January 2009 - triage - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Bug 418251] Packages in RPM Groups are only shown for level 2

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=418251 Tim Lauridsen <tim.lauridsen(a)googlemail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 418251] Packages in RPM Groups are only shown for level 2

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=418251 Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 --- Comment #7 from Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com> 2008-11-25 21:03:47 EDT --- This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 219922] Internal "USR 3CP5610" modem not detected by "system-config-network"

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=219922 Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 --- Comment #7 from Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com> 2008-11-25 20:51:47 EDT --- This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping --- Comment #8 from Joachim Frieben <jfrieben(a)hotmail.com> 2009-01-13 16:43:59 EDT --- Hardware modem "USR 3CP5610" still not detected for current F10 w/updates but usable after manual selection of device /dev/ttyS2 read off from /var/log/dmesg. Relevant installed packages: - kernel-2.6.28-1.fc10.x86_64 - kudzu-1.2.85-1.x86_64 - system-config-network-1.5.95-1.fc10.noarch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 356771] System changed daylight time on October 28 based on old U.S. rules

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=356771 Petr Machata <pmachata(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #22 from Petr Machata <pmachata(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-13 14:54:33 EDT --- Hmm, so I think I can close this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 356771] System changed daylight time on October 28 based on old U.S. rules

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=356771 --- Comment #21 from Petr Machata <pmachata(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-13 14:52:40 EDT --- Seems to me that America/Chicago is the right zone. It's central time (-6:00) and scheduled to U.S. rules. (For future reference, Monterrey is -6:00 CDT/CST just like Chicago, but is scheduled to Mexico rules.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 238044] /etc/udev/rules.d/90-alsa.rules calls /sbin/salsa without parameter

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=238044 Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor(a)nexgo.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WORKSFORME --- Comment #21 from Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor(a)nexgo.de> 2009-01-13 12:13:16 EDT --- Since I upgraded all the PCs to F10 and the issue does not seem to exist anymore, I close it. pg -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 270381] Ice doesn't support ppc64

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=270381 Mary Ellen Foster <mefoster(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Version|8 |10 Resolution|WONTFIX | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 213135] CVE-2008-2544 mounting proc readonly on a different mount point silently mounts it rw if the /proc mount is rw

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=213135 --- Comment #24 from Martin Cracauer <cracauer(a)cons.org> 2009-01-13 11:28:54 EDT --- (In reply to comment #22) > (In reply to comment #21) > > 2) of course a read-write mounted /chroot/proc will instantly turn security > > into a joke (as all processes, files and devices are accessible by anybody > > becoming root in the chroot). But most of these applications, while requiring > > a /proc, can live with a readonly /proc. > > If anybody in the chroot becomes root, she can escape chroot trivially without > /proc mounted at all. Read-only vs. read-write /proc mount does not influence > that much. > > > I strongly urge somebody who is running a recent Fedora to re-open this bug > > report after confirming which behavior it is showing now. > > Has this been fixed, or is this test incorrect? > > # uname -r > 2.6.27.9-159.fc10.x86_64 > > # mkdir -p /chroot/proc > > # mount -o ro -t proc proc /chroot/proc/ > > # cat /proc/mounts | grep '/proc proc' > /proc /proc proc rw 0 0 > proc /chroot/proc proc ro 0 0 > > # echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward > > # echo 1 > /chroot/proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward > bash: /chroot/proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward: Read-only file system This looks good. I don't have FC anymore. My mainline 2.6.26.3 is still broken: mount -o -ro -t proc proc /mnt/tmp echo 1 > /mnt/tmp/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward # no complaints Any idea whether this is a 2.6.27 or a Redhat/Fedora fix? Thanks Martin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 213135] CVE-2008-2544 mounting proc readonly on a different mount point silently mounts it rw if the /proc mount is rw

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=213135 --- Comment #23 from Tomas Mraz <tmraz(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-13 03:55:10 EDT --- Yes, it seems to be fixed in current kernels. I've tested it with the 2.6.29-0.18.rc0.git9.fc11.x86_64 kernel and it is fixed there too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 213135] CVE-2008-2544 mounting proc readonly on a different mount point silently mounts it rw if the /proc mount is rw

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=213135 --- Comment #22 from Tomas Hoger <thoger(a)redhat.com> 2009-01-13 03:03:00 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21) > 2) of course a read-write mounted /chroot/proc will instantly turn security > into a joke (as all processes, files and devices are accessible by anybody > becoming root in the chroot). But most of these applications, while requiring > a /proc, can live with a readonly /proc. If anybody in the chroot becomes root, she can escape chroot trivially without /proc mounted at all. Read-only vs. read-write /proc mount does not influence that much. > I strongly urge somebody who is running a recent Fedora to re-open this bug > report after confirming which behavior it is showing now. Has this been fixed, or is this test incorrect? # uname -r 2.6.27.9-159.fc10.x86_64 # mkdir -p /chroot/proc # mount -o ro -t proc proc /chroot/proc/ # cat /proc/mounts | grep '/proc proc' /proc /proc proc rw 0 0 proc /chroot/proc proc ro 0 0 # echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward # echo 1 > /chroot/proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward bash: /chroot/proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward: Read-only file system -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

triage January 2009