Michael 回话了,有的看了……
按他的说法被拒的是 GAJ,而由于 Zeitgeist 只被 GAJ 依赖,所以就没被接受。
另外他另一条回贴的说法更有意思:
Anyway, I think coding a peace of software and then trying to figure
out how it fits into GNOME is always a bad thing. The process should
be the other way around: identify a number of issues in GNOME, try to
improve the workflow by designing a better GUI, write the software to
solve the problem.
'always a bad thing ',看来对第三方 gnome 应用程序开发者很打击……
话说当年怎么就 brasero 成为组件了而不是 gnome-baker ?
2010/6/12 Liang Suilong <liangsuilong(a)gmail.com>:
个人觉得他们提到这个是最为关键。
*Our high affiliation with Ubuntu and Canonical*
zeitgeist 看样子是被 GNOME 重写的东西代替了...
2010/6/12 Yu Chen <jcomee(a)gmail.com>
>
>
http://seilo.geekyogre.com/2010/06/my-take-on-zeitgeist-and-gaj-not-being...
>
> <
>
http://seilo.geekyogre.com/2010/06/my-take-on-zeitgeist-and-gaj-not-being...
> >
> 有点气急败坏的样子。
>
>
> --
> Yu
> _______________________________________________
> Chinese mailing list
> Chinese at
lists.fedoraproject.org
>
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/chinese
>
--
Fedora && Debian User, former Ubuntu User
My Page:
http://www.liangsuilong.info
Fedora Project Contributor -- Packager && Ambassador
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Liangsuilong
_______________________________________________
Chinese mailing list
Chinese at
lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/chinese
--
Take a Deep Breath out of Windows