[pungi-fedora] PR #234: atomic: move to new versioning scheme for ostree

[Dusty Mabe]

dustymabe opened a new pull-request against the project: `pungi-fedora` that you are
following:
``
atomic: move to new versioning scheme for ostree
``

To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/234

[Lubomír Sedlář]

lsedlar commented on the pull-request: `atomic: move to new versioning scheme for ostree`
that you are following:
``
Syntax wise looks good to me.
``

To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/234

[Dennis Gilmore]

ausil commented on the pull-request: `atomic: move to new versioning scheme for ostree`
that you are following:
``
I am not sure this will give you what you want.  but hey lets try
``

To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/234

[Dennis Gilmore]

ausil merged a pull-request against the project: `pungi-fedora` that you are following.

Merged pull-request:

``
atomic: move to new versioning scheme for ostree
``

https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/234

[Dusty Mabe]

dustymabe commented on the pull-request: `atomic: move to new versioning scheme for
ostree` that you are following:
``
>  I am not sure this will give you what you want.  but hey lets try    
>    
>  
no? what am I missing? 
``

To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/234

[Dennis Gilmore]

ausil commented on the pull-request: `atomic: move to new versioning scheme for ostree`
that you are following:
``
the compose id is the same value as what we have been using 
``

To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/234

[Dennis Gilmore]

ausil commented on the pull-request: `atomic: move to new versioning scheme for ostree`
that you are following:
``
the compose id is the same value as what we have been using 
``

To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/234

[Dusty Mabe]

dustymabe commented on the pull-request: `atomic: move to new versioning scheme for
ostree` that you are following:
``
hey @ausil - so we haven't had a successfull compose since this change was merged so
there isn't a way to tell if this change had an effect or not.

Here is what I have today:

```
[root@localhost ~]# rpm-ostree status
State: idle
Deployments:
● fedora-atomic:fedora/rawhide/x86_64/atomic-host
             Version: 25.44 (2017-05-22 12:02:15)
              Commit: 39b52552979afde8f26f3518bbddaaddf2859cb7948f4e2561ab611273dea534

  fedora-atomic:fedora/rawhide/x86_64/atomic-host
             Version: 25.43 (2017-05-21 12:06:50)
              Commit: b65f8b66ec81557bd3798df7ed951fcbb1d6cdf2b8efe74783885200791620a7
```

The hope is that this change will make the version be something like `20170522.0` instead
of `25.44`. 
``

To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/234

[Dusty Mabe]

dustymabe commented on the pull-request: `atomic: move to new versioning scheme for
ostree` that you are following:
``
from today's compose:

```
[root@localhost ~]# rpm-ostree status
State: idle
Deployments:
● fedora-atomic:fedora/rawhide/x86_64/atomic-host
             Version: Rawhide.20170526.n.0 (2017-05-26 12:54:57)
              Commit: 784ba2b1b0e848734455faa5586544dccc26efc52ecda68cfc3bec6db0285e0c

  fedora-atomic:fedora/rawhide/x86_64/atomic-host
             Version: 25.44 (2017-05-22 12:02:15)
              Commit: 39b52552979afde8f26f3518bbddaaddf2859cb7948f4e2561ab611273dea534
```

looks like it is doing what we want. 
``

To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/234

[Colin Walters]

walters commented on the pull-request: `atomic: move to new versioning scheme for ostree`
that you are following:
``
The `Rawhide` there seems redundant no?
``

To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/234

[Colin Walters]

walters commented on the pull-request: `atomic: move to new versioning scheme for ostree`
that you are following:
``
Oh, or maybe we did decide we needed that, nevermind.
``

To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/234