Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: ghc-data-default - A class for types with a default value
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737228
Summary: Review Request: ghc-data-default - A class for types
with a default value
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com,
package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Blocks: 648247
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Type: ---
Spec file :
http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-data-default.spec
SRPM file :
http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-data-default-0.3.0-1.fc…
New dependency on ghc-dlist.
rpmlint output:
rpmlint -i ghc-data-default-0.3.0-1.fc14.i686.rpm
ghc-data-default-0.3.0-1.fc14.src.rpm
ghc-data-default-devel-0.3.0-1.fc14.i686.rpm
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: derive - A program and library to derive instances for data types
Alias: ghc-derive
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712270
Summary: Review Request: derive - A program and library to
derive instances for data types
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: unspecified
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com,
fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Spec file : http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/derive.spec
SRPM file :
http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/derive-2.5.2-1.fc14.src.rpm
Koji build : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3122647
rpmlint output:
derive.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell -> Gaskell, Gaitskell,
Skellum
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
derive.i686: W: name-repeated-in-summary C derive
The name of the package is repeated in its summary. This is often redundant
information and looks silly in various programs' output. Make the summary
brief and to the point without including redundant information in it.
derive.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary derive
Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page.
derive.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell -> Gaskell, Gaitskell,
Skellum
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
derive.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary C derive
The name of the package is repeated in its summary. This is often redundant
information and looks silly in various programs' output. Make the summary
brief and to the point without including redundant information in it.
ghc-derive-prof.i686: E: devel-dependency ghc-derive-devel
Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package
itself.
ghc-derive-prof.i686: W: no-documentation
The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include
documentation files.
ghc-derive-prof.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/ghc-7.0.2/derive-2.5.2/libHSderive-2.5.2_p.a
A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If
you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a
development package.
5 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 7 warnings.
Required for yi
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: ghc-ghc-mtl - A mtl compatible with GHC-API monads and monad-transformers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712280
Summary: Review Request: ghc-ghc-mtl - A mtl compatible with
GHC-API monads and monad-transformers
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com,
fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Depends on: 710045
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Spec file : http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-ghc-mtl.spec
SRPM link :
http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-ghc-mtl-1.0.1.0-1.fc14.…
rpmlint output:
ghc-ghc-mtl-prof.i686: E: devel-dependency ghc-ghc-mtl-devel
Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package
itself.
ghc-ghc-mtl-prof.i686: W: no-documentation
The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include
documentation files.
ghc-ghc-mtl-prof.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/ghc-6.12.3/ghc-mtl-1.0.1.0/libHSghc-mtl-1.0.1.0_p.a
A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If
you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a
development package.
4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings.
Required for yi.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: ghc-cautious-file - Provides ways to write a file cautiously
Alias: ghc-cautious-file
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664221
Summary: Review Request: ghc-cautious-file - Provides ways to
write a file cautiously
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com,
fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Blocks: 634048
Classification: Fedora
SPEC file link :
https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-cautious-file.spec?…
SRPM link :
https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-cautious-file-0.1.5…
rpmlint output:
rpmlint -i *.rpm ../ghc-cautious-file.spec
ghc-cautious-file.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US posix -> posit,
pos ix, pos-ix
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-cautious-file.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US posix ->
posit, pos ix, pos-ix
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-cautious-file-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US posix
-> posit, pos ix, pos-ix
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-cautious-file-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-cautious-file-devel
Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package
itself.
ghc-cautious-file-prof.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US posix ->
posit, pos ix, pos-ix
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-cautious-file-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation
The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include
documentation files.
ghc-cautious-file-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/ghc-7.0.1/cautious-file-0.1.5/libHScautious-file-0.1.5_p.a
A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If
you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a
development package.
4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 6 warnings.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: ghc-xdg-basedir - Haskell library implementing XDG base directory spec
Alias: ghc-xdg-basedir
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703503
Summary: Review Request: ghc-xdg-basedir - Haskell library
implementing XDG base directory spec
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: unspecified
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com,
fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Spec file:
http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-xdg-basedir.spec
SRPM link:
http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-xdg-basedir-0.2-1.fc14.…
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: ghc-Diff - A O(ND) diff algorithm in Haskell
Alias: ghc-Diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664151
Summary: Review Request: ghc-Diff - A O(ND) diff algorithm in
Haskell
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com,
fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
SPEC file URL:
https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-Diff.spec?attredire…
SRPM file URL:
https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-Diff-0.1.2-1.fc14.s…
rpmlint output:
rpmlint -i ghc-Diff.spec ghc-Diff*fc15*.rpm
ghc-Diff-prof.i686: E: devel-dependency ghc-Diff-devel
Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package
itself.
ghc-Diff-prof.i686: W: no-documentation
The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include
documentation files.
ghc-Diff-prof.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/ghc-7.0.1/Diff-0.1.2/libHSDiff-0.1.2_p.a
A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If
you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a
development package.
4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: ghc-hint - Library that provides interpreter monad
Alias: ghc-hint
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712284
Summary: Review Request: ghc-hint - Library that provides
interpreter monad
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com,
fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Depends on: 712280
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Spec file : http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-hint.spec
SRPM file :
http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-hint-0.3.3.2-1.fc14.src…
rpmlint output:
ghc-hint-prof.i686: E: devel-dependency ghc-hint-devel
Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package
itself.
ghc-hint-prof.i686: W: no-documentation
The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include
documentation files.
ghc-hint-prof.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/ghc-6.12.3/hint-0.3.3.2/libHShint-0.3.3.2_p.a
A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If
you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a
development package.
4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings.
Required for yi.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: ghc-dlist - Haskell package that provides difference lists
Alias: ghc-dlist
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664205
Summary: Review Request: ghc-dlist - Haskell package that
provides difference lists
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com,
fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Blocks: 634048
Classification: Fedora
SRPM link :
https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-dlist-0.5-1.fc14.sr…
SPEC file link :
https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-dlist.spec?attredir…
rpmlint output:
rpmlint -i *.rpm ../ghc-dlist.spec
ghc-dlist-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-dlist-devel
Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package
itself.
ghc-dlist-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation
The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include
documentation files.
ghc-dlist-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/ghc-7.0.1/dlist-0.5/libHSdlist-0.5_p.a
A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If
you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a
development package.
