codonell added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` As of right now glibc 2.25 for Fedora 26, based on the final upstream 2.25 (released 3 days ago) is building in rawhide (https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=17682458), and scratch builds all passed already.
It is important that we use the final glibc 2.25 for mass rebuilds, just as important as using the right compiler.
The issue with glibc is that it forms the basis of the lowest-level ABI and API guarantees we have in the distribution. As the final glibc release approaches we keep rawhide in sync as close as possible. Therefore day-to-day we know exactly where we stand. The _final_ touches are that we move Rawhide to the official release tag such that upstream provides Fedora all the assurances of an ABI guarantee. In reality we are 99.99% assured anyway, but we like to meet the letter of the guarantee by being on the right branch. That's what we're doing here.
So I'm OK with the mass rebuild as long as glibc-2.25-1 is used. ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/6577
rel-eng@lists.fedoraproject.org