[releng] Issue #7612: moving fedora-release entirely to src.fp.o

[Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek]

zbyszek reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following:
``
* Describe the issue
This is a continuation of the proposal made on fedora-devel late last year and repeated
recently
[https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[e-mail].o...].
The dicussion there didn't result in any decision, and @ausil recommended that it talk
with releng directly.

I'd asking for the following:
- retirement of the seperate "upstream" for fedora-release, i.e. simply merge
https://pagure.io/fedora-release/pull-request/119. This has to be done by one of the
owners of that repo.
- the ability to build fedora-release. I probably can write to dist-git directly as proven
packager, but I'm not sure if I can successfully build the package in koji. Either
way, I'd prefer to be added as co-maintainer to make this official, and for any other
changes that need to be made to be made.
- review of
https://src.fedoraproject.org/fork/zbyszek/rpms/fedora-release/branch/dro....
I can't submit that as PR now, because PRs are disabled.

Stuff that I can do myself, once the above is done:
- enable PRs on src.fp.o/rpms/fedora-release
- resubmit the drop-upstream-split as PR, merge it once it's reviewed, and build
- resubmit other requests against fedora-release as PRs, e.g.
https://pagure.io/fedora-release/pull-request/139 and others.

* When do you need this? A few days or a week would be great. Doing this will allow preset
requests to be processed more quickly, making other things happen faster too.

``

To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7612

[Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek]

zbyszek added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
Hi, any progress on this?
``

To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7612

[Peter Robinson]

pbrobinson added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
Yes, I'm going to take the lead, plan to get to it later this week, early next week
and work with @mboddu on it.
``

To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7612

[Peter Robinson]

The issue: `moving fedora-release entirely to src.fp.o` of project: `releng` has been
assigned to `pbrobinson` by pbrobinson.

https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7612

[Peter Robinson]

pbrobinson added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
Note we need to add some CI/CD for testing PRs to assist with regression etc so if anyone
can assist with that please let me know.
``

To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7612

[Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek]

zbyszek added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
>  Yes, I'm going to take the lead
>  
Cool, thanks.

>   some CI/CD
>  
What kind of testing?
``

To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7612

[Peter Robinson]

pbrobinson added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
upgrade paths would be a good start, we've had issues in the past where things like
that broke
``

To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7612

[Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek]

zbyszek added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
There is a dependency test in taskotron that runs on all packages (e.g. for latest
fedora-release update:
https://taskotron.fedoraproject.org/artifacts/all/4e634638-6585-11e8-875f...,
example of failure for another package:
https://taskotron.fedoraproject.org/resultsdb/results/22314584). Those results are only
advisory afaik, since gating was disabled, but I'd rather build on this rather than
implement something specific to fedora-release. If you are worried about this, it might be
possible to either enable gating for fedora-release, if possible, or just document that
until gating is restored, anyone making an update should verify that the test is green
before submitting for stable.
``

To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7612

[Peter Robinson]

pbrobinson added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
I mean on a PR in pagure so it's tested before it's even made into a rpm
that's pushed to koji
``

To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7612

[Peter Robinson]

pbrobinson added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
Pull requests for this are filed:

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fedora-release/pull-request/2
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fedora-repos/pull-request/2

Please review, AFAICT the output is the same as the current one.
``

To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7612

[Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek]

zbyszek added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
This is done now. Thanks @pbrobinson.
``

To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7612

[Kevin Fenzi]

The status of the issue: `moving fedora-release entirely to src.fp.o` of project: `releng`
has been updated to: Closed as Fixed by kevin.

https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7612

[Kevin Fenzi]

kevin added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
This was a pagure bug. Closing again since this is done.
``

To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7612

[Kevin Fenzi]

The status of the issue: `moving fedora-release entirely to src.fp.o` of project: `releng`
has been updated to: Closed as Fixed by kevin.

https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7612

[Kevin Fenzi]

kevin added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
This was a pagure bug. Closing again since this is done.
``

To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7612