4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: build darcs for EPEL-6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639787
Summary: build darcs for EPEL-6
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: darcs
AssignedTo: jeremy(a)hinegardner.org
ReportedBy: petersen(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, jeremy(a)hinegardner.org,
fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Description of problem:
SSIA: I think we should have darcs in EPEL-6.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request : yi - An extensible text editor written in Haskell
Alias: yi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712659
Summary: Review Request : yi - An extensible text editor
written in Haskell
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: unspecified
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com,
fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Depends on: 630221,630302,662273,664150,664151,664208,664221,70315
2,703502,704113,712270,712272,712273,712284,712404
Blocks: 634048
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
SRPM file :
http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/yi-0.6.3.0-1.fc14.src.rpm
Spec file : http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/yi.spec
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: %{ghc_version} desn't expand properly
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547867
Summary: %{ghc_version} desn't expand properly
Product: Fedora
Version: 11
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: high
Component: ghc-rpm-macros
AssignedTo: loupgaroublond(a)gmail.com
ReportedBy: jochen(a)herr-schmitt.de
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, loupgaroublond(a)gmail.com,
fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
I want to tryout ghc-6.12.1 on my system and have installed
ghc-rpm-macros-0.3.0-1 on my system.
Because I have trouble to compile my packages, I have try out the following
command:
$ rpm -q --eval '%{ghc_version}'
and got the following output:
error: Recursion depth(17) greater than max(16)
15< (empty)
14< (empty)
13< (empty)
12< (empty)
11< (empty)
10< (empty)
9< (empty)
8< (empty)
7< (empty)
6< (empty)
5< (empty)
4< (empty)
3< (empty)
2< (empty)
1< (empty)
0< (empty)
If I type
$ ghc --numeric-version
I will get
6.12.1
which I expected for
$ rpm -q --eval '%{ghc_version}'
Best Regards:
Jochen Schmitt
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request : ghc-data-accessor-template - A library for accessing and manipulating fields of records
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712404
Summary: Review Request : ghc-data-accessor-template - A
library for accessing and manipulating fields of
records
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com,
fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Depends on: 662272
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
SPEC file :
http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-data-accessor-template.…
SRPM file :
http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-data-accessor-template-…
rpmlint output:
ghc-data-accessor-template-prof.i686: E: devel-dependency
ghc-data-accessor-template-devel
Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package
itself.
ghc-data-accessor-template-prof.i686: W: no-documentation
The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include
documentation files.
ghc-data-accessor-template-prof.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/ghc-6.12.3/data-accessor-template-0.2.1.7/libHSdata-accessor-template-0.2.1.7_p.a
A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If
you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a
development package.
4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: ghc-pointedlist - A zipper-like comonad
Alias: ghc-pointedlist
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712273
Summary: Review Request: ghc-pointedlist - A zipper-like
comonad
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com,
fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Depends on: 712270,712271
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Spec file :
http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-pointedlist.spec
SRPM file :
http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-pointedlist-0.4.0.2-1.f…
rpmlint output:
ghc-pointedlist.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) comonad -> co monad,
co-monad, commonage
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-pointedlist.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US comonad -> co
monad, co-monad, commonage
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-pointedlist.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) comonad -> co monad,
co-monad, commonage
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-pointedlist.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US comonad -> co
monad, co-monad, commonage
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-pointedlist-devel.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) comonad -> co
monad, co-monad, commonage
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-pointedlist-devel.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US comonad ->
co monad, co-monad, commonage
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-pointedlist-prof.i686: E: devel-dependency ghc-pointedlist-devel
Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package
itself.
ghc-pointedlist-prof.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) comonad -> co
monad, co-monad, commonage
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-pointedlist-prof.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US comonad ->
co monad, co-monad, commonage
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-pointedlist-prof.i686: W: no-documentation
The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include
documentation files.
ghc-pointedlist-prof.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/ghc-6.12.3/pointedlist-0.4.0.2/libHSpointedlist-0.4.0.2_p.a
A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If
you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a
development package.
4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 10 warnings.
Required for yi.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: ghc-recaptcha - A Haskell library to use reCAPTCHA service
Alias: ghc-recaptcha
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=655486
Summary: Review Request: ghc-recaptcha - A Haskell library to
use reCAPTCHA service
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com,
fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
SPEC URL :
https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-recaptcha.spec?attr…
SRPM URL:
https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-recaptcha-0.1-1.fc1…
rpmlint output:
rpmlint -i ghc-recaptcha-0.1-1.fc14.x86_64.rpm
ghc-recaptcha-devel-0.1-1.fc14.x86_64.rpm
ghc-recaptcha-prof-0.1-1.fc14.x86_64.rpm
../../SRPMS/ghc-recaptcha-0.1-1.fc14.src.rpm ghc-recaptcha.spec
ghc-recaptcha.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US hs -> HS, sh, gs
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-recaptcha-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US hs -> HS,
sh, gs
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-recaptcha-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-recaptcha-devel
Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package
itself.
ghc-recaptcha-prof.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US hs -> HS,
sh, gs
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-recaptcha-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation
The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include
documentation files.
ghc-recaptcha-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/ghc-6.12.3/recaptcha-0.1/libHSrecaptcha-0.1_p.a
A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If
you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a
development package.
ghc-recaptcha.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US hs -> HS, sh, gs
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 6 warnings.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: build feldspar-language-0.4 for ghc7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=713359
Summary: build feldspar-language-0.4 for ghc7
Product: Fedora
Version: 15
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Component: ghc-feldspar-language
AssignedTo: shakthimaan(a)gmail.com
ReportedBy: petersen(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com, shakthimaan(a)gmail.com
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Description of problem:
feldspar-language was blocked from f15 since 0.3 didn't build with ghc7.
