On Tuesday, October 11, 2016 1:13:55 PM CEST Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Ter, 2016-10-11 at 13:02 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Ter, 2016-10-11 at 08:25 +0200, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> >
> > On Tuesday, October 11, 2016 8:21:15 AM CEST Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Dne 10.10.2016 v 18:45 Sérgio Basto napsal(a):
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Could we have copr for F25 ? and in the future for other
> > > > branched
> > > > repos ? Please .
> > > There is fedora-25-* in Copr for more than month already.
> > I guess I understand; Sérgio asks to have e.g. fedora-25-x86_64
> > repository
> > automatically created from fedora-rawhide-x86_64.
> I'm checking now , yes, none of my project have f25 buildroots
> enabled,
> when f25 was created, projects should (IMHO) inherited same
> configuration of rawhide .
>
> So yes ," Sérgio asks to have e.g. fedora-25-x86_64 repository
> automatically created from fedora-rawhide-x86_64 ".
And checking other projects in copr , all projects that I checked also
don't have f25 buildroots enabled , so maybe it not a bad idea apply
the rule right now .
Thanks, isn't _this_ exactly what the bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381790 is about? Which would mean
(in case we made what Sérgio suggests) _no change_ in rawhide policy is
actually needed in copr?
Thanks for clarification,
Pavel