[Bug 268961] elfutils 129 ignores a local symbol within a global
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: elfutils 129 ignores a local symbol within a global
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=268961
dvlasenk(a)redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status Whiteboard| bzcl34nup |bzcl34nup
------- Additional Comments From dvlasenk(a)redhat.com 2008-07-22 11:24 EST -------
nop #0
.globl global_outer
global_outer:
nop #1
.globl global_in_global
global_in_global:
nop #2
.size global_in_global, . - global_in_global
local_in_global:
nop #3
.size local_in_global, . - local_in_global
nop #4
.Lsizeless:
nop #5
.size global_outer, . - global_outer
nop #6
# LD_LIBRARY_PATH=libelf:libdw:backends src/addr2line -S -e testcase2.o 0 1 2 3
4 5 6
(.text)+0
??:0
global_outer
??:0
global_in_global <===== was ist das?
??:0
global_outer+0x2
??:0
global_outer+0x3
??:0
global_outer+0x4
??:0
(.text)+0x6
??:0
It does ignore local_in_global, as Roland intended,
but it picks global_outer and global_in_global inconsistently.
For offset 2, it picked nested global +0, but for offset 3
it selected outer global +2, not nested global +1.
Roland, what should it do in this case? If offset 2 is ok,
are offsets 3,4,5 wrong?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
15 years, 11 months
[Bug 291291] yumex dies after partial update
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: yumex dies after partial update
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=291291
jhutar(a)redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status Whiteboard| bzcl34nup |bzcl34nup
------- Additional Comments From jhutar(a)redhat.com 2008-07-22 10:22 EST -------
Hello,
could you please try to update your yumex? I think this could be already fixed
- see bug 379731 (or maybe even bug 248158?)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
15 years, 11 months
[Bug 129129] RFE: needs firewall hook
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: RFE: needs firewall hook
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=129129
twoerner(a)redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|needs firewall hook |RFE: needs firewall hook
Version|8 |rawhide
------- Additional Comments From twoerner(a)redhat.com 2008-07-22 08:17 EST -------
This is a RFE for rawhide.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
15 years, 11 months
[Bug 229384] Mosml fails to build on x86_64
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Mosml fails to build on x86_64
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229384
kevin(a)tigcc.ticalc.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED
Keywords| |Reopened
Resolution|INSUFFICIENT_DATA |
Status Whiteboard| bzcl34nup |bzcl34nup
------- Additional Comments From kevin(a)tigcc.ticalc.org 2008-07-21 18:41 EST -------
Reopening as this is clearly still current and should show up as such on the
tracker.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
15 years, 11 months