0.4 is now available which builds, though it requires a couple of new
dependencies. Opening this bug to track.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: ghc-fingertree - Haskell package provides generic finger-tree structure
Alias: ghc-fingertree
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664208
Summary: Review Request: ghc-fingertree - Haskell package
provides generic finger-tree structure
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com,
fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Blocks: 634048
Classification: Fedora
SRPM link:
https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-fingertree-0.0.1.0-…
SPEC file link:
https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-fingertree.spec?att…
rpmlint output:
rpmlint -i *.rpm ../ghc-fingertree.spec
ghc-fingertree-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-fingertree-devel
Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package
itself.
ghc-fingertree-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation
The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include
documentation files.
ghc-fingertree-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/ghc-7.0.1/fingertree-0.0.1.0/libHSfingertree-0.0.1.0_p.a
A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If
you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a
development package.
4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: ghc-fclabels - A package that provides first class accessor labels
Alias: ghc-fclabels
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712271
Summary: Review Request: ghc-fclabels - A package that provides
first class accessor labels
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com,
fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Spec file : http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-fclabels.spec
SRPM file :
http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-fclabels-0.11.1.1-1.fc1…
Koji build : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3122646
rpmlint output:
ghc-fclabels.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) accessor -> accessory,
access or, access-or
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-fclabels.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US composable -> com
posable, com-posable, compo sable
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-fclabels.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) accessor -> accessory,
access or, access-or
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-fclabels.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US composable -> com
posable, com-posable, compo sable
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-fclabels-devel.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) accessor ->
accessory, access or, access-or
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-fclabels-devel.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US composable ->
com posable, com-posable, compo sable
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-fclabels-prof.i686: E: devel-dependency ghc-fclabels-devel
Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package
itself.
ghc-fclabels-prof.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) accessor -> accessory,
access or, access-or
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-fclabels-prof.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US composable ->
com posable, com-posable, compo sable
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-fclabels-prof.i686: W: no-documentation
The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include
documentation files.
ghc-fclabels-prof.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/ghc-7.0.2/fclabels-0.11.1.1/libHSfclabels-0.11.1.1_p.a
A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If
you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a
development package.
4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 10 warnings.
Required for yi.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: ghc-monads-tf - A library to provide Monad classes using type families
Alias: ghc-monads-tf
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=660645
Summary: Review Request: ghc-monads-tf - A library to provide
Monad classes using type families
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com,
fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Blocks: 634048
Classification: Fedora
SPEC file URL :
https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-monads-tf.spec?attr…
SRPM URL :
https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-monads-tf-0.1.0.0-1…
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: support volume plugin via alsa-mixer?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=715482
Summary: support volume plugin via alsa-mixer?
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Component: xmobar
AssignedTo: mathstuf(a)gmail.com
ReportedBy: petersen(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: mathstuf(a)gmail.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Description of problem:
xmobar-0.13 seems to support display the volume level using alsa-mixer:
I haven't actually tested it yet...
This is just a rfe to consider adding that support to the fedora package.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: xmonad GNOME session fails to start properly
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707569
Summary: xmonad GNOME session fails to start properly
Product: Fedora
Version: 15
Platform: x86_64
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: high
Priority: unspecified
Component: xmonad
AssignedTo: mathstuf(a)gmail.com
ReportedBy: conan(a)irconan.co.uk
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, mathstuf(a)gmail.com,
fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Description of problem:
Using the xmonad GNOME session using default configuration of Fedora 15 fails
to start up.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
0.9.2-7.fc15.x86_64
How reproducible:
Always occurs.
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install xmonad
2. Log out
3. Log in using "xmonad GNOME" session
Actual results:
Window saying "Oh no!" appears with a button to logout.
Expected results:
GNOME starts up using xmonad as the window manager
Additional info:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: ghc-data-accessor-monads-fd - A package to access state in monads-fd State Monad
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664155
Summary: Review Request: ghc-data-accessor-monads-fd - A
package to access state in monads-fd State Monad
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com,
fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
SRPM URL :
https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-data-accessor-monad…
SPEC file URL :
https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-data-accessor-monad…
rpmlint output:
rpmlint -i ghc-data-accessor-monads-fd*.rpm ghc-data-accessor-monads-fd.spec
ghc-data-accessor-monads-fd-prof.i686: E: devel-dependency
ghc-data-accessor-monads-fd-devel
Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package
itself.
ghc-data-accessor-monads-fd-prof.i686: W: no-documentation
The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include
documentation files.
ghc-data-accessor-monads-fd-prof.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/ghc-6.12.3/data-accessor-monads-fd-0.2.0.2/libHSdata-accessor-monads-fd-0.2.0.2_p.a
A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If
you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a
development package.
4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: ghc-data-binary-ieee754- Haskell parser/serialiser library for IEEE754 floating point values
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=660656
Summary: Review Request: ghc-data-binary-ieee754- Haskell
parser/serialiser library for IEEE754 floating point
values
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com,
fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Blocks: 634048
Classification: Fedora
SPEC file URL :
https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-data-binary-ieee754…
SRPM URL :
https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-data-binary-ieee754…
rpmlint output:
pmlint -i ghc-data-binary-ieee754*.rpm ghc-data-binary-ieee754.spec
ghc-data-binary-ieee754.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell ->
Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-data-binary-ieee754.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) serialiser ->
serialist, serialism, serialize
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-data-binary-ieee754.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell ->
Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-data-binary-ieee754.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) serialiser ->
serialist, serialism, serialize
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-data-binary-ieee754-devel.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell ->
Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-data-binary-ieee754-devel.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) serialiser
-> serialist, serialism, serialize
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-data-binary-ieee754-prof.i686: E: devel-dependency
ghc-data-binary-ieee754-devel
Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package
itself.
ghc-data-binary-ieee754-prof.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) serialiser
-> serialist, serialism, serialize
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-data-binary-ieee754-prof.i686: W: no-documentation
The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include
documentation files.
ghc-data-binary-ieee754-prof.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/ghc-6.12.3/data-binary-ieee754-0.4.2.1/libHSdata-binary-ieee754-0.4.2.1_p.a
A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If
you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a
development package.
