On 6/25/20 2:04 PM, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
nope ... I can give it a whirl. tho' not clear on what that tells me, or why it might be a 'solution'
That may answer the question if that is Copr problem, package problem or rpm problem. It looks like RPM problem to some extent to me, so I filled: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1851238
thanks, subscribed.
Speaking of solutions, either don't %undefine the macro at all (remove the line), or re-define it to 0.
i'll change it in my spec in any case.
Good, just let me know it is OK.
done, in other followup email
Things should work out of box, but googling this problem actually guided you to broken use-case, you found a corner case. Let's wait for 1851238 resolution.
+1
o/