tstellar reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following: `` * Describe the issue I need to break the ABI of libLLVM.so without a soname bump in order to fix an llvm bug[1]. I need a side-tag in order to rebuild all dependent packages without creating a disruption.
[1] https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39427 * When do you need this? (YYYY/MM/DD) 2018/11/01 * When is this no longer needed or useful? (YYYY/MM/DD) 2019/08/01 * If we cannot complete your request, what is the impact? Users will not be able to link programs compiled with clang against Fedora's llvm-libs package.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7900
mohanboddu added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` @tstellar Please use the side-tag template when requesting side tags. You can find the template when creating the ticket under "Types" just below the ticket title.
Anyway, can you answer: * Name of the side tag?
* Number of builds that are expected in the side tag?
* How long do you need the side tag?
* Any extra information?
Thanks. ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7900
tstellar added a new comment to an issue you are following: ``
@tstellar Please use the side-tag template when requesting side tags. You can find the template when creating the ticket under "Types" just below the ticket title.
OK, I will do that next time.
Anyway, can you answer:
- Name of the side tag?
llvm-7-abi-fix
Number of builds that are expected in the side tag?
9
How long do you need the side tag?
1 Month
Any extra information?
No.
Thanks.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7900
mohanboddu added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` @tstellar And what release you are planning it for?
I should have been more clearer with the "Name of the side tag" generally people ask something like f29-blah or f30-bleh side tag. Which helps me in identifying which release they are planning it for.
I will update the template and will be more clearer.
Sorry for the delay. ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7900
tstellar added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` It's for rawhide: f30 ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7900
mohanboddu added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` @tstellar f30-llvm tag has been created:
$ koji add-tag f30-llvm --parent=f30-build --arches='armv7hl i686 x86_64 aarch64 ppc64le s390x' $ koji add-target f30-llvm f30-llvm
You can do builds with:
$ fedpkg build –target=f30-llvm
Let us know when you are done and we will move all the builds into f30.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7900
mohanboddu added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` @tstellar Any update here? ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7900
mohanboddu added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` @tstellar Any update? We are branching tomorrow, so it would be great if we can merge them before then. ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7900
tstellar added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` @sergesanspaille is working on this, there are still a few more packages to do. ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7900
pwalter added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` If you guys need help to move this along faster, I'd be happy to create a llvm7 package for ABI compat. ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7900
tstellar added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` @sergesanspaille is building the compat packages now. I think these are the last packages left to do. ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7900
sergesanspaille added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` @mohanboddu : there's one arch missing for clang7.0, then I'll rebuild pocl and we'll be able to merge. So we'll merge *after* the branching, is it safe if I do this tomorrow (20190220) ? ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7900
mohanboddu added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` @sergesanspaille If we do it tomorrow, we can either merge them into either branched(F30) or rawhide(F31) but not both. ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7900
mohanboddu added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` @sergesanspaille Sorry, my mistake, we can tag them both release mentioned above.
Thanks @ignatenkobrain @kevin for correcting me. ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7900
sergesanspaille added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` @mohanboddu I think rawhide will be enough, @tstellar correct me if I'm wrong. ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7900
kalev added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` @tstellar @sergesanspaille Would it be possible to merge this today? llvm 8 is supposed to land in F30 as well, not just rawhide/F31 that's 8 months away, right?