4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 9 warnings.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: ghc-bloomfilter - A fast, space efficient Bloom filter implementation
Alias: ghc-bloomfilter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670007
Summary: Review Request: ghc-bloomfilter - A fast, space
efficient Bloom filter implementation
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com,
fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
SPEC file URL : http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/ghc-bloomfilter.spec
SRPM URL :
http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/ghc-bloomfilter-1.2.6.7-1.f13.src.rpm
rpmlint output:
rpmlint -i ghc-bloomfilter-*fc14*.rpm ../ghc-bloomfilter.spec
ghc-bloomfilter-prof.i686: E: devel-dependency ghc-bloomfilter-devel
Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package
itself.
ghc-bloomfilter-prof.i686: W: no-documentation
The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include
documentation files.
ghc-bloomfilter-prof.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/ghc-6.12.3/bloomfilter-1.2.6.7/libHSbloomfilter-1.2.6.7_p.a
A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If
you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a
development package.
4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: leksah-server doesn't need to require haddock
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=722689
Summary: leksah-server doesn't need to require haddock
Product: Fedora
Version: 15
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Component: leksah-server
AssignedTo: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com
ReportedBy: petersen(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com,
lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Description of problem:
ghc7 already provides new enough haddock so I don't
think the leksah-server binary needs to require haddock
explicitly (or perhaps it should require ghc instead?)
Not sure if F14 leksah-server may need Requires haddock
since the haddock version of haddock in ghc6 is older
than that required for building leksah-server?
Steps to Reproduce:
1. yum install leksah-server
Actual results:
pull in haddock
Expected results:
just to use the haddock in ghc.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: ghc-executable-path - Haskell library to find full path of an executable
Alias: ghc-executable-path
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703502
Summary: Review Request: ghc-executable-path - Haskell library
to find full path of an executable
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: unspecified
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com,
fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Spec file :
http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-executable-path.spec
SRPM link :
http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-executable-path-0.0.2-1…
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: ghc-gconf - Binding to the GNOME configuration database system
Alias: ghc-gconf
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664214
Summary: Review Request: ghc-gconf - Binding to the GNOME
configuration database system
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com,
fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Blocks: 634048
Classification: Fedora
SRPM link :
https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-gconf-0.11.1-1.fc14…
SPEC file link :
https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-gconf.spec?attredir…
rpmlint output:
rpmlint -i *.rpm ghc-gconf.spec
ghc-gconf-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-gconf-devel
Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package
itself.
ghc-gconf-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation
The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include
documentation files.
ghc-gconf-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/ghc-6.12.3/gconf-0.11.1/libHSgconf-0.11.1_p.a
A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If
you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a
development package.
4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings.
Will upgrade to 0.12.0 for >f15
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: ghc-rosezipper - Generic zipper implementation for Haskell
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703152
Summary: Review Request: ghc-rosezipper - Generic zipper
implementation for Haskell
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com,
fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
This package is required for yi (a text editor).
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: ghc-cmdargs-0.8 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730542
Summary: ghc-cmdargs-0.8 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Component: ghc-cmdargs
AssignedTo: mathstuf(a)gmail.com
ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: mathstuf(a)gmail.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Type: ---
Latest upstream release: 0.8
Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.7
URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/cmdargs/
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: ghc-6.12.3 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=604592
Summary: ghc-6.12.3 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: ASSIGNED
Keywords: FutureFeature
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: ghc
AssignedTo: petersen(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, bos(a)serpentine.com,
loupgaroublond(a)gmail.com,
fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Latest upstream release: 6.12.3
Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 6.12.2
URL: http://haskell.org/ghc/
Please consult the package update guidelines before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_update_guidelines
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_Release_Monitoring
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: darcs-2.5.2 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=684730
Summary: darcs-2.5.2 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Component: darcs
AssignedTo: jeremy(a)hinegardner.org
ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, jeremy(a)hinegardner.org,
fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Latest upstream release: 2.5.2
Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 2.5.1
URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/darcs/
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: ghc-7.0.4 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=713705
Summary: ghc-7.0.4 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Component: ghc
AssignedTo: petersen(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, bos(a)serpentine.com,
fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Latest upstream release: 7.0.4
Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 7.0.2
URL: http://haskell.org/ghc/
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: ghc-monads-fd - Monad classes, using functional dependencies
Alias: ghc-monads-fd
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664150
Summary: Review Request: ghc-monads-fd - Monad classes, using
functional dependencies
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com,
fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
SRPM URL :
https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-monads-fd-0.1.0.4-1…
SPEC file URL :
https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-monads-fd.spec?attr…
rpmlint output
rpmlint -i ghc-monads-fd*fc15*.rpm ghc-monads-fd.spec
ghc-monads-fd.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US http -> HTTP
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-monads-fd.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cecs -> ceca, cess,
secs
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-monads-fd.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pdx -> pd, pix, pax
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-monads-fd.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US edu -> ed, educ,
due
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-monads-fd.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mpj -> mph, mp, mpg
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-monads-fd.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US springschool ->
spring school, spring-school, Springsteen
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-monads-fd.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US html -> HTML, ht
ml, ht-ml
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-monads-fd.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mtl -> mt, ml, mel
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-monads-fd.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US http -> HTTP
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-monads-fd.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cecs -> ceca, cess,
secs
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-monads-fd.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pdx -> pd, pix, pax
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-monads-fd.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US edu -> ed, educ, due
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-monads-fd.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mpj -> mph, mp, mpg
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-monads-fd.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US springschool ->
spring school, spring-school, Springsteen
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-monads-fd.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US html -> HTML, ht ml,
ht-ml
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-monads-fd.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mtl -> mt, ml, mel
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-monads-fd-devel.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US http -> HTTP
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-monads-fd-devel.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cecs -> ceca,
cess, secs
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-monads-fd-devel.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pdx -> pd,
pix, pax
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-monads-fd-devel.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US edu -> ed,
educ, due
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-monads-fd-devel.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mpj -> mph,
mp, mpg
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-monads-fd-devel.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US springschool
-> spring school, spring-school, Springsteen
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-monads-fd-devel.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mtl -> mt,
ml, mel
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-monads-fd-prof.i686: E: devel-dependency ghc-monads-fd-devel
Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package
itself.
