If we can semi-protect ala wikipedia I'm in favor of that. If not,
then let's deal with these as they come. I think that enough of us
have watches on these important pages that we can revert any vandalism
quickly. Let's not over-react to one incident here.
On 1/18/09, Ian Weller <ianweller(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 08:18:45PM -0500, Jon Stanley wrote:
> Not near a computer, someone please revert ASAP.
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: WikiAdmin <webmaster(a)fedoraproject.org>
> Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 00:55:25 +0000 (UTC)
> Subject: FedoraProject page Main Page has been changed by Gtbono
> To: Jstanley <jstanley(a)fedoraproject.org>
>
> Dear Jstanley,
>
>
> The FedoraProject page Main Page has been changed on 00:55, 19 January
> 2009 by
> Gtbono, see
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Main_Page for the current
> version.
>
[snip]
I do want to open this up for discussion: do we require higher
credentials for editing certain pages on the wiki? The FAS account
gtbono was created the same day as these edits.
I'm personally against increasing any more need for being important to
edit certain or all pages on the wiki, but I'd like to know what
everyone else thinks and see if we need to protect pages, or something
else.
--
Ian Weller <ianweller(a)gmail.com>
http://ianweller.org
GnuPG fingerprint: E51E 0517 7A92 70A2 4226 B050 87ED 7C97 EFA8 4A36
"Technology is a word that describes something that doesn't work yet."
~ Douglas Adams
--
Sent from my mobile device
Jon Stanley
Fedora Bug Wrangler
jstanley(a)fedoraproject.org