mohanboddu opened a new pull-request against the project: `pungi-fedora` that you are following: `` Split Atomic and CloudImage ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/128
mohanboddu commented on the pull-request: `Split Atomic and CloudImage` that you are following: `` This is to fix : https://pagure.io/releng/issue/6606 ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/128
adamwill commented on the pull-request: `Split Atomic and CloudImage` that you are following: `` Does it really have to be called Fedora-CloudImage? We don't have Fedora-AtomicImage and Fedora-DockerImage. ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/128
ausil commented on the pull-request: `Split Atomic and CloudImage` that you are following: `` It should be fedora-Cloud ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/128
adamwill commented on the pull-request: `Split Atomic and CloudImage` that you are following: `` Except for https://github.com/release-engineering/productmd/issues/77 , of course =) But I think I'm just going to have to teach fedfind some smarts. ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/128
mattdm commented on the pull-request: `Split Atomic and CloudImage` that you are following: `` It should _probably_ be Fedora-AtomicHost and Fedora-CloudBase, for maximum correctness. ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/128
adamwill commented on the pull-request: `Split Atomic and CloudImage` that you are following: `` er, 'correctness' in relation to what? ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/128
mattdm commented on the pull-request: `Split Atomic and CloudImage` that you are following: ``
er, 'correctness' in relation to what?
In relation to the names we use to refer to these deliverables. See https://alt.fedoraproject.org/cloud/ and https://getfedora.org/atomic/download/.
For Cloud, the distinction might be useful if we have Fedora Server for Cloud in the future. For Atomic, it's useful because that brand is so shiny it got attached to a whole spectrum of things (like, I believe RH is using it for the Docker/OCI image). So, being clear that this is Atomic Host in specific is helpful. ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/128
ausil commented on the pull-request: `Split Atomic and CloudImage` that you are following: ``
er, 'correctness' in relation to what?
In relation to the names we use to refer to these deliverables. See https://alt.fedoraproject.org/cloud/ and https://getfedora.org/atomic/download/. For Cloud, the distinction might be useful if we have Fedora Server for Cloud in the future. For Atomic, it's useful because that brand is so shiny it got attached to a whole spectrum of things (like, I believe RH is using it for the Docker/OCI image). So, being clear that this is Atomic Host in specific is helpful.
the compose name and artifacts in them are two very different things. ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/128
ausil commented on the pull-request: `Split Atomic and CloudImage` that you are following: `` no such variant ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/128
ausil commented on the pull-request: `Split Atomic and CloudImage` that you are following: `` No such variant ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/128
ausil commented on the pull-request: `Split Atomic and CloudImage` that you are following: `` No such variant ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/128
ausil commented on the pull-request: `Split Atomic and CloudImage` that you are following: `` No such variant ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/128
ausil commented on the pull-request: `Split Atomic and CloudImage` that you are following: `` No such variant ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/128
ausil commented on the pull-request: `Split Atomic and CloudImage` that you are following: `` this should be called fedora-cloud.conf and this script should be cloud-nightly.sh ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/128
ausil commented on the pull-request: `Split Atomic and CloudImage` that you are following: `` we should probably sync this to /pub/alt/ somewhere like we do atomic. though a case could be made for not syncing it ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/128
ausil commented on the pull-request: `Split Atomic and CloudImage` that you are following: `` Fedora-Cloud ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/128
ausil commented on the pull-request: `Split Atomic and CloudImage` that you are following: `` Fedora-Cloud ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/128
ausil commented on the pull-request: `Split Atomic and CloudImage` that you are following: `` we still have CloudImages, but only the atomic based ones this change should not happen ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/128
ausil commented on the pull-request: `Split Atomic and CloudImage` that you are following: `` too aggressive in removal ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/128
ausil commented on the pull-request: `Split Atomic and CloudImage` that you are following: `` This needs to stay ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/128
ausil commented on the pull-request: `Split Atomic and CloudImage` that you are following: `` This needs to stay ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/128
ausil commented on the pull-request: `Split Atomic and CloudImage` that you are following: `` This should be in the atomic compose still ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/128
ausil commented on the pull-request: `Split Atomic and CloudImage` that you are following: `` the install tree would come from the GA cloud variant, which does not live here ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/128
ausil merged a pull-request against the project: `pungi-fedora` that you are following.
Merged pull-request:
`` Split Atomic and CloudImage ``
rel-eng@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Adam Williamson -
Dennis Gilmore
-
Matthew Miller
-
Mohan Boddu