ghc-monads-fd-prof.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US http -> HTTP
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-monads-fd-prof.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cecs -> ceca,
cess, secs
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-monads-fd-prof.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pdx -> pd,
pix, pax
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-monads-fd-prof.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US edu -> ed,
educ, due
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-monads-fd-prof.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mpj -> mph,
mp, mpg
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-monads-fd-prof.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US springschool
-> spring school, spring-school, Springsteen
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-monads-fd-prof.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US html -> HTML,
ht ml, ht-ml
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-monads-fd-prof.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mtl -> mt, ml,
mel
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-monads-fd-prof.i686: W: no-documentation
The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include
documentation files.
ghc-monads-fd-prof.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/ghc-7.0.1/monads-fd-0.1.0.4/libHSmonads-fd-0.1.0.4_p.a
A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If
you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a
development package.
4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 33 warnings.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: ghc-json-0.5 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739874
Summary: ghc-json-0.5 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Component: ghc-json
AssignedTo: petersen(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Type: ---
Latest upstream release: 0.5
Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.4.4
URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/json/
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: ghc-7.2.1 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730259
Summary: ghc-7.2.1 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Component: ghc
AssignedTo: petersen(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, bos(a)serpentine.com,
fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Type: ---
Latest upstream release: 7.2.1
Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 7.0.4
URL: http://haskell.org/ghc/
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: ghc-libmpd-0.6.0 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693067
Summary: ghc-libmpd-0.6.0 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Component: ghc-libmpd
AssignedTo: mathstuf(a)gmail.com
ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: mathstuf(a)gmail.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Latest upstream release: 0.6.0
Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.5.0
URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/libmpd/
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: ghc-tagsoup-0.12.3 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730262
Summary: ghc-tagsoup-0.12.3 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Component: ghc-tagsoup
AssignedTo: mathstuf(a)gmail.com
ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: mathstuf(a)gmail.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Type: ---
Latest upstream release: 0.12.3
Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.12.2
URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/tagsoup/
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: ghc-utf8-string-0.3.7 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=733626
Summary: ghc-utf8-string-0.3.7 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Component: ghc-utf8-string
AssignedTo: petersen(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Type: ---
Latest upstream release: 0.3.7
Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.3.6
URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/utf8-string/
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: ghc-split-0.1.4.1 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728182
Summary: ghc-split-0.1.4.1 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Component: ghc-split
AssignedTo: mathstuf(a)gmail.com
ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: mathstuf(a)gmail.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Type: ---
Latest upstream release: 0.1.4.1
Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.1.3
URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/split/
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: ghc-enumerator-0.4.14 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732682
Summary: ghc-enumerator-0.4.14 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Component: ghc-enumerator
AssignedTo: mathstuf(a)gmail.com
ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: mathstuf(a)gmail.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Type: ---
Latest upstream release: 0.4.14
Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.4.13.1
URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/enumerator/
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: ghc-attoparsec-0.9.1.2 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732401
Summary: ghc-attoparsec-0.9.1.2 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Component: ghc-attoparsec
AssignedTo: mathstuf(a)gmail.com
ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: mathstuf(a)gmail.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Type: ---
Latest upstream release: 0.9.1.2
Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.9.1.1
URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/attoparsec/
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: ghc-ranges-0.2.4 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735055
Summary: ghc-ranges-0.2.4 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Component: ghc-ranges
AssignedTo: mathstuf(a)gmail.com
ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: mathstuf(a)gmail.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Type: ---
Latest upstream release: 0.2.4
Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.2.3
URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/ranges/
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: ghc-bytestring-nums-0.3.3 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728766
Summary: ghc-bytestring-nums-0.3.3 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Component: ghc-bytestring-nums
AssignedTo: mathstuf(a)gmail.com
ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: mathstuf(a)gmail.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Type: ---
Latest upstream release: 0.3.3
Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.3.2
URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/bytestring-nums/
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: ghc-base64-bytestring-0.1.0.3 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728765
Summary: ghc-base64-bytestring-0.1.0.3 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Component: ghc-base64-bytestring
AssignedTo: mathstuf(a)gmail.com
ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: mathstuf(a)gmail.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Type: ---
Latest upstream release: 0.1.0.3
Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.1.0.2
URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/base64-bytestring/
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: ghc-MemoTrie-0.4.10 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=694423
Summary: ghc-MemoTrie-0.4.10 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Component: ghc-MemoTrie
AssignedTo: mathstuf(a)gmail.com
ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: mathstuf(a)gmail.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Latest upstream release: 0.4.10
Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.4.9
URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/MemoTrie/
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: ghc-xml-1.3.10 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=740513
Summary: ghc-xml-1.3.10 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Component: ghc-xml
AssignedTo: mathstuf(a)gmail.com
ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, mathstuf(a)gmail.com,
fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Type: ---
Latest upstream release: 1.3.10
Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 1.3.9
URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/xml/
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Needs ghc dependency?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716676
Summary: Needs ghc dependency?
Product: Fedora
Version: 14
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Component: cabal2spec
AssignedTo: petersen(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: bloch(a)verdurin.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Description of problem:
I just installed cabal2spec to help with packaging Bustle. However, when I ran
it, there was an error as it couldn't find ghc. Perhaps that should be added
as a dependency?
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
cabal2spec-0.22.7-1.fc14.noarch
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: "xmonad --recompile" reports missing libX11.so library in Fedora 15 x86_64
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=723558
Summary: "xmonad --recompile" reports missing libX11.so library
in Fedora 15 x86_64
Product: Fedora
Version: 15
Platform: x86_64
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: unspecified
Component: xmonad
AssignedTo: mathstuf(a)gmail.com
ReportedBy: avendael(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, mathstuf(a)gmail.com,
fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Description of problem:
xmonad --recompile reports missing libX11.so library when the command is
invoked on an x64 system. This is because libX11.x86_64 is not installed as a
dependency when xmonad.x86_64 is installed through yum. Installing
libX11.x86_64 fixes the problem.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Name : xmonad
Arch : x86_64
Version : 0.9.2
Release : 8.fc15
How reproducible: always (100%)
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install the x86_64 versions of xmonad, ghc-xmonad-contrib,
ghc-xmonad-contrib-devel, and xmonad-gnome
2. Create a minimal xmonad config in ~/.xmonad/xmonad.hs
3. Invoke `xmonad --recompile` in a terminal
Actual results:
`xmonad --recompile` fails with linking errors due to a missing libX11.so
Expected results:
libX11.x86_64 should be pulled as a dependency when xmonad.x86_64 is installed
to prevent the linking problem when `xmonad --recompile` is invoked.
