RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RE: [Fedora-xen] [PATCH 0 of 5] fixlinux-2.6-xen-fedora on ia64

[Zhang, Xiantao]

Very clear now! Thank you very much.
-Xiantao

OTC,Intel Corporation

>  -----Original Message-----
>  From: Akio Takebe [mailto:[e-mail]]
>  Sent: 2006年7月27日 17:36
>  To: Zhang, Xiantao; Aron Griffis; Juan Quintela
>  Cc: Prarit Bhargava; fedora-xen(a)redhat.com; Chris Wright;
>  fedora-ia64-list(a)redhat.com; xen-ia64-devel(a)lists.xensource.com; Akio
>  Takebe
>  Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RE: [Fedora-xen] [PATCH 0 of 5]
>  fixlinux-2.6-xen-fedora on ia64
>  
>  Hi, Xiantao
>  
>  Yes, you are right.
>  And I think you must use the following patch.
>  
>  Now I cannot boot by using xen-ia64-unstable
>  (not linux-2.6-xen-fedora) on FC6.
>  I'm debuging it.
>  Then I'll try to boot by using xen-ia64-unstable/xen and linux-2.6-xen-
>  fedora.
>  
>  diff -r 61b945565398 drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h
>  --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h	Wed Jul 26 17:22:38 2006 +0200
>  +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h	Wed Aug 02 00:30:00 2006 +0900
>  @@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ static inline void tpm_write_index(int b
>  
>   static inline u32 get_chip_buffersize(struct tpm_chip *chip)
>   {
>  -	return chip->vendor->buffersize;
>  +	return chip->vendor.buffersize;
>   }
>  
>   extern void tpm_get_timeouts(struct tpm_chip *);
>  
>  Best Regards,
>  
>  Akio Takebe
>  
>  >Hi Akio,
>  >	Thank you for your information. I am using the CSet34705 which should
>  be
>  >latest, and do you mean I should apply Aron's patches on it. right?  In
>  >addition, what's status about it?
>  >BTW,
>  >
>  >Thanks & Best Regards
>  >-Xiantao
>  >
>  >OTC,Intel Corporation
>  >
>  >> -----Original Message-----
>  >> From: Akio Takebe [mailto:[e-mail]]
>  >> Sent: 2006年7月27日 16:47
>  >> To: Zhang, Xiantao; Aron Griffis; Juan Quintela
>  >> Cc: Prarit Bhargava; fedora-xen(a)redhat.com; Chris Wright;
>  >> fedora-ia64-list(a)redhat.com; xen-ia64-devel(a)lists.xensource.com
>  >> Subject: Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] RE: [Fedora-xen] [PATCH 0 of 5]
>  >> fixlinux-2.6-xen-fedora on ia64
>  >>
>  >> Hi, Xiantao
>  >>
>  >> BZ's patch is old.
>  >> Today 139 cset is added to linux-2.6-xen-fedora tree.
>  >> So I think we should use Aron's patches.
>  >>
>  >> Best Regards,
>  >>
>  >> Akio Takebe
>  >>
>  >> >Hi Aron,
>  >> >	Could you share me the current status for fedora-xen-ia64? Through your
>  
>  >>
>  >> >mails, I see we should focus our efforts on linux-2.6-xen-fedora. But when
>  >> >I applied the patch 199684 on it, conflicts occurs. Do you have any
>  >> >suggestion for contributing to Fedora ?
>  >> >Thanks & Best Regards
>  >> >-Xiantao
>  >> >
>  >> >OTC,Intel Corporation
>  >> >
>  >> >> -----Original Message-----
>  >> >> From: fedora-xen-bounces(a)redhat.com
>  >> [mailto:[e-mail]]
>  >> >> On Behalf Of Aron Griffis
>  >> >> Sent: 2006ト・ヤツ27ネユ 12:11
>  >> >> To: Juan Quintela
>  >> >> Cc: Prarit Bhargava; fedora-xen(a)redhat.com; Chris Wright;
>  >> >> fedora-ia64-list(a)redhat.com; Alex Williamson;
>  >> >> xen-ia64-devel(a)lists.xensource.com
>  >> >> Subject: [Fedora-xen] [PATCH 0 of 5] fix linux-2.6-xen-fedora on ia64
>  >> >>
>  >> >> Hi Juan,
>  >> >>
>  >> >> These patches are the result of Akio, Prarit, Alex and me working on
>  >> >> fixing
>  >> >> the
>  >> >> ia64 build of your tree.  At this point the bare-metal Linux kernel
>  >> >> builds and
>  >> >> boots.  The xen kernel builds but doesn't complete booting.
>  >> >> Nonetheless,
>  >> >> since
>  >> >> these patches seem to take us most of the way there, we'd like to
>  >> >> request
>  >> >>  them
>  >> >> to be applied to your tree.
>  >> >>
>  >> >> Thanks,
>  >> >> Aron
>  >> >
>  >> >_______________________________________________
>  >> >Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
>  >> >Xen-ia64-devel(a)lists.xensource.com
>  >> >http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel