January 2019 - rel-eng - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[releng] Issue #8057: Unblock/reactivate the 9.6 stream branch of the postgresql module

by Nils Philippsen

nphilipp reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following: `` * Describe the issue The `9.6` stream branch of the `postgresql` module is inactive, probably because it's past its EOL date which was set to 2018-12-01 when it was created. The maintainer of the module @praiskup reported this to the [Modularity Tracker](https://pagure.io/modularity/issue/123). Two possible remedies come to mind: - Manually set the `bug_fixes` (and `security_fixes`?) EOL date for the `modules/postgresql:9.6` branch to 2021-12-01, corresponding with the upstream EOL date of 2021-11-11. - Or, ignore the SL metadata when determining which branch is active ([background](https://pagure.io/modularity/issue/124#comment-549423), [#2](https://pagure.io/modularity/issue/112)). This probably involves changes in code/scripts. * When do you need this? (YYYY/MM/DD) I assume the sooner the better. @praiskup? * When is this no longer needed or useful? (YYYY/MM/DD) End of 2021 when 9.6 maintenance ceases upstream. * If we cannot complete your request, what is the impact? The `9.6` stream can't be updated. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8057

5 years, 3 months

4
5
0 / 0

[releng] PR #8075: Use Fedora 29 for Vagrant

by Filip Valder

fivaldi opened a new pull-request against the project: `releng` that you are following: `` Use Fedora 29 for Vagrant `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/pull-request/8075

5 years, 3 months

3
4
0 / 0

[releng] PR #8082: Mass rebuild modules

by Mohan Boddu

mohanboddu opened a new pull-request against the project: `releng` that you are following: `` Mass rebuild modules `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/pull-request/8082

5 years, 3 months

3
41
0 / 0

[releng] Issue #8035: Unretire js-jquery2

by Vít Ondruch

vondruch reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following: `` * Name of the package? js=jquery2 * FAS username of the new maintainer? vondruch * Branches that you need it to be unretired for? f30 * Package re-review BZ URL? Non. I hope I made it in two weeks. * Any extra information? If somebody is going to dispute this unretirement, I will bundle js-jquery2 in rubygem-jquery-rails: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rubygem-jquery-rails/blob/master/f/rub... `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8035

5 years, 3 months

3
12
0 / 0

[releng] Issue #8059: increase rootfs size for ppc64le composes

by Dan Horák

sharkcz reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following: `` * Describe the issue The installer runtime image (install.img) created by lorax is 2GB in size, the content written there by lorax fits into the 2GB space, but there isn't enough free space for anaconda in runtime. As a result the installation on ppc64le crashes. See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1666298 One possible solution is to explicitly set a bigger rootfs size for ppc64le compose similarly to what is done for cloud images in the Fedora pungi config. * When do you need this? (YYYY/MM/DD) ASAP * When is this no longer needed or useful? (YYYY/MM/DD) N/A * If we cannot complete your request, what is the impact? non-installable ppc64le compose `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8059

5 years, 3 months

2
3
0 / 0

[releng] Issue #8055: Delete accidentally created branches on the rpms/module-build-service repo

by Matt Prahl

mprahl reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following: `` * Describe the issue Instead of creating a fork, I created the branches `pungi-dep` and `pungi-dep2` on the rpms/module-build-service dist-git repo in preparation for a PR. Could you please remove them? * When do you need this? (YYYY/MM/DD) Whenever there is time. This is not urgent at all. * When is this no longer needed or useful? (YYYY/MM/DD) N/A * If we cannot complete your request, what is the impact? No real impact. This is just a cosmetic fix. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8055

5 years, 3 months

2
2
0 / 0

[releng] Issue #7664: Delete rawhide-repo-holder build target

by Mikolaj Izdebski

mizdebsk reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following: `` * Describe the issue Presence of [rawhide-repo-holder](https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildtargetinfo?... build target in Koji makes kojira generate repos for [rawhide](https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taginfo?tagID=197) tag, which according to @puiterwijk is not used any longer. * When do you need this? (YYYY/MM/DD) earliest convenience * When is this no longer needed or useful? (YYYY/MM/DD) * If we cannot complete your request, what is the impact? Koji resources are wasted generating unneeded repos. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7664

5 years, 3 months

3
5
0 / 0

[pungi-fedora] PR #684: set installer image size to 3GB on ppc64le

by Dan Horák

sharkcz opened a new pull-request against the project: `pungi-fedora` that you are following: `` set installer image size to 3GB on ppc64le `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/684

5 years, 4 months

3
7
0 / 0

[releng] Issue #8090: python-openshift branches exist in PDC but not dist-git

by Jason Montleon

jmontleon reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following: `` * Describe the issue These requests for epel7 and f29 were closed invalid with, "The branch in PDC already exists" https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/9556 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/9557 The branches don't exist in dist-git and can't be pushed: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-openshift/branches * When do you need this? (YYYY/MM/DD) Next several days * When is this no longer needed or useful? (YYYY/MM/DD) N/A * If we cannot complete your request, what is the impact? I think someday it will delay RDO, but I'm not aware of any pressing date. They asked for us to release the package in Fedora/EPEL. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8090

5 years, 4 months

2
2
0 / 0

[releng] Issue #8061: ChangeF30/Boost-1.69

by Denis Arnaud

denisarnaud reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following: `` * As per the [accepted change of having Boost 1.69 on Rawhide/F30](https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F30Boost169), I would need a [side build tag](https://docs.pagure.org/releng/sop_adding_side_build_targets.html), for instance `f30-boost` * Needed as soon as possible (2019/01/19) * When is this no longer needed or useful? (2019/02/28) * If we cannot complete your request, what is the impact? I will have a hard time rebuilding the dependencies on Boost on Rawhide `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8061

5 years, 4 months

5
24
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

rel-eng January 2019