Additional info:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: ghc-neither-0.2.0 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=662481
Summary: ghc-neither-0.2.0 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: ASSIGNED
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: ghc-neither
AssignedTo: mathstuf(a)gmail.com
ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: mathstuf(a)gmail.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Latest upstream release: 0.2.0
Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.1.0
URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/neither/
Please consult the package update guidelines before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_update_guidelines
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: ghc-attoparsec-0.8.5.1 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693066
Summary: ghc-attoparsec-0.8.5.1 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Component: ghc-attoparsec
AssignedTo: mathstuf(a)gmail.com
ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: mathstuf(a)gmail.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Latest upstream release: 0.8.5.1
Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.8.5.0
URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/attoparsec/
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: ghc-hamlet-0.10.0 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734408
Summary: ghc-hamlet-0.10.0 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Component: ghc-hamlet
AssignedTo: mathstuf(a)gmail.com
ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: mathstuf(a)gmail.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Type: ---
Latest upstream release: 0.10.0
Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.9.0
URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/hamlet/
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: ghc-neither-0.3.0 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=740996
Summary: ghc-neither-0.3.0 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Component: ghc-neither
AssignedTo: mathstuf(a)gmail.com
ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: mathstuf(a)gmail.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Type: ---
Latest upstream release: 0.3.0
Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.1.0
URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/neither/
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: broken obsoletes/provides in ghc-7.0.2-16.4.fc15
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742407
Summary: broken obsoletes/provides in ghc-7.0.2-16.4.fc15
Product: Fedora
Version: 15
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Component: ghc
AssignedTo: petersen(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: henrik(a)henriknordstrom.net
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, bos(a)serpentine.com,
fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Type: ---
Upgrade path is broken in 7.0.2-16.4 with incorrect Obsoletes/Provides version
for ghc-ghc-prof.
$ rpm -q --obsoletes -p ghc-ghc-devel-7.0.2-16.4.fc15.armv7hl.rpm
ghc-bin-package-db-devel < 0.0.0.0-12
ghc-bin-package-db-doc < 0.0.0.0-12
ghc-ghc-doc < 1.2.0.0-16.4.fc15
ghc-ghc-prof < 1.2.0.0-16.4.fc15
$ rpm -q --provides -p ghc-ghc-devel-7.0.2-16.4.fc15.armv7hl.rpm
ghc-ghc-doc = 1.2.0.0-16.4.fc15
ghc-ghc-prof = 1.2.0.0-16.4.fc15
ghc-devel(bin-package-db-0.0.0.0) = e86c581904632f5084612b2c44e864c2
ghc-prof(bin-package-db-0.0.0.0) = e86c581904632f5084612b2c44e864c2
ghc-devel(ghc-7.0.2) = 253ed4ef7b87a1028456cdca91abec62
ghc-prof(ghc-7.0.2) = 253ed4ef7b87a1028456cdca91abec62
ghc-devel(ghc-binary-0.5.0.2) = e9978006ac26c33e0a436ac790faffe0
ghc-prof(ghc-binary-0.5.0.2) = e9978006ac26c33e0a436ac790faffe0
ghc-ghc-devel = 7.0.2-16.4.fc15
ghc-ghc-devel(armv7hl-32) = 7.0.2-16.4.fc15
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: ghc-zlib-bindings-0.0.1 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=733627
Summary: ghc-zlib-bindings-0.0.1 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Component: ghc-zlib-bindings
AssignedTo: mathstuf(a)gmail.com
ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: mathstuf(a)gmail.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Type: ---
Latest upstream release: 0.0.1
Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.0.0
URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/zlib-bindings/
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: hlint-1.8.14 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730468
Summary: hlint-1.8.14 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Component: hlint
AssignedTo: konrad(a)tylerc.org
ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: konrad(a)tylerc.org, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Type: ---
Latest upstream release: 1.8.14
Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 1.8.13
URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/hlint/
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: ghc-uniplate-1.6.1 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730264
Summary: ghc-uniplate-1.6.1 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Component: ghc-uniplate
AssignedTo: konrad(a)tylerc.org
ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: konrad(a)tylerc.org, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Type: ---
Latest upstream release: 1.6.1
Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 1.6
URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/uniplate/
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: cpphs-1.13 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=741218
Summary: cpphs-1.13 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Component: cpphs
AssignedTo: konrad(a)tylerc.org
ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: konrad(a)tylerc.org, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Type: ---
Latest upstream release: 1.13
Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 1.12
URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/cpphs/
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: ghc armv7hl arch support
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=741725
Summary: ghc armv7hl arch support
Product: Fedora
Version: 15
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Component: ghc
AssignedTo: petersen(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: henrik(a)henriknordstrom.net
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, bos(a)serpentine.com,
fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Type: ---
Created attachment 525189
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=525189
Enable armv7hl arch in ghc.spec
ghc have been bootstrapped on armv7hl Fedora 15. The attached changes enables
the armv7hl architecture in ghc.spec
Note, this touches the logic on selection of registerised builds a bit. I have
verified build.mk still gets correctly set on x86_64 but have not verified a
full x86_64 build or i386.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: cabal-dev-0.9 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=741095
Summary: cabal-dev-0.9 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Component: cabal-dev
AssignedTo: petersen(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Type: ---
Latest upstream release: 0.9
Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.8
URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/cabal-dev/
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: ghc-case-insensitive-0.3.0.1 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731971
Summary: ghc-case-insensitive-0.3.0.1 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Component: ghc-case-insensitive
AssignedTo: petersen(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Type: ---
Latest upstream release: 0.3.0.1
Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.2.0.2
URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/case-insensitive/
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: gtk2hs-buildtools-0.12.1 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739876
Summary: gtk2hs-buildtools-0.12.1 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Component: gtk2hs-buildtools
AssignedTo: petersen(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Type: ---
Latest upstream release: 0.12.1
Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.12.0
URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/gtk2hs-buildtools/
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712272
Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fixed In Version|ghc-unix-compat-0.2.1.3-1.f |ghc-unix-compat-0.2.1.3-1.f
|c14 |c16
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712272
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2011-09-30 14:51:43 EDT ---
ghc-unix-compat-0.2.1.3-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable
repository.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731972
Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2011-09-30 14:47:23 EDT ---
