Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456393
Summary: RFE: version of pgf in texlive is old Product: Fedora Version: 9 Platform: All URL: http://sourceforge.net/projects/pgf/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: texlive-texmf AssignedTo: jnovy@redhat.com ReportedBy: uckelman@nomic.net QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: andreas.bierfert@lowlatency.de,fedora-triage- list@redhat.com,pertusus@free.fr
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #219146 +++
Description of problem:
Version 1.10 of pgf is packaged with texlive; the current version of pgf (2.0) is two years newer and has far more features.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
texlive-texmf-2007-22.fc9.noarch
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456393
Joel Uckelman uckelman@nomic.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|9 |10
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456393
--- Comment #1 from Joel Uckelman uckelman@nomic.net 2008-12-12 08:52:25 EDT --- This is still a problem in Fedora 10. The version of PGF in texlive-texmf-2007-26.fc10.noarch is 1.10.
There are many, many differences between PGF 1.10 and PGF 2.0. It's frequently not possible to build documents which use PGF 2.0 with PGF 1.10, and it's nontrivial to setup PGF oneself. PGF 1.10 was released in October 2006, and PGF 2.0 is itself nearly 10 months old.
I thought that the point of moving from TeTeX to TeXLive was so that Fedora would have an actively-maintained TeX distribution. Including a two-year-old package when there has been a newer and substantially different version for nearly a year already does not square well with that.
Perhaps PGF needs to be its own package?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456393
--- Comment #2 from Joel Uckelman uckelman@nomic.net 2008-12-12 10:30:57 EDT --- PGF 2.00 is available in TeXLive 2008, so upgrading TeXLive would be one way to solve the immediate problem.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456393
Ben Boeckel mathstuf@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mathstuf@gmail.com
--- Comment #3 from Ben Boeckel mathstuf@gmail.com 2009-01-20 10:53:12 EDT --- *** Bug 475015 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456393
Andrew McNabb amcnabb@mcnabbs.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |amcnabb@mcnabbs.org
--- Comment #4 from Andrew McNabb amcnabb@mcnabbs.org 2009-05-06 14:03:41 EDT --- This is really a duplicate of bug 488651. Being stuck on TeXLive 2007 is extremely frustrating.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456393
--- Comment #5 from Andrew McNabb amcnabb@mcnabbs.org 2009-10-21 14:54:15 EDT --- This should really be closed and marked as a duplicate of bug #488651.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456393
Jindrich Novy jnovy@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #6 from Jindrich Novy jnovy@redhat.com 2009-10-21 14:56:00 EDT --- Marking as duplicate, thanks for heads-up.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 488651 ***
triage@lists.fedoraproject.org