: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.o... it seems we are only syncing out the drpms made in that specific compose. We should keep a (ideally configurable) amount of older ones around. I think for rawhide we were keeping 2 weeks, we could start with that. as it is now unless someone updates on the day an update is pushed they won't get the advantage of the drpm. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7215

4 years, 11 months

3
3
0 / 0

[releng] Issue #7548: Fedora 29 Change: NSS load p11-kit modules by default

by Daiki Ueno

ueno reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following: `` Hello, Could you review your impact with https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NSSLoadP11KitModules ? `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7548

4 years, 11 months

4
3
0 / 0

[releng] Issue #7275: provide casync index and object storage files for images on getfedora.org

by Basti Endres

sedrubal reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following: `` [casync](https://github.com/systemd/casync) is like a new and better rsync for directory trees, binary files and system images. It can speed up downloads if the user already has a similar image on his local machine. For example if a user already has fedora 26 and he wants to download fedora 27 he can use fedora 26 as local seed and download only differences using casync. The same applies if he has fedora workstation and he wants to download fedora server. It was great if you provide a `.caibx` index file for each image and a (global) `.castr` object storage on the fedora ftp mirrors. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7275

4 years, 11 months

5
9
0 / 0

[releng] Issue #7300: Deny push / Implement git hook for unescaped macro in %changelog

by Igor Gnatenko

ignatenkobrain reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following: `` ```python #!/usr/bin/python3 import re import sys replace = False out = [] with open(sys.argv[1], "r"): for l in open(sys.argv[1], "r"): out.append(l) if l.startswith("%changelog"): replace = True continue if not replace: continue if l.startswith("%"): replace = False continue if l.startswith("*"): # XXX: HACK continue out[-1] = re.sub(r"([^%])%([^% \n\d])", r"\1%%\2", l) with open(sys.argv[1], "w") as f: f.writelines(out) ``` This is something I've been using for automatic fix myself. I think we should either prohibit pushing this or have git-hook which would fix it automatically. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7300

4 years, 11 months

5
9
0 / 0

[releng] Issue #7524: Koji builder changes its time suddenly

by Pavel Valena

pvalena reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following: `` In build log, there occurs: ``` make: Warning: File 'abrt_prelude.rb' has modification time 69 s in the future ``` Then executing part of the test suite (in %check) results in (re)compiling a part of code we did not intend to (or at all), and failure occurs: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/8343/27188343/build.log https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/8339/27188339/build.log https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/8030/27168030/build.log https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/8026/27168026/build.log `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7524

4 years, 12 months

6
17
0 / 0

[releng] PR #7366: add script for pruning atomic ostree repos

by Dusty Mabe

dustymabe opened a new pull-request against the project: `releng` that you are following: `` add script for pruning atomic ostree repos `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/pull-request/7366

5 years

7
46
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

rel-eng June 2018