[pungi-fedora] PR #201: Add eclipse-nls to additional packages

[Lubomír Sedlář]

lsedlar opened a new pull-request against the project: `pungi-fedora` that you are
following:
``
Add eclipse-nls to additional packages
``

To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/201

[Igor Gnatenko]

ignatenkobrain commented on the pull-request: `Add eclipse-nls to additional packages`
that you are following:
``
How does it work with hunspell, hyphen and cetera?
``

To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/201

[Lubomír Sedlář]

lsedlar commented on the pull-request: `Add eclipse-nls to additional packages` that you
are following:
``
Package named `hunspell` etc. is pulled in by something else.
``

To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/201

[Igor Gnatenko]

ignatenkobrain commented on the pull-request: `Add eclipse-nls to additional packages`
that you are following:
``
```
(04:19:58 PM) ignatenkobrain: lsedlar: ^^ why that list actually exists?
(04:20:47 PM) lsedlar: ignatenkobrain, I have no idea
(04:21:43 PM) ignatenkobrain: lsedlar: can we try to drop that list at all? at least all
this l10n/i18n stuff
(04:21:48 PM) ignatenkobrain: because it doesn't make any sense
(04:22:24 PM) lsedlar: ignatenkobrain, again no idea; that would be a question for someone
from release engineering
```

for example, there are things like `gnome-getting-started-docs-*`, `glibc-langpack-*`
which is not included. So I think we should drop this list at all.
``

To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/201

[Igor Gnatenko]

ignatenkobrain commented on the pull-request: `Add eclipse-nls to additional packages`
that you are following:
``
As @lsedlar pointed out on IRC, comps contain `langpacks-*`, but those are not pulling
anything from real l10n stuff.

Langpacks are used through reverse rich weak dependencies (`Supplements` which contain
rich dependency).

Since pungi does `manual depsolving`, those bits are not getting into compose.
``

To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/201

[Lubomír Sedlář]

lsedlar commented on the pull-request: `Add eclipse-nls to additional packages` that you
are following:
``
>  As @lsedlar pointed out on IRC, comps contain langpacks-*, but those
> are not pulling anything from real l10n stuff.
>  
I did not say that (it may or may not be true, I did not check).
``

To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/201

[Igor Gnatenko]

ignatenkobrain commented on the pull-request: `Add eclipse-nls to additional packages`
that you are following:
``
> > As  @lsedlar pointed out on IRC, comps contain langpacks-*, but
> those are not pulling anything from real l10n stuff.
>
>  I did not say that (it may or may not be true, I did not check).
>  
Hmm, then I misunderstood you =(
``

To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/201

[Parag Nemade]

pnemade commented on the pull-request: `Add eclipse-nls to additional packages` that you
are following:
``
I did not understand what exactly is the problem here to create this PR. But if you want
to install eclipse-nls-* packages then you should be already having eclipse-platform
package installed along with the required langpacks-* packages. 
``

To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/201

[Dennis Gilmore]

ausil merged a pull-request against the project: `pungi-fedora` that you are following.

Merged pull-request:

``
Add eclipse-nls to additional packages
``

https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/201