Could you please have a look at attached diagram briefly describing
potential architecture of the image building service? Would this be a
viable solution?
https://vpavlin.fedorapeople.org/copr-docker.svg
Vaclav
On 24.7.2014 10:42, Václav Pavlín wrote:
On St 23. červenec 2014, 13:33:06 CEST, Richard Marko wrote:
> On 07/23/2014 10:44 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>> On 07/23/2014 01:42 AM, Václav Pavlín wrote:
>>> What do you think? Do you think this makes sense for copr?
>> If we could use COPR to make Beaker packages for Fedora and EPEL *and*
>> upload Dockerfiles to generate Docker images for the various
>> components,
>> that would be seriously cool. On the other hand, it might make more
>> sense as a separate service that reacts to fedmsg events indicating new
>> COPR builds are available.
>>
>
> +1 for separate service.
>
I am not against separate service. The separate service would probably
simply mean running Docker in some cloud instance and call it's API
through docker-python bindings and then collect the results.
Vaclav
--
Lead Infrastructure Engineer
Developer Experience
Brno, Czech Republic
--
Lead Infrastructure Engineer
Developer Experience
Brno, Czech Republic