8:05 a.m.
Bryan Kearney wrote:
Thank you for reviewing. I am going to respond to the items below,
and
also introduce the issue that we would like to see this spin delivered
not as an ISO, but as a disk image. That will help scope some of the
answers below. This will change the release engineering a bit as the
image will need to be built with the appliance-tools, istead of
livecd-tools. The appliance-tools are based on the livecd-tools base
clases, so the process should not be much different.
This is a point we need to pass through release engineering (in CC:).
Could release engineering please review/address this particular request?
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
-kanarip
8:27 a.m.
New subject: [Fedora-spins] Appliance Operating System (AOS) REVIEW - NEEDINFO
Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
Bryan Kearney wrote:
> Thank you for reviewing. I am going to respond to the items below, and
> also introduce the issue that we would like to see this spin delivered
> not as an ISO, but as a disk image. That will help scope some of the
> answers below. This will change the release engineering a bit as the
> image will need to be built with the appliance-tools, istead of
> livecd-tools. The appliance-tools are based on the livecd-tools base
> clases, so the process should not be much different.
>
This is a point we need to pass through release engineering (in CC:).
Could release engineering please review/address this particular request?
Note that appliance-tools is not yet in rawhide, but has a completed
review request / cvs done in RH BZ
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457152 (no builds in koji
yet and no CVS import yet that I can see).
Hence the appliance-tools util has not been used by the Spin SIG to
technically review the spin concept (yet), but we've been using
livecd-tools.
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
-kanarip
9:16 a.m.
New subject: [Fedora-spins] Appliance Operating System (AOS) REVIEW - NEEDINFO
Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
> Bryan Kearney wrote:
>> Thank you for reviewing. I am going to respond to the items below, and
>> also introduce the issue that we would like to see this spin delivered
>> not as an ISO, but as a disk image. That will help scope some of the
>> answers below. This will change the release engineering a bit as the
>> image will need to be built with the appliance-tools, istead of
>> livecd-tools. The appliance-tools are based on the livecd-tools base
>> clases, so the process should not be much different.
>>
> This is a point we need to pass through release engineering (in CC:).
>
> Could release engineering please review/address this particular request?
>
Note that appliance-tools is not yet in rawhide, but has a completed
review request / cvs done in RH BZ
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457152 (no builds in koji
yet and no CVS import yet that I can see).
Hence the appliance-tools util has not been used by the Spin SIG to
technically review the spin concept (yet), but we've been using
livecd-tools.
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
-kanarip
Just wanted to check in with both groups. What are the next steps which
Huff and I should be taking to ensure the spin is in F10?
Thanks in advance!
-- bk
10:21 a.m.
New subject: [Fedora-spins] Appliance Operating System (AOS) REVIEW - NEEDINFO
Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
>
Note that appliance-tools is not yet in rawhide, but has a completed
review request / cvs done in RH BZ
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457152 (no builds in koji
yet and no CVS import yet that I can see).
Hence the appliance-tools util has not been used by the Spin SIG to
technically review the spin concept (yet), but we've been using
livecd-tools.
Jeroen:
With the effects of last week, do you have new dates for spin requests
and reviews? I want to make sure we are on track for the aos spin.
-- bk
11:18 a.m.
New subject: [Fedora-spins] Appliance Operating System (AOS) REVIEW - NEEDINFO
Bryan Kearney wrote:
Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
>>
>
> Note that appliance-tools is not yet in rawhide, but has a completed
> review request / cvs done in RH BZ
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457152 (no builds in koji
> yet and no CVS import yet that I can see).
This has been taken care of, the first build of appliance-tools is in
koji. The only issue is that it requires a newer version of
livecd-tools with the latest patches applied. I have created a temporary
version of livecd-tools to use for testing until an official build is
out(looks to be this week,) every thing is available here for testing:
thincrust.org/download
>
> Hence the appliance-tools util has not been used by the Spin SIG to
> technically review the spin concept (yet), but we've been using
> livecd-tools.
Jeroen:
With the effects of last week, do you have new dates for spin requests
and reviews? I want to make sure we are on track for the aos spin.
-- bk
Is there anything we can do to help out here? Do we need to submit an
aos kisckstart file to the spin repo?
Ps. for some reason I am having issues being added to the
fedora-spins(a)lists.fedoraproject.org if anyone can help me I would
appreciate it.
-D
5:09 a.m.
