September 2009 - triage - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Bug 436632] xorg locks up, no io, usually using firefox

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436632 --- Comment #19 from Matthew Miller <mattdm(a)mattdm.org> 2009-09-29 10:07:01 EDT --- Probably this upstream: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21598 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 436632] xorg locks up, no io, usually using firefox

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436632 Matthew Miller <mattdm(a)mattdm.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mattdm(a)mattdm.org --- Comment #18 from Matthew Miller <mattdm(a)mattdm.org> 2009-09-29 10:01:27 EDT --- Suddenly started happening to me with xorg-x11-drv-ati-6.13.0-0.4.20090908git651fe5a47.fc12.x86_64 on rawhide from 2009.09.29. (--) PCI:*(0:1:0:0) 1002:9583:106b:0083 ATI Technologies Inc M76XT [Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT] rev 0, Mem @ 0xc0000000/268435456, 0xd0620000/65536, I/O @ 0x00003000/256, BIOS @ 0x????????/131072 Xorg takes up 100% of CPU, and if I strace it, I get: ioctl(9, 0xc0086464, 0x7fff168b66a0) = -1 EBUSY (Device or resource busy) ioctl(9, 0xc0086464, 0x7fff168b66a0) = -1 EBUSY (Device or resource busy) ioctl(9, 0xc0086464, 0x7fff168b66a0) = -1 EBUSY (Device or resource busy) ioctl(9, 0xc0086464, 0x7fff168b66a0) = -1 EBUSY (Device or resource busy) ioctl(9, 0xc0086464, 0x7fff168b66a0) = -1 EBUSY (Device or resource busy) ioctl(9, 0xc0086464, 0x7fff168b66a0) = -1 EBUSY (Device or resource busy) ioctl(9, 0xc0086464, 0x7fff168b66a0) = -1 EBUSY (Device or resource busy) ioctl(9, 0xc0086464, 0x7fff168b66a0) = -1 EBUSY (Device or resource busy) ioctl(9, 0xc0086464, 0x7fff168b66a0) = -1 EBUSY (Device or resource busy) ioctl(9, 0xc0086464, 0x7fff168b66a0) = -1 EBUSY (Device or resource busy) ioctl(9, 0xc0086464, 0x7fff168b66a0) = -1 EBUSY (Device or resource busy) ioctl(9, 0xc0086464, 0x7fff168b66a0) = -1 EBUSY (Device or resource busy) over and over very, very quickly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 232921] RFE: drop httpd dependency / add -httpd subpackage

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=232921 Felix Schwarz <felix.schwarz(a)oss.schwarz.eu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |felix.schwarz(a)oss.schwarz.e | |u -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 316131] emacs: use xdg-open for opening URLs by default

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=316131 Daniel Novotny <dnovotny(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #14 from Daniel Novotny <dnovotny(a)redhat.com> 2009-09-24 06:14:04 EDT --- added in emacs-23.1-9.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 244275] Unecessary Requires - shorewall and tcpwrappers

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244275 --- Comment #16 from BJ Dierkes <wdierkes(a)5dollarwhitebox.org> 2009-09-23 13:48:40 EDT --- maxamillion, the maintainer of the EPEL package, said he was intent on following upstream (you/Fedora) and did not want to deviate from the Fedora packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 244275] Unecessary Requires - shorewall and tcpwrappers

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244275 --- Comment #15 from Axel Thimm <axel.thimm(a)atrpms.net> 2009-09-23 13:40:27 EDT --- > Can we please have this issue fixed for the upcoming Fedora 12 release? I thought the bug tended to be "fixed" only for EPEL, or not? And checking the pkgdb it mentions maxamillion as the maintainer. Is this user even in the Cc of this bug to be aware of the issue? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 244275] Unecessary Requires - shorewall and tcpwrappers

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244275 --- Comment #14 from Robert Vogelgesang <vogel(a)folz.de> 2009-09-23 12:21:47 EDT --- Can we please have this issue fixed for the upcoming Fedora 12 release? There are only a few days left until the beta development freeze. I don't really care which one of the proposed patches "wins" in the end. Re: comment #11: If just the "Requires:" for shorewall would be removed, the support for shorewall would still be there, and people using both fail2ban and shorewall will still be happy. But all the other who prefer different firewalling solutions, are not forced to install shorewall. Is there any _real_ reason why such a solution would not be acceptable to anyone? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 316131] emacs: use xdg-open for opening URLs by default

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=316131 Daniel Novotny <dnovotny(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wsr+redhatbugzilla(a)wsrcc.co | |m --- Comment #13 from Daniel Novotny <dnovotny(a)redhat.com> 2009-09-23 11:05:45 EDT --- *** Bug 520966 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 316131] emacs: use xdg-open for opening URLs by default

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=316131 --- Comment #12 from Daniel Novotny <dnovotny(a)redhat.com> 2009-09-23 11:04:04 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=362315) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=362315) a patch can be ported from xemacs without a problem -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 309191] ExcludeArch: ppc64 - can't build - Mono doesn't exist

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=309191 Dan Horák <dan(a)danny.cz> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #7 from Dan Horák <dan(a)danny.cz> 2009-09-23 08:37:34 EDT --- cdcollect rebuilt with ppc64 enabled -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

triage September 2009