cab-0.1.6-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 testing repository.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731972
Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=740283
Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2011-09-29 13:12:32 EDT ---
ghc-attoparsec-enumerator-0.2.0.4-2.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16
testing repository.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=740283
Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=740283
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla <limb(a)jcomserv.net> 2011-09-28 07:59:52 EDT ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731972
--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla <limb(a)jcomserv.net> 2011-09-28 07:59:07 EDT ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: ghc-digest-0.0.1.0 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735761
Summary: ghc-digest-0.0.1.0 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Component: ghc-digest
AssignedTo: petersen(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Type: ---
Latest upstream release: 0.0.1.0
Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.0.0.9
URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/digest/
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: ghc-blaze-html-0.4.1.7 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=741571
Summary: ghc-blaze-html-0.4.1.7 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Component: ghc-blaze-html
AssignedTo: petersen(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Type: ---
Latest upstream release: 0.4.1.7
Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.4.1.6
URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/blaze-html/
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710031
Lakshmi Narasimhan <lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Flag| |fedora-review?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736602
Lakshmi Narasimhan <lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Flag| |fedora-review?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710031
Lakshmi Narasimhan <lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com
AssignedTo|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736602
Lakshmi Narasimhan <lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com
AssignedTo|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=740283
Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status Whiteboard|ready |
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530688
Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status Whiteboard|Ready |
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530688
Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #19 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2011-09-28 03:24:55 EDT ---
Here is the review:
+:ok, NA: not applicable
MUST Items:
[+] MUST: rpmlint output
rpmlint clean
[+] MUST: Package Naming Guidelines
[+] MUST: spec file name must match base package %{name}
[+] MUST: Packaging Guidelines.
[+] MUST: Licensing Guidelines
[+] MUST: License field in the package spec file must match actual license.
[+] MUST: include license files in %doc if available in source
[+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English and be legible.
[+] MUST: source md5sum matches upstream release
7b0ba1e90b53f7ea9883f9a6cf07d3d4 language-c-0.4.2.tar.gz
[+] MUST: must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on one main arch
[+] MUST: if necessary use ExcludeArch for other archs
[+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires
[NA] MUST: use %find_lang macro for .po translations
[NA] MUST: packages which store shared library files in the dynamic linker's
default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun.
[NA] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must
state this fact in the request for review
[+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates.
[+] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing.
[+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly.
[+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros
section of Packaging Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
[NA] MUST: Large documentation files should go in a doc subpackage.
[+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the
runtime of the application.
[+] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package.
[NA] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package.
[NA] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g.
libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in
a -devel package.
[+] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency
[+] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be
removed in the spec.
[NA] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop
file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the
%install section.
[+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
[+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
SHOULD Items:
[+] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane.
Package is APPROVED.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731972
Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag| |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2011-09-28 02:02:25 EDT ---
Thanks for the review.
New Package SCM Request
=======================
Package Name: cab
Short Description: Haskell cabal wrapper program
Owners: petersen
Branches: f14 f15 f16
InitialCC: haskell-sig
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=740283
Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag| |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2011-09-28 01:54:15 EDT ---
New Package SCM Request
=======================
Package Name: ghc-attoparsec-enumerator
Short Description: Haskell attoparsec to iteree library
Owners: petersen
Branches: f16 f15 f14 el6
InitialCC: haskell-sig
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731972
--- Comment #3 from Lakshmi Narasimhan <lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com> 2011-09-28 01:18:13 EDT ---
Mail sent to upstream requesting them to include license header in each of the
source files.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=740283
--- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2011-09-27 20:30:42 EDT ---
Thanks, Lakshmi, for the review.
> There is a summary-too-long error. Can that be fixed?
Yes, good point - let me fix that when importing.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736586
Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fixed In Version|ghc-vector-0.7.1-1.fc15 |ghc-vector-0.7.1-1.fc14
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736582
Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fixed In Version|ghc-vector-0.7.1-1.fc15 |ghc-vector-0.7.1-1.fc14
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736586
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2011-09-27 19:04:32 EDT ---
ghc-vector-0.7.1-1.fc14, ghc-primitive-0.3.1-2.fc14 has been pushed to the
Fedora 14 stable repository.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736582
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2011-09-27 19:04:25 EDT ---
ghc-vector-0.7.1-1.fc14, ghc-primitive-0.3.1-2.fc14 has been pushed to the
Fedora 14 stable repository.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736586
Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version| |ghc-vector-0.7.1-1.fc15
Resolution| |ERRATA
Last Closed| |2011-09-27 19:02:48
Bug 736586 depends on bug 736582, which changed state.
Bug 736582 Summary: Review Request: ghc-primitive - Wrappers for primitive operations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736582
What |Old Value |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution| |ERRATA
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736582
Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version| |ghc-vector-0.7.1-1.fc15
Resolution| |ERRATA
Last Closed| |2011-09-27 19:02:43
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736586
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2011-09-27 19:02:37 EDT ---
ghc-vector-0.7.1-1.fc15, ghc-primitive-0.3.1-2.fc15 has been pushed to the
Fedora 15 stable repository.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736582
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2011-09-27 19:02:31 EDT ---
ghc-vector-0.7.1-1.fc15, ghc-primitive-0.3.1-2.fc15 has been pushed to the
Fedora 15 stable repository.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731972
Lakshmi Narasimhan <lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Lakshmi Narasimhan <lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com> 2011-09-27 15:04:24 EDT ---
[+]MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in
the review.
rpmlint -i *.rpm ../cab.spec
cab.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ghc -> chg
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
cab.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary cab
Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page.
cab.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ghc -> chg
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.
