September 2018 - rel-eng - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[releng] Issue #6676: f26 mass branching followups

by Suzanne Yeghiayan

syeghiay added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` @mohanboddu has to create the pull requests in a nicely documented way. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/6676

5 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[releng] Issue #6365: "Broken dependencies" report does not understand rich dependencies

by Suzanne Yeghiayan

syeghiay added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` Assigning to @mohanboddu `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/6365

5 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[releng] Issue #6365: "Broken dependencies" report does not understand rich dependencies

by Suzanne Yeghiayan

The issue: `"Broken dependencies" report does not understand rich dependencies` of project: `releng` has been assigned to `mohanboddu` by syeghiay. https://pagure.io/releng/issue/6365

5 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[releng] Issue #6230: sign our docker images

by Suzanne Yeghiayan

syeghiay added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` No change in status. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/6230

5 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[releng] Issue #7595: F29 System-wide change: Update Boost to 1.67

by Jonathan Wakely

jwakely reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following: `` Change proposal: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F29Boost167 This will require a side tag for me to do the rebuilds. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7595

5 years, 8 months

3
8
0 / 0

[releng] Issue #7475: Changes/glibc 2.28, gcc 8.0, bintuils 2.30

by Carlos O'Donell

codonell reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following: `` All Fedora releases must be released using a released and supported version of the core toolchain involving glibc, gcc, and binutils. The Fedora toolchain team is responsible for ensuring that Fedora Rawhide stabilizes static linking, code generation, and library ABI, before a Fedora release, or that after the branch that the Fedora release is rebased (a very small rebase) to the final released version. This is a requirement for Fedora to inherit the ABI and API guarantees provided by upstream. If a mass rebuild is required by binutils, gcc, glibc or other components, the Fedora toolcahin team will ensure coordination with release engineering such that a mass rebuild uses the released version of all components and fix any last minute ABI or code-generation changes. As of 2018-04-30 the Fedora toolchain team is requesting a mass rebuild for the Fedora 29 release. Reasons given: * Fix LD_AUDIT / latrace developer tooling issues with binaries compiled without PLT/GOT entries. Recompilation should add back PLT/GOT entries required for developer tooling to work. This is coupled with the binutils mass rebuild. Change page for review: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GLIBC228 Owner: Carlos O'Donell carlos(a)redhat.com glibc mass rebuild request: This request. Change page for review: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BINUTILS230 Owner: Nick Clifton <nickc(a)redhat.com> binutils mass rebuild request: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7282 Note that gcc 8 remains the gcc to be used in f29 and no mass rebuild is required for gcc 8 (checked with Jeff Law about this today 2018-04-30). gcc mass rebuild request: Not needed. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7475

5 years, 8 months

4
11
0 / 0

[releng] Issue #7799: Unorphan/Unretire syn v0.13

by Igor Gnatenko

ignatenkobrain reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following: `` ## Name of the package? * `rust-proc-macro2-0.3` * `rust-quote0.5` * `rust-syn0.13` ## FAS username of the new maintainer? @ignatenkobrain ## Any extra information? I've retired them just 10 minutes ago because nothing uses it, but turns out it will be needed for some package I'm packaging now. So if you could give it back to me, would be awesome. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7799

5 years, 8 months

2
3
0 / 0

[releng] Issue #7789: xmakemol not showing up in updates system

by Susi Lehtola

jussilehtola reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following: `` The new xmakemol package, approved in BZ #1626102, and succesfully built in koji for rawide, f28, f29, el6 and epel7, is not showing up in the updates system package list ("unable to find any packages that match the current query"). `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7789

5 years, 8 months

3
3
0 / 0

[releng] Issue #7794: Release f29/s2i-core container

by Clement Verna

cverna reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following: `` * Describe the issue Can you release the following tags for f29/s2i-core container: "0-5.f29container", "0", "latest" * When do you need this? (YYYY/MM/DD) * When is this no longer needed or useful? (YYYY/MM/DD) * If we cannot complete your request, what is the impact? `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7794

5 years, 8 months

2
2
0 / 0

[releng] PR #7798: Use the correct index number to trim container base image tags

by Clement Verna

cverna opened a new pull-request against the project: `releng` that you are following: `` Use the correct index number to trim container base image tags `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/pull-request/7798

5 years, 8 months

2
1
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

rel-eng September 2018