[Bug 238206] INcorrect resolution/refresh rate dection for Samsung 940n
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=238206
--- Comment #13 from Matej Cepl <mcepl(a)redhat.com> 2009-02-19 04:10:24 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> Yes, you are right -- nouveau is not an officially supported driver yet.
> However, I will leave the last word to the developer -- if you are using
> nouveau now (and I am really really glad it does work for you -- number of
> people for whom nouveau works better than nv seems to be slowly but surely
> rising)
... I am sorry, my firefox crashed and I don't know what I wanted to write here
;-). To make it short, Ben, what to do with this bug?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 4 months
[Bug 238206] INcorrect resolution/refresh rate dection for Samsung 940n
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=238206
Matej Cepl <mcepl(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|ajax(a)redhat.com |bskeggs(a)redhat.com
--- Comment #12 from Matej Cepl <mcepl(a)redhat.com> 2009-02-18 19:03:30 EDT ---
Yes, you are right -- nouveau is not an officially supported driver yet.
However, I will leave the last word to the developer -- if you are using
nouveau now (and I am really really glad it does work for you -- number of
people for whom nouveau works better than nv seems to be slowly but surely
rising)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 4 months
[Bug 245377] Update to 1.2.1??
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245377
Jon Ciesla <limb(a)jcomserv.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED
Resolution| |ERRATA
--- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla <limb(a)jcomserv.net> 2009-02-18 13:25:31 EDT ---
1.2.1 is at stable, and about to be replaced by 1.3.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 4 months
[Bug 238206] INcorrect resolution/refresh rate dection for Samsung 940n
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=238206
--- Comment #11 from Dawid Zamirski <dzrudy(a)gmail.com> 2009-02-17 20:32:16 EDT ---
Hello
The issue seems to be gone with latest nouveau driver (for tested both PC's and
monitors). The "nv" driver is still having this issue though, but it's
irrelevant for me, and I feel that this bug can be closed. I'll keep it open
for now as the bug report was originally opened against "nv" and it's still the
default one in Xorg. If you think otherwise, feel free to close it.
Regards,
Dawid
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 4 months
[Bug 312521] unnecessarily loading raid456
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=312521
Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Version|rawhide |10
Peter Jones <pjones(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED
--- Comment #5 from Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com> 2008-11-25 21:00:07 EDT ---
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10
development cycle.
Changing version to '10'.
More information and reason for this action is here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
--- Comment #6 from Peter Jones <pjones(a)redhat.com> 2009-02-17 15:10:48 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> This module (and it's deps) should only be loaded if they are needed. Attached
> suggested patch.
Applied.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 4 months