Dne 21.9.2016 v 16:59 Pavel Raiskup napsal(a):
Anyway --> is something like that acceptable upstream? I have
patches for
it already (this would require copying branches within existing git
repositories). There is plan B: propose this patches but add options
turning this behavior on/off, whatever default we'll choose.
Patches against what? This originate in fedpkg and fedora dist-git.
Copr-dist-git and copr-fedpkg already has some difference, but I do not want to differ
even more.
Imho this should be discussed with Fedora-infra and maintainer of fedpkg.
While we are on that, could we discuss renaming from 'epel-*'
to
'centos-*'? Because we don't tell the truth entirely if we claim those are
epel-* chroots.
??? Epel chroot does not mean RHEL. It means EPEL, which is "high quality set of
additional packages for Enterprise
Linux, including, but not limited to, Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL), CentOS and
Scientific Linux (SL), Oracle Linux
(OL). "
On the other hand, the name "centos-*" would imply that it is just CentOS,
without additional repos. Which is not true.
It may have sense if we add "centos-*" beside the "epel-*", but there
is no demand for that. And it will likely just
confuse people.
--
Miroslav Suchy, RHCA
Red Hat, Senior Software Engineer, #brno, #devexp, #fedora-buildsys