On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 7:24 PM, Robin Lee <robinlee.sysu(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 3:00 AM, Alick Zhao
<alick9188(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Alick Zhao <alick9188(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On 12/21/2013 08:37 PM, Christopher Meng wrote:
> > > Yes, just like Robin said, I think upstream should be willing to
> change.
> > >
> > > Alick if you really want to see it in the official repo, please give
me
> > the
> > > feedback when it's ok.
> > >
> >
> >
> >
https://github.com/briandfoy/Unicode-Tussle/issues/4
> >
> > --
> > Alick
> > Fedora release 19 (Schrödinger’s Cat) user
> >
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Alick
> >
>
>
> 如上述链接中的回复,上游并不愿意重命名命令。
>
> 附注:Debian/Ubuntu 里有个 rename 包,是接受 PCRE 的。不过看起来是 File::Rename
> [1]。Unicode::Tussle 里的按道理来讲对 Unicode 支持要更好。
>
> [1]
https://packages.debian.org/jessie/all/rename/filelist
>
> 下一步怎么行动?
>
要用 alternative 还要先说服 util-linux 的维护者把 rename 作成
alternative。如果这些命令的用法足够兼容,那可以尝试发 issue 到 util-linux[1] 请求一下。
[1]
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/util-linux/bugs
不够兼容诶……
util-linux: rename expression replacement file...
Unicode::Tussle: rename perl_code file...
刚看了一下,Debian 做法是把 util-linux 里的 rename 改名成了 rename.ul [1],Perl 实现是
prename,然后用了 alternatives 机制。所以 Debian 就是发行版自己改的吧?Fedora 能这样吗?
[1]