[Fedora-directory-devel] Redux: Please review: Bug 229077: Rename fedora-ds to fedora-ds-base (The package breaks an previous installation of the Fedora DS!!)

[Rich Megginson]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229077
Resolves: bug 229077
Bug Description: Rename fedora-ds to fedora-ds-base (The package breaks
an previous installation of the Fedora DS!!)
Reviewed by: ???
Files: configure.ac and all generated autotool files
Branch: HEAD
Fix Description: As it turns out, only the spec file will have to 
change.  It is ok that we have a package named pkgname-base that uses 
paths like /etc/pkgname and service pkgname.  So this diff has been 
revised to simply bump the version in the code to differentiate it from 
the previously withdrawn fedora-ds in Fedora Extras.
Platforms tested: RHEL4, FC6
Flag Day: No.
Doc impact: No.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/process_bug.cgi#c5

--
Fedora-directory-devel mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-devel

[Andrew Bartlett]

On Fri, 2007-02-23 at 12:28 -0700, Richard Megginson wrote:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229077
> Resolves: bug 229077
> Bug Description: Rename fedora-ds to fedora-ds-base (The package breaks
> an previous installation of the Fedora DS!!)
> Reviewed by: ???
> Files: configure.ac and all generated autotool files
> Branch: HEAD
> Fix Description: As it turns out, only the spec file will have to 
> change.  It is ok that we have a package named pkgname-base that uses 
> paths like /etc/pkgname and service pkgname.  So this diff has been 
> revised to simply bump the version in the code to differentiate it from 
> the previously withdrawn fedora-ds in Fedora Extras.
> Platforms tested: RHEL4, FC6

This seems much more sensible...

Andrew Bartlett