On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 8:11 AM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On 22. 11. 21 15:00, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> - builds will require a valid Red Hat subscription (the no-cost variant is
> OK as well, though [2])
I cannot help myself but I consider this very unpleasant for EPEL packagers.
Getting and configuring the subscription was always so unfriendly for me that
I've been using EPEL mocks even for my RHEL work. This basically means using
EPEL mocks will once again be as complicated as using RHEL.
However, enough of my personal views. Since we have not used RHEL for copr/mock
EPEL buidlroots until now, but we used a downstream freely-available RHEL-copy
(CentOS Linux), could we not continue doing so by using e.g. AlmaLinux?
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
I'm not aware of a RHEL clone that offers all the architectures that
EPEL does. As far as I can tell, the three most popular (Alma, Rocky,
Oracle) only offer x86_64 and aarch64 but are missing ppc64le and
s390x. That said CentOS Linux 8 doesn't offer s390x either, so we
already have this problem, but switch the EPEL mock chroot to one of
those clones would make the situation worse by also dropping ppc64le.
--
Carl George