New subject: [Fedora-spins] Appliance Operating System (AOS) REVIEW - NEEDINFO
David Huff wrote:
Ps. for some reason I am having issues being added to the
fedora-spins(a)lists.fedoraproject.org if anyone can help me I would
appreciate it.
Added you to the list, you should have received a notification.
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
-kanarip
5:26 a.m.
New subject: [Fedora-spins] Appliance Operating System (AOS) REVIEW - APPROVED
Bryan Kearney wrote:
Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
> Note that appliance-tools is not yet in rawhide, but has a completed
> review request / cvs done in RH BZ
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457152 (no builds in koji
> yet and no CVS import yet that I can see).
>
> Hence the appliance-tools util has not been used by the Spin SIG to
> technically review the spin concept (yet), but we've been using
> livecd-tools.
Jeroen:
With the effects of last week, do you have new dates for spin requests
and reviews? I want to make sure we are on track for the aos spin.
With the suggested changes and the continuing effort to put
appliance-tools as well as a patched version of livecd-tools into
rawhide, I can approve this spin.
Next steps are to request Board Trademark approval, followed by getting
FESCo's approval for the feature (which I think as a general feature has
been approved already), for which (as far as the spins is concerned)
FESCo has enforced release engineering. I think a very, very hard
requirement on their end is that both appliance-tools and the patched
version of livecd-tools land in rawhide, but I'll leave that to them ;-)
Would the spin maintainers (bkearney and dhuff) please request commit
access to the spin-kickstarts repository by means of joining the
gitspin-kickstarts group at
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/group/view/gitspin-kickstarts ?
I'll be pushing the latest version of fedora-aos.ks into the repo shortly.
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
-kanarip
7:21 a.m.
New subject: [Fedora-spins] Appliance Operating System (AOS) REVIEW - APPROVED
Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
Bryan Kearney wrote:
> Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
With the suggested changes and the continuing effort to put
appliance-tools as well as a patched version of livecd-tools into
rawhide, I can approve this spin.
Next steps are to request Board Trademark approval,
Is this done at a board IRC meeting?
followed by getting
FESCo's approval for the feature (which I think as a general
feature has
been approved already), for which (as far as the spins is concerned)
FESCo has enforced release engineering. I think a very, very hard
requirement on their end is that both appliance-tools and the patched
version of livecd-tools land in rawhide, but I'll leave that to them ;-)
Do we put in tickets for this for RELENG?
-- bk
8:03 a.m.
New subject: [Fedora-spins] Appliance Operating System (AOS) REVIEW - APPROVED
Bryan Kearney wrote:
Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
> Bryan Kearney wrote:
>> Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
> With the suggested changes and the continuing effort to put
> appliance-tools as well as a patched version of livecd-tools into
> rawhide, I can approve this spin.
>
> Next steps are to request Board Trademark approval,
Is this done at a board IRC meeting?
I guess it happens at a Board meeting in general, by submitting the
abstract / wiki page to fedora-advisory-board(a)redhat.com, with a topic
similar to:
Request for Trademark Approval (Fedora AOS Spin)
Do we put in tickets for this for RELENG?
I do not see tickets for creating spins currently, that is in the
release engineering trac instance on fedorahosted.org, and I guess that
once the board approves the trademark usage, FESCo's Feature Wrangler
will put the Feature page into the correct Category which is also a
tracker location for Release Engineering, but correct me if I'm wrong.
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
-kanarip
9:38 a.m.
New subject: [Fedora-spins] Appliance Operating System (AOS) REVIEW - APPROVED
On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 15:03 +0200, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
Bryan Kearney wrote:
> Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
>> Bryan Kearney wrote:
>>> Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
>> With the suggested changes and the continuing effort to put
>> appliance-tools as well as a patched version of livecd-tools into
>> rawhide, I can approve this spin.
>>
>> Next steps are to request Board Trademark approval,
>
> Is this done at a board IRC meeting?
>
I guess it happens at a Board meeting in general, by submitting the
abstract / wiki page to fedora-advisory-board(a)redhat.com, with a topic
similar to:
Request for Trademark Approval (Fedora AOS Spin)
That method has worked fine thus far. We look at these every week.
--
Paul W. Frields
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
http://paul.frields.org/ - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
5758
days inactive
5772
days old
rel-eng@lists.fedoraproject.org
9 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Bryan Kearney -
David Huff -
Jeroen van Meeuwen -
Paul W. Frields