March 2009 - triage - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Bug 240421] Please branch/build syslog-ng for EPEL (EL-5)

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240421 Ray Van Dolson <rayvd(a)bludgeon.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #335459|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #11 from Ray Van Dolson <rayvd(a)bludgeon.org> 2009-03-17 01:03:35 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=335478) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=335478) Patch to be applied on EL4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 240421] Please branch/build syslog-ng for EPEL (EL-5)

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240421 Ray Van Dolson <rayvd(a)bludgeon.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(silfreed@silfreed | |.net) --- Comment #10 from Ray Van Dolson <rayvd(a)bludgeon.org> 2009-03-17 01:01:47 EDT --- http://rayvd.fedorapeople.org/syslog-ng/syslog-ng.spec http://rayvd.fedorapeople.org/syslog-ng/syslog-ng-2.0.10-3.el5.src.rpm The above should build on EL4, EL5 as well as the Fedora's. The complaint about the syslog version is still there. I don't know if this is a big deal to anyone. I also added the new log rotation script as well. Doug, could you take a look when you get a chance? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 240421] Please branch/build syslog-ng for EPEL (EL-5)

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240421 Ray Van Dolson <rayvd(a)bludgeon.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|rvandolson(a)esri.com |rayvd(a)bludgeon.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 240421] Please branch/build syslog-ng for EPEL (EL-5)

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240421 --- Comment #9 from Ray Van Dolson <rayvd(a)bludgeon.org> 2009-03-16 20:03:42 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=335459) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=335459) Patch against configure.in to statically link against libwrap -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 240421] Please branch/build syslog-ng for EPEL (EL-5)

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240421 Ray Van Dolson <rvandolson(a)esri.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rvandolson(a)esri.com --- Comment #8 from Ray Van Dolson <rvandolson(a)esri.com> 2009-03-16 20:01:34 EDT --- Have started some initial work on getting this to compile for EL5 with one .spec file. Patch to configure.in is attached. http://rayvd.fedorapeople.org/syslog-ng/syslog-ng.spec http://rayvd.fedorapeople.org/syslog-ng/syslog-ng-2.0.10-2.el5.src.rpm Some notes: * EL4 issues still need addressed (glib2 needs to be statically linked) * Assuming this is a branch agnostic patch, it should probably be modified to only patch configure.in if we're on EL4 or EL5. * There is an rpmlint complaint about the Provides: syslog-ng.src:44: W: unversioned-explicit-provides syslog rsyslog provides syslog in exactly the same way though. Comments? I'm not sure if this is the cleanest way to do a static patch short of getting upstream to make some changes to the autoconf files before packaging up their tarball. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 346261] halt initscript not responding to halt/poweroff instructions from shutdown

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=346261 Bill Nottingham <notting(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #7 from Bill Nottingham <notting(a)redhat.com> 2009-03-16 13:10:19 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 475227 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 187353] CVE-2006-1390 nethack: Local privilege escalation via crafted score file

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187353 --- Comment #16 from Hans de Goede <hdegoede(a)redhat.com> 2009-03-16 05:46:03 EDT --- As explained in Comment #3, we could still be (indirectly) vulnerable, with that said since clearly no-one seems to have the time to work on this and it is very minor I'm fine with closing it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 182464] dbus-daemon hangs while starting on a system with ldap authorisation enabled.

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=182464 Herbert Gasiorowski <gasi(a)mathematik.uni-marburg.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gasi(a)mathematik.uni-marburg | |.de Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #33 from Herbert Gasiorowski <gasi(a)mathematik.uni-marburg.de> 2009-03-16 05:30:53 EDT --- Seems to exist here on every Fedora 10 system with LDAP too! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 187353] CVE-2006-1390 nethack: Local privilege escalation via crafted score file

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187353 --- Comment #15 from Luke Macken <lmacken(a)redhat.com> 2009-03-15 16:42:19 EDT --- Reply from nethack upstream about this issue, and the potential rumour that it has been fixed upstream. """ > Someone in the Gentoo community mentioned a while back that the > dev team had patched the buffer overflow. We could probably extract the relevant changes, but I don't think that you actually need them. The real security bug is being caused by gentoo's policy of giving users full access to the same group as nethack's setgid setting. They shot themselves in the foot here, by allowing users to modify the score file outside of nethack. The lax buffer handling has been (or will be, from a 3.4.3 perspective...) fixed, but it is not exploitable in a standard installation where nethack runs in a group whose files can't be manipulated by arbitrary users. I assume that redhat/fedora doesn't have the same config issue as gentoo. If I'm wrong, then you should change nethack to run in a distinct group rather than--or in addition to-- patching its score file parsing code. """ +1 for closing this bug :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 245349] Compiz doesn't honor "switch to workspace <n>" keyboard shortcuts

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245349 Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 --- Comment #7 from Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com> 2008-11-25 20:55:41 EDT --- This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping --- Comment #8 from JanS <jan.skowron(a)gmail.com> 2009-03-15 08:44:17 EDT --- Ping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

triage March 2009