[pungi-fedora] PR #1164: Update repo to have f39/39 references

[Samyak Jain]

jnsamyak opened a new pull-request against the project: `pungi-fedora` that you are
following:
``
Update repo to have f39/39 references
``

To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/1164

[Neal Gompa]

ngompa commented on the pull-request: `Update repo to have f39/39 references` that you are
following:
``
`Fedora-22` is the alias for BIOS boot environment type (for Anaconda), which is why some
of them stick on that.
``

To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/1164

[Kevin Fenzi]

kevin commented on the pull-request: `Update repo to have f39/39 references` that you are
following:
``
Looks good, but... we do not want to change the 'fedora-22' things. ;) 

Those are there so we tell koji when building images to do things based on a profile in oz
(the thing that koji calls to build images)You will see some 'Fedora-22' and some
'Fedora-30' in there. 

Fedora-22 is when we switched from yum to dnf for the backend. 

Fedora-30 is when arm images moved to uefi. 

Now, it could be that we could figure  out how to just default that out and remove it, but
that might be hard. 
``

To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/1164

[Neal Gompa]

ngompa commented on the pull-request: `Update repo to have f39/39 references` that you are
following:
``
Do we have somewhere this is documented? I knew about -22, but not -30.
``

To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/1164

[Kevin Fenzi]

kevin commented on the pull-request: `Update repo to have f39/39 references` that you are
following:
``
sadly no. I had to look in oz code. ;( 

perhaps we could add a comment / doc here?

``

To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/1164

[Samyak Jain]

jnsamyak commented on the pull-request: `Update repo to have f39/39 references` that you
are following:
``
Thanks for the info @ngompa and @kevin, I'm glad you asked and got to learn something
new;
If you folks like, I can add a quick note in
[sop_mass_branching](https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/infra/release_gu...
which I think is one of the central parts where we update these versions.

I have updated the PR not to update any distro: * related versions.
``

To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/1164

[Kevin Fenzi]

kevin commented on the pull-request: `Update repo to have f39/39 references` that you are
following:
``
One more small weirdness here. :) 

For flatpaks we only usually build one stream of those... since you can install/run them
anywhere. So, we typically start out using the previous/stable release versions and then
some time before release the flatpak sig moves them to the new branched release. So, I
would say leave the flatpaks showing 38 for now and add a comment above that about keeping
them on the stable release until the flatpak sig says they are ready to move. 

Otherwise looks perfect.
``

To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/1164

[Samyak Jain]

jnsamyak commented on the pull-request: `Update repo to have f39/39 references` that you
are following:
``
Makes sense, I have update it with a comment!
``

To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/1164

[Tomáš Hrčka]

humaton commented on the pull-request: `Update repo to have f39/39 references` that you
are following:
``
Looks good.
``

To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/1164

[Tomáš Hrčka]

humaton merged a pull-request against the project: `pungi-fedora` that you are following.

Merged pull-request:

``
Update repo to have f39/39 references
``

https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/1164