On Tue, 08 Mar 2011 20:09:52 +0200
Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta(a)iki.fi> wrote:
On 03/07/2011 10:37 PM, seth vidal wrote:
>>
>> Anyway, I don't have strong opinions either way, changing it to be the
>> way you suggested (and I discussed in the other mentioned mail) would be
>> a matter of not touching the config files and rewording the related
>> "deprecated" comment in code.
>
> I see - sorry.
> I'd say drop the config file changes and leave the rest and maybe not
> call it deprecated but a supported mode that occasionally creates
> problems
Committed like that.
I'm working on 1.1.10, so I'll pull your changes shortly.
Clark