Hmmmm, I am not 100% sure when a box goes down. I believe it would still route the traffic to the dead box however if you set the --every 1 you wouldn't notice too much.
It would give us enough time I reckon to get the box back online or we could just remove it from the iptables until the box came back up.
On 11/05/07, Mike McGrath mmcgrath@redhat.com wrote:
Damian Myerscough wrote:
Hey Mike,
I have seen:
if you want to balance the load to the 3 addresses 10.0.0.5, 10.0.0.6 and 10.0.0.7, then you can do as follows :
# iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -m nth --counter 7 --every 3 --packet 0 -j SNAT --to-source 10.0.0.5 # iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -m nth --counter 7 --every 3 --packet 1 -j SNAT --to-source 10.0.0.6 # iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -m nth --counter 7 --every 3 --packet 2 -j SNAT --to-source 10.0.0.7
Do you have a box that can act as a dedicated balance loader while FC 7 is being released
How well does this work when 10.0.0.6 goes down?
-Mike
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list