[+]MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[+]MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec
[+]MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
Naming-Yes
Version-release - Matches
No prebuilt external bits - OK
Spec legibity - OK
Package template - OK
Arch support - OK
Libexecdir - OK
rpmlint - yes
changelogs - OK
Source url tag - OK, validated.
Build Requires list - OK
Summary and description - OK
API documentation - OK, none available
[+]MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet
the Licensing Guidelines .
License is BSD
[+]MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
[+]MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.
LICENSE file is included
[+]MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
[+]MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[+]MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream
source,as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task.
md5sum cab-0.1.6-1.fc15.src/cab-0.1.6.tar.gz
2b595a8413e31a7d34cfd10761caa636 cab-0.1.6-1.fc15.src/cab-0.1.6.tar.gz
md5sum cab-0.1.6.tar.gz
2b595a8413e31a7d34cfd10761caa636 cab-0.1.6.tar.gz
[+]MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at
least one primary architecture.
Built on i686.
[+]MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch.
[+]MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires.
[NA]MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly using the %find_lang macro
[NA]MUST: Packages stores shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and
%postun.
[+]MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
Checked with rpmquery --list
[NA]MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state
this fact in the request for review.
[+]MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates.
Checked with rpmquery --whatprovides
[+]MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec
file's %files listings.
[+]MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly.
Checked with ls -lR
[+]MUST: Each package must consistently use macros.
[+]MUST: The package must contain code, or permissible content.
[NA]MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage.
[+]MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the
runtime of the application.
[NA]MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package.
[NA]MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package.
[NA]MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix
(e.g.libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must
go in a -devel package.
[NA]MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned
dependency: Requires: {name} = %{version}-%{release}
[NA]MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be
removed in the spec if they are built.
[NA]MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop
file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the
%install section
[+]MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
[+]MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
Should items
[+]SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[+]SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described.
Installed the package. No issues.Ran the program "cab". No issues.
[+]SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane.
cabal2spec-diff is OK.
APPROVED.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=740283
Lakshmi Narasimhan <lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Lakshmi Narasimhan <lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com> 2011-09-27 14:47:00 EDT ---
[+]MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in
the review.
ghc-attoparsec-enumerator.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell ->
Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-attoparsec-enumerator.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) iteree ->
iterate, iterator, iterative
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-attoparsec-enumerator.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US iteree
-> iterate, iterator, iterative
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-attoparsec-enumerator.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell ->
Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-attoparsec-enumerator.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) iteree ->
iterate, iterator, iterative
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-attoparsec-enumerator.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US iteree
-> iterate, iterator, iterative
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-attoparsec-enumerator-devel.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) iteree
-> iterate, iterator, iterative
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-attoparsec-enumerator-devel.i686: E: summary-too-long C Development files
for Haskell library to convert an attoparsec parser to an iteree
The "Summary:" must not exceed 80 characters.
ghc-attoparsec-enumerator-devel.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US
iteree -> iterate, iterator, iterative
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 8 warnings.
[+]MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[+]MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec
[+]MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
Naming-Yes
Version-release - Matches
No prebuilt external bits - OK
Spec legibity - OK
Package template - OK
Arch support - OK
Libexecdir - OK
rpmlint - yes
changelogs - OK
Source url tag - OK, validated.
Build Requires list - OK
Summary and description - OK
API documentation - OK, in devel package
[+]MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet
the Licensing Guidelines.
MIT license
[+]MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
[+]MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.
license.txt file contains the actual license
[+]MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
[+]MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[+]MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream
source,as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task.
md5sum
ghc-attoparsec-enumerator-0.2.0.4-1.fc15.src/attoparsec-enumerator-0.2.0.4.tar.gz
59153f3fa18a87bb4fbe7bcc359d8ac6
ghc-attoparsec-enumerator-0.2.0.4-1.fc15.src/attoparsec-enumerator-0.2.0.4.tar.gz
md5sum attoparsec-enumerator-0.2.0.4.tar.gz
59153f3fa18a87bb4fbe7bcc359d8ac6 attoparsec-enumerator-0.2.0.4.tar.gz
[+]MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at
least one primary architecture.
Built on i686.
[+]MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch.
[+]MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires.
[NA]MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly using the %find_lang macro
[NA]MUST: Packages stores shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and
%postun.
[+]MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
Checked with rpmquery --list
[NA]MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state
this fact in the request for review.
[+]MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates.
Checked with rpmquery --whatprovides
[+]MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec
file's %files listings.
[+]MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly.
Checked with ls -lR
[+]MUST: Each package must consistently use macros.
[+]MUST: The package must contain code, or permissible content.
[NA]MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage.
[+]MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the
runtime of the application.
[NA]MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package.
[NA]MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package.
[NA]MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix
(e.g.libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must
go in a -devel package.
[+]MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned
dependency: Requires: {name} = %{version}-%{release}
rpm -e ghc-attoparsec-enumerator
error: Failed dependencies:
ghc-attoparsec-enumerator = 0.2.0.4-1.fc14 is needed by (installed)
ghc-attoparsec-enumerator-devel-0.2.0.4-1.fc14.i686
[NA]MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be
removed in the spec if they are built.
[NA]MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop
file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the
%install section
[+]MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
[+]MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
Should items
[+]SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[+]SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described.
Installed the package. Installs fine. Imported Data.Attoparsec.Enumerator into
ghci. Works fine.
[+]SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane.
cabal2spec-diff is OK.
APPROVED.
There is a summary-too-long error. Can that be fixed?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530688
Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status Whiteboard| |Ready
--- Comment #18 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2011-09-27 06:31:26 EDT ---
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3381031
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.