June 2008 - triage - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Bug 222448] evolution does't ask for smartcard when there is no or wrong smartcard to sign/crypt mail (pgp)

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: evolution does't ask for smartcard when there is no or wrong smartcard to sign/crypt mail (pgp) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=222448 gtm.kramer(a)inter.nl.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|WONTFIX | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

15 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 440234] PostgreSQL 8.1 and above shows a lot of warnings "nonstandard use of \\ in a string literal at character ..." when using bayes

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: PostgreSQL 8.1 and above shows a lot of warnings "nonstandard use of \\ in a string literal at character ..." when using bayes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440234 ------- Additional Comments From kevin(a)tummy.com 2008-06-27 13:09 EST ------- Can you test the packages from: http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/spamassassin/3.2.5/ and confirm it's fixed? Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

15 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 247069] Initscript Review

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Initscript Review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247069 mcepl(a)redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_DEV |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From mcepl(a)redhat.com 2008-06-27 12:38 EST ------- Just note from your friendly bug triager -- correct status of the bug according to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/BugStatusWorkFlow is ASSIGNED. Please, correct this bug to the right state, if I am wrong. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

15 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 449089] CVE-2008-2544 kernel: mounting proc readonly on a different mount point silently mounts it rw if the /proc mount is rw

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: CVE-2008-2544 kernel: mounting proc readonly on a different mount point silently mounts it rw if the /proc mount is rw Alias: CVE-2008-2544 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449089 poelstra(a)redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-triage- | |list(a)redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

15 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 449089] CVE-2008-2544 kernel: mounting proc readonly on a different mount point silently mounts it rw if the /proc mount is rw

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: CVE-2008-2544 kernel: mounting proc readonly on a different mount point silently mounts it rw if the /proc mount is rw Alias: CVE-2008-2544 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449089 mjc(a)redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |453136 CC| |lwang(a)redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

15 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 445682] Cannot build an i386 version of libpcap on an x64 server

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Cannot build an i386 version of libpcap on an x64 server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445682 mlichvar(a)redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From mlichvar(a)redhat.com 2008-06-27 08:35 EST ------- Fixed in libpcap-0.9.8-3.fc10. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

15 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 253149] fonts-japanese should be renamed to japanese-bitmap-fonts

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: fonts-japanese should be renamed to japanese-bitmap-fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253149 petersen(a)redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|move bitmap fonts to |fonts-japanese should be |separate package |renamed to japanese-bitmap- | |fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

15 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 253149] move bitmap fonts to separate package

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: move bitmap fonts to separate package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253149 ------- Additional Comments From petersen(a)redhat.com 2008-06-27 01:59 EST ------- I am hoping to remove all our fonts-* packages in F10. I think fonts-japanese can be renamed to japanese-bitmap-fonts or something like that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

15 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 205544] Some Japanese words or symbols in Input-pad of SCIM cannot be found in fonts

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Some Japanese words or symbols in Input-pad of SCIM cannot be found in fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=205544 fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |9 petersen(a)redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|tagoh(a)redhat.com |ryo- | |dairiki(a)users.sourceforge.ne | |t Component|fonts-japanese |scim-input-pad QAContact| |extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org Version|9 |rawhide ------- Additional Comments From fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com 2008-05-13 22:20 EST ------- Changing version to '9' as part of upcoming Fedora 9 GA. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping ------- Additional Comments From petersen(a)redhat.com 2008-06-27 01:56 EST ------- > input-pad_2.png > input-pad_3.png > input-pad_4.png These are all covered by wqy fonts. > input-pad_5.png Most of these and some of > input-pad_6.png are covered too. (In reply to comment #6) > I'm not quite sure if all (or some) of them are really categorized into > Japanese. Right - reassigning to scim-input-pad. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

15 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 301821] Incorrect CPU topology parsing

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Incorrect CPU topology parsing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=301821 drepper(a)redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.55-9.fc9 Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Status Whiteboard| bzcl34nup |bzcl34nup ------- Additional Comments From drepper(a)redhat.com 2008-06-27 00:05 EST ------- The patch I provided is in F9. So this bug can be closed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

15 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

triage June 2008