[releng] Issue #7673: Tag few modules into f28-modular
by Igor Gnatenko
ignatenkobrain reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following:
``
# Describe the issue
Turns out, previous builds of following modules were built with broken binutils which produced incorrect binaries. Also they are now contain newer version of apps.
Please tag following builds into f28-modular:
* `ripgrep-master-20180804140932.b33445dc`
* `gcsf-master-20180804153258.b33445dc`
# When do you need this? (YYYY/MM/DD)
asap.
# When is this no longer needed or useful? (YYYY/MM/DD)
When F28 gets EOL.
* If we cannot complete your request, what is the impact?
Modules which are shipped to users are broken in some way.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7673
5 years, 9 months
[releng] Issue #7693: Broken signatures fedora 29 and rawhide
by clime
clime reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following:
``
* Describe the issue
I was testing this on docker images from docker.io:
First for rawhide image:
[root@6731300cebda /]# rpm -Kv /var/cache/dnf/rawhide-2d95c80a1fa0a67d/package/findutils-4.6.0-20.fc29.x86_64.rpm
/var/cache/dnf/rawhide-2d95c80a1fa0a67d/packages/findutils-4.6.0-20.fc29.x86_64.rpm:
Header V3 RSA/SHA256 Signature, key ID 429476b4: OK
Header SHA1 digest: OK
Header SHA256 digest: OK
Payload SHA256 digest: OK
V3 RSA/SHA256 Signature, key ID 429476b4: OK
MD5 digest: OK
[root@6731300cebda /]# rpm -Kv /var/cache/dnf/rawhide-2d95c80a1fa0a67d/packages/iputils-20180629-2.fc29.x86_64.rpm
/var/cache/dnf/rawhide-2d95c80a1fa0a67d/packages/iputils-20180629-2.fc29.x86_64.rpm:
Header V3 RSA/SHA256 Signature, key ID cfc659b9: NOKEY
Header SHA1 digest: OK
Header SHA256 digest: OK
Payload SHA256 digest: OK
V3 RSA/SHA256 Signature, key ID cfc659b9: NOKEY
findutils is signed with key for f29, iptutils packages is signed with f30 key. This is one problem.
Then:
$ docker run -it fedora:29 /bin/bash
Unable to find image 'fedora:29' locally
Trying to pull repository docker.io/library/fedora ...
Trying to pull repository registry.fedoraproject.org/fedora ...
sha256:521225b1a14aba45bdbce042f42f2f457813b0fdd58989325a7fa5321a223387: Pulling from registry.fedoraproject.org/fedora
f5b598b9ce0d: Already exists
Digest: sha256:521225b1a14aba45bdbce042f42f2f457813b0fdd58989325a7fa5321a223387
Status: Downloaded newer image for registry.fedoraproject.org/fedora:29
[root@6e404362fec1 /]#
[root@6e404362fec1 /]# cat /etc/redhat-release
Fedora release 29 (Rawhide)
So for fedora:29 the situation is the same because I actually got rawhide instead of f29.
* When do you need this? (YYYY/MM/DD)
At some feasible time.
* When is this no longer needed or useful? (YYYY/MM/DD)
Always useful.
* If we cannot complete your request, what is the impact?
docker images for f29 and fedora-rawhide are unusuable.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7693
5 years, 9 months
[releng] Issue #7727: re-assign python-configobj from orphan to somebody
else (maybe me)
by Dan Callaghan
dcallagh reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following:
``
* Name of the package?
python-configobj
* Maintainer's FAS username?
dcallagh
* Any extra information?
The package has existing maintainers and I do not want to steal it from them if they are still active in Fedora (lmacken I think is not, but I'm not sure about the other co-maintainers listed).
So before handing over the package to me, let's wait a little while to see if any of the co-maintainers speak up.
@fale @lmacken @terjeros the python-configobj package is currently listed as an orphan, would any of you like to volunteer to take it over as point of contact? If so please reply in this ticket.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7727
5 years, 9 months
Fedora Release Engineering Meeting Summary for 2018-08-30
by Mohan Boddu
======================================
#fedora-meeting-2: RELENG (2018-08-30)
======================================
Meeting started by mboddu at 17:00:10 UTC. The full logs are available
athttps://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2018-08-30/releng.20...
.
Meeting summary
---------------
* init process (mboddu, 17:00:10)
* Alternate Architecture Updates (mboddu, 17:01:38)
* nirik debugged the issue and contacted virt team. We are currently
waiting on their feedback. More info @
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7703 and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1614948 (mboddu,
17:09:41)
* There seems to be an issue with anaconda when installing on a VM
with 2 gigs of mem and booting container images on armhfp (mboddu,
17:30:35)
* #7718 The FTBFS cleanup policy is not happening (mboddu, 17:31:13)
* LINK: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7718 (mboddu, 17:31:22)
* We have to work on the tooling and once its done, we will enable it
(mboddu, 17:37:26)
* Open Floor (mboddu, 17:37:49)
Meeting ended at 17:44:45 UTC.
Action Items
------------
Action Items, by person
-----------------------
* **UNASSIGNED**
* (none)
People Present (lines said)
---------------------------
* mboddu (51)
* sharkcz (21)
* nirik (19)
* zodbot (7)
* pbrobinson (5)
* bcotton (1)
* pwhalen (1)
* tyll (0)
* puiterwijk (0)
* masta (0)
* Kellin (0)
* dustymabe (0)
* pingou (0)
* maxamillion (0)
Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4
.. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot
5 years, 9 months