[pungi-fedora] PR #671: Make x86_64 container base image the only non failable image

[Clement Verna]

cverna opened a new pull-request against the project: `pungi-fedora` that you are
following:
``
 Make x86_64 container base image the only non failable image 
``

To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/671

[Dusty Mabe]

dustymabe commented on the pull-request: ` Make x86_64 container base image the only non
failable image ` that you are following:
``
LGTM
``

To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/671

[Peter Robinson]

pbrobinson commented on the pull-request: ` Make x86_64 container base image the only non
failable image ` that you are following:
``
aarch64 containers are primary too so they should not be failable either so NAK on this 
``

To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/671

[Clement Verna]

cverna commented on the pull-request: ` Make x86_64 container base image the only non
failable image ` that you are following:
``
>  aarch64 containers are primary too so they should not be failable
> either so NAK on this 
>  
Out of curiosity, where can I see what is primary or not ? 
``

To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/671

[Mohan Boddu]

mohanboddu commented on the pull-request: ` Make x86_64 container base image the only non
failable image ` that you are following:
``
@cverna https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures Althought I guess it needs some
updates.
``

To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/671

[Clement Verna]

cverna commented on the pull-request: ` Make x86_64 container base image the only non
failable image ` that you are following:
``
>  @cverna https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures Although I guess
> it needs some updates.
>  
So looking at this armhfp is also primary, which means that we want to fail the compose if
the build fails.
Since this PR was mostly to have a valid compose despite of armhfp failing I guess I can
close these PRs.
``

To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/671

[Clement Verna]

cverna canceled a pull-request against the project: `pungi-fedora` that you are
following.

Cancelled pull-request:

``
 Make x86_64 container base image the only non failable image 
``

https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/671