March 2019 - rel-eng - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[pungi-fedora] PR #705: Setup for F30 Beta 1.1

by Mohan Boddu

mohanboddu opened a new pull-request against the project: `pungi-fedora` that you are following: `` Setup for F30 Beta 1.1 `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/705

5 years, 1 month

1
2
0 / 0

[releng] Issue #8197: Atomic Host cloud images switched to being UEFI based

by Dusty Mabe

dustymabe reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following: `` * Describe the issue The Atomic Host cloud images output by the updates pungi composes (kicked off by bodhi) started producing images that only boot in UEFI mode. This happens if the VM anaconda was run in was started in UEFI mode. Something changed that caused this to start happening. The images from [20190227.0](https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/updates/Fedora-29-... are fine while the images from [20190228.0](https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/updates/Fedora-29-... show the problem. There are no package differences between these images. The difference is that if you look at the oz logs from the tasks [20190227.0](https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=33075126) [20190228.0](https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=33107624) you can see that one is choosing BIOS boot and one is choosing UEFI boot: ``` :02:12,338 INFO anaconda:anaconda: bootloader: bootloader GRUB2 on X86 platform ``` vs ``` :25:31,273 INFO anaconda:anaconda: bootloader: bootloader EFIGRUB on EFI platform ``` You can also see in the tdl files the `<nvram template="/usr/share/OVMF/OVMF_VARS.fd"/>` which is a sign of booting via UEFI. This change is causing breakage for Atomic Host release artifacts and is preventing us from releasing the next two week release of Atomic Host. * When do you need this? (YYYY/MM/DD) A fix ASAP would be nice. Ideally we would be able to release tomorrow. * When is this no longer needed or useful? (YYYY/MM/DD) N/A * If we cannot complete your request, what is the impact? No more releases of Atomic Host. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8197

5 years, 1 month

5
29
0 / 0

[releng] Issue #8216: Unorphan google-gson

by Miro Hrončok

churchyard reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following: `` * Name of the package? google-gson * FAS username of the new maintainer? churchyard `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8216

5 years, 1 month

2
3
0 / 0

[releng] Issue #8215: Taking over orphaned spec2scl

by Jan Staněk

jstanek reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following: `` The spec2scl was orphaned due to inactive upstream. I'm willing to keep it alive, since it may come handy in my work with CentOS SCLs. I'm also planning to poke at the upstream code and attempt to make it alive again. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8215

5 years, 1 month

2
1
0 / 0

[pungi-fedora] PR #704: Changing to https

by Mohan Boddu

mohanboddu opened a new pull-request against the project: `pungi-fedora` that you are following: `` Changing to https `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/704

5 years, 1 month

2
2
0 / 0

[releng] Issue #8050: Claim orphaned python-rangehttpserver

by Luis Enrique Bazán De León

lbazan reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following: `` Please unorphan python-rangehttpserver - rawhide FAS Account: lbazan Cheers! `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8050

5 years, 1 month

2
8
0 / 0

[releng] Issue #8112: Unorphan rogue

by Michael Thomas

wart reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following: `` * Describe the issue I would like to take ownership of the orphaned package rogue * New owner wart * When do you need this? (YYYY/MM/DD) Whenever convenient * If we cannot complete your request, what is the impact? rogue will be dropped from the games spin `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8112

5 years, 1 month

3
7
0 / 0

[pungi-fedora] PR #703: nightly.sh: make sure we sync 31 containers. Add some comments and a fedmsg at the end after the cleanup.

by Kevin Fenzi

kevin opened a new pull-request against the project: `pungi-fedora` that you are following: `` nightly.sh: make sure we sync 31 containers. Add some comments and a fedmsg at the end after the cleanup. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/703

5 years, 1 month

2
1
0 / 0

[releng] Issue #8209: New container/fedora-toolbox builds not getting pushed out to "stable"

by Debarshi Ray

rishi reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following: `` * Describe the issue See: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-CONTAINER-2019-244fc7be89 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-CONTAINER-2019-1b4cf28755 Those were submitted for a batched push to "stable" 6 days ago. The web UI also says that they were "submitted for stable by bodhi", not sure why. Did I narrowly miss the batch last Tuesday? Or is something wrong? * When do you need this? (YYYY/MM/DD) Before Fedora 28 goes EOL. * When is this no longer needed or useful? (YYYY/MM/DD) Once Fedora 29 goes EOL. * If we cannot complete your request, what is the impact? Those using Fedora 28 & 29 Silverblue systems for development will get a somewhat non-ideal user experience. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8209

5 years, 1 month

4
6
0 / 0

[releng] Issue #8206: Odd old content in https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/rawhide/Everything/SRPMS/Packages/

by Jason ティビツ

tibbs reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following: `` Just a note that there seems to be some old content (from the F29 era) hanging around in https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/rawhide/Everyth... It's not hurting anything but it's about 76GB that probably doesn't need to be there. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8206

5 years, 1 month

3
6
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

rel-eng March 2019