On 6/25/20 2:04 PM, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> nope ... I can give it a whirl. tho' not clear on what that
tells me, or why
> it might be a 'solution'
That may answer the question if that is Copr problem, package problem or rpm
problem. It looks like RPM problem to some extent to me, so I filled:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1851238
thanks, subscribed.
Speaking of solutions, either don't %undefine the macro at all
(remove the
line), or re-define it to 0.
>>> i'll change it in my spec in any case.
>>
>> Good, just let me know it is OK.
done, in other followup email
Things should work out of box, but googling this problem actually
guided
you to broken use-case, you found a corner case. Let's wait for 1851238
resolution.
+1
o/