We have a GNOME test day on Monday and I'd like to make sure the desktop stack changes (mesa/llvm) are landed before the test day so that I have a chance to make sure things work together and make sure we have a test day image. ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7900
sergesanspaille added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` @kalev there's an issue with the pocl package I'd like to discuss about with @tstellar first. ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7900
sergesanspaille added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` All packages I wanted to add to f30-llvm now build correctly, two more should come in as soon as the associated PR are merged and this should be of for Monday. ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7900
mohanboddu added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` @sergesanspaille Please let us know when its done and we will merge them into either F30 or F31 or both. Thanks. ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7900
sergesanspaille added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` @mohanboddu should be okay now, thanks *a lot* for your patience! ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7900
sergesanspaille added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` (merging for both f30 and f31 please) ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7900
ignatenkobrain added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` ``` ⋊> ~/t/r/scripts on master ⨯ python3 ./mass-tag.py -s f30-llvm -t f31-pending 19:39:56 Checking 12 builds... clang-8.0.0-0.2.rc2.fc30 Tagging clang-8.0.0-0.2.rc2.fc30 into f31-pending clang7.0-7.0.1-9.fc30 Tagging clang7.0-7.0.1-9.fc30 into f31-pending compiler-rt-8.0.0-0.2.rc2.fc30 Tagging compiler-rt-8.0.0-0.2.rc2.fc30 into f31-pending libcxx-8.0.0-0.2.rc2.fc30 Tagging libcxx-8.0.0-0.2.rc2.fc30 into f31-pending libcxxabi-8.0.0-0.2.rc2.fc30 Tagging libcxxabi-8.0.0-0.2.rc2.fc30 into f31-pending libomp-8.0.0-0.2.rc2.fc30 Tagging libomp-8.0.0-0.2.rc2.fc30 into f31-pending lld-8.0.0-0.2.rc2.fc30 Tagging lld-8.0.0-0.2.rc2.fc30 into f31-pending lldb-8.0.0-0.2.rc2.fc30 Tagging lldb-8.0.0-0.2.rc2.fc30 into f31-pending llvm-8.0.0-0.2.rc2.fc30 Tagging llvm-8.0.0-0.2.rc2.fc30 into f31-pending llvm-test-suite-8.0.0-0.2.rc2.fc30 Tagging llvm-test-suite-8.0.0-0.2.rc2.fc30 into f31-pending llvm7.0-7.0.1-3.fc30 Tagging llvm7.0-7.0.1-3.fc30 into f31-pending pocl-1.2-1.20190221gita0b083a1b47a738.fc30 Tagging pocl-1.2-1.20190221gita0b083a1b47a738.fc30 into f31-pending Tagging 12 builds. Tagged 12 builds. ⋊> ~/t/r/scripts on master ⨯ python3 ./mass-tag.py -s f30-llvm -t f30-pending 19:40:15 Checking 12 builds... clang-8.0.0-0.2.rc2.fc30 Tagging clang-8.0.0-0.2.rc2.fc30 into f30-pending clang7.0-7.0.1-9.fc30 Tagging clang7.0-7.0.1-9.fc30 into f30-pending compiler-rt-8.0.0-0.2.rc2.fc30 Tagging compiler-rt-8.0.0-0.2.rc2.fc30 into f30-pending libcxx-8.0.0-0.2.rc2.fc30 Tagging libcxx-8.0.0-0.2.rc2.fc30 into f30-pending libcxxabi-8.0.0-0.2.rc2.fc30 Tagging libcxxabi-8.0.0-0.2.rc2.fc30 into f30-pending libomp-8.0.0-0.2.rc2.fc30 Tagging libomp-8.0.0-0.2.rc2.fc30 into f30-pending lld-8.0.0-0.2.rc2.fc30 Tagging lld-8.0.0-0.2.rc2.fc30 into f30-pending lldb-8.0.0-0.2.rc2.fc30 Tagging lldb-8.0.0-0.2.rc2.fc30 into f30-pending llvm-8.0.0-0.2.rc2.fc30 Tagging llvm-8.0.0-0.2.rc2.fc30 into f30-pending llvm-test-suite-8.0.0-0.2.rc2.fc30 Tagging llvm-test-suite-8.0.0-0.2.rc2.fc30 into f30-pending llvm7.0-7.0.1-3.fc30 Tagging llvm7.0-7.0.1-3.fc30 into f30-pending pocl-1.2-1.20190221gita0b083a1b47a738.fc30 Tagging pocl-1.2-1.20190221gita0b083a1b47a738.fc30 into f30-pending Tagging 12 builds. Tagged 12 builds. ``` ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7900
The status of the issue: `New side tag for rawhide llvm 7.0 ABI change.` of project: `releng` has been updated to: Closed as Fixed by mohanboddu.
mohanboddu added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` Thanks @ignatenkobrain ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7900
rel-eng@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Igor Gnatenko -
Kalev Lember
-
Mohan Boddu
-
Pete Walter
-
Serge Guelton
-